Would Ken Buchanan of won if Duran didn't foul him so much?

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 23 Nov 2005, 09:03

Without the fouling would anyone reckon he'd still have beaten Kenny?

Duran said that was his toughest fight and even refused him a rematch.

elmersalsa · Post by **elmersalsa** » 23 Nov 2005, 09:38

Duran was way ahead in the scorecards. Buchanan to win had to knock Roberto out. Although, he was coming back, he already got an ass whipping before the 13th round.

Broncano · Post by **Broncano** » 23 Nov 2005, 09:43

Steve M · Post by **Steve M** » 23 Nov 2005, 09:43

No.

I think it's pretty obvious if you watch the fight that Duran was just better.No shame in that.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 23 Nov 2005, 10:59

elmersalsa wrote:Duran was way ahead in the scorecards. Buchanan to win had to knock Roberto out. Although, he was coming back, he already got an ass whipping before the 13th round.

If he was so ahead why does Duran say that was his toughest fight and why did he never grant him a rematch?

Tantum · Post by **Tantum** » 23 Nov 2005, 11:14

Max Molyneux wrote:If he was so ahead why does Duran say that was his toughest fight and why did he never grant him a rematch?

Is that from the British Homers Journal?

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 23 Nov 2005, 11:19

Kenny was a class fighter but Duran was a great Lightweight and I believe he wouls have still stopped or outpointed The Tartan Warrior without the fouls.

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 23 Nov 2005, 12:16

Tantum wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:If he was so ahead why does Duran say that was his toughest fight and why did he never grant him a rematch?
Is that from the British Homers Journal?

Duran said it himself.