Haha. He was stopped early and he does deserve a rematch.palooka wrote:And you'll never convince me that Groves was stopped necessarily or that he doesn't deserve a rematch :)
How did you have the fight scored going into the 9th?
Haha. He was stopped early and he does deserve a rematch.palooka wrote:And you'll never convince me that Groves was stopped necessarily or that he doesn't deserve a rematch :)
I said before Keith; I though Groves was maybe 3 rounds up but the rounds he won he won big, in a punishing way, he didn't nick a round or get it by default.keithmoonhangover wrote:Haha. He was stopped early and he does deserve a rematch.palooka wrote:And you'll never convince me that Groves was stopped necessarily or that he doesn't deserve a rematch :)
How did you have the fight scored going into the 9th?
It wouldn't. Ward would stop him within 6 rounds. EasilyEmmseegee wrote:To be perfectly honest, I would rather see Groves in with Ward than see Froch in with him again.
The gulf in glass was just far too big between Froch and Ward to make me even remotely interested in watching it again.
At least seeing Groves in with Ward would bring something new and different. Im not saying he would win but it would be interesting.
Andre is quality but the Dawson destruction is an anomalylillywhite14 wrote:It wouldn't. Ward would stop him within 6 rounds. EasilyEmmseegee wrote:To be perfectly honest, I would rather see Groves in with Ward than see Froch in with him again.
The gulf in glass was just far too big between Froch and Ward to make me even remotely interested in watching it again.
At least seeing Groves in with Ward would bring something new and different. Im not saying he would win but it would be interesting.