Michael Spinks vs Antonio Tarver
Michael Spinks vs Antonio Tarver
Spinks is only one of 2 men ( RJ Jr) to win the light heavy and step up to win the heavyweight title. (I'm not counting Moorer and his WBO) Tarver is the current best 175 lb fighter out there and wants to step up to heavyweight. We saw what he did to Jones. Jr. How would Tarver fare against The Spinks Jinx?
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru
zuru
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
zuru wrote:Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru
that is why a past his prime roy jones BEAT tarver
Zuru, AS BB pointed out, Technicaly If Jones and Tarver fight 20 times Tarver will win 19 of the them.
I'm going with Spinks I think he was not just a Roy Jones specialist which is what I have come to call Tarver. Just a better Ring General and has such an unusual style.
Hmmmm Maybe if Tarver studied for years just to beat Spinks he might be able to do it. But then he wouldnt be able to beat Jones.
I'm going with Spinks I think he was not just a Roy Jones specialist which is what I have come to call Tarver. Just a better Ring General and has such an unusual style.
Hmmmm Maybe if Tarver studied for years just to beat Spinks he might be able to do it. But then he wouldnt be able to beat Jones.
-
iceman21287
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 324
- Joined: 05 May 2005, 00:23
I can see why ppl would discuss Spinks-Tarver.
Both can be quite awful to look at, technically sloppy, ungainly. and both can really punch. But look at how Tarver loses confidence when pressed (Glen Johnson, for example). Look how Spinks would engage the guy and blast them out, i.e. the excellent Marvin Johnson & Yaqui Lopez.
Spinks is another class. He always found a way and STAYED at the top. 10 title defenses in the toughest ever era of light heavies. Tarver beat some difficult foes (Harding, Jones, Johnson), but he also lost to all of them!
Both can be quite awful to look at, technically sloppy, ungainly. and both can really punch. But look at how Tarver loses confidence when pressed (Glen Johnson, for example). Look how Spinks would engage the guy and blast them out, i.e. the excellent Marvin Johnson & Yaqui Lopez.
Spinks is another class. He always found a way and STAYED at the top. 10 title defenses in the toughest ever era of light heavies. Tarver beat some difficult foes (Harding, Jones, Johnson), but he also lost to all of them!
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15666
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Yes the judges blindly out of a Jones"high" gave the fight to Jones,but everyone with eyeballs who saw the fight,KNOW that Tarver was robbed.So technically yes,maybe 19 out of 20.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:zuru wrote:Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru
that is why a past his prime roy jones BEAT tarver
-
Rory McCloskey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1042
- Joined: 29 Jun 2005, 13:11
if jones fought tarver in his prime..then he wins 20 out of 20 times. tarver beat for the most part, and over the hill jones.zuru wrote:Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru
anyway ill take spinks in a lopsided fight.. TKO round 8
-
hawaiianpunch
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 89
- Joined: 15 Feb 2003, 14:54
Spinks on points.
Tarver is a good fighter but would have been just another good contender when Spinks was the king of the Light-Heavyweights. The division was full of monsters in those days like Scott, Qawi, Saad Muhammad, Lopez, Martin, Johnson and Conteh etc etc
Spinks was topdog in a golden 175lb era and would have had too many ringsmarts and that dangerous Spinks Jinx to keep Tarver at bay.
Tarver is a good fighter but would have been just another good contender when Spinks was the king of the Light-Heavyweights. The division was full of monsters in those days like Scott, Qawi, Saad Muhammad, Lopez, Martin, Johnson and Conteh etc etc
Spinks was topdog in a golden 175lb era and would have had too many ringsmarts and that dangerous Spinks Jinx to keep Tarver at bay.
bullshit, a prime Roy Jones outclasses Tarver.zuru wrote:Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru
Now we all know that Irish has a BIG CRUSH on roy Jones.It's o.k. broseph.You two make a nice couple.How many of his "rapping"cd's do you own?Irish wrote:bullshit, a prime Roy Jones outclasses Tarver.zuru wrote:Tarver is a good fighter.And it seems that if he & Jones fight 20 times,he will win 20 times.Some fighters no matter how good they are have the one guy that they will always lose to,and for Jones,it is Tarver.But Spinks is in a different class than these guys.Spinks as stated above scores a one-sided K.O.
zuru