There is a big difference between top 10 or higher domestically and getting past domestic level, which is what I stated. He already is, IMO arguably top 10 domestically and I would sure favour him against the likes of a Tom Dallas, Larry O character now.n1ebf wrote:so what? I can't see why you've dragged Hughie into this. He was moving very freely, they might have spent the last hour training. Very harsh indeed. Why won't the cousin get passed domestic level? I'm far from a close follower but to my knowledge the competition in this country is not exactly deep.....there's routinely lads around his weight class in the top 10 or higher whose tally of "L's" is into the double figures. I haven't really had a chance to observe - but I'd suggest at 19 or whatever he is, he's making a splendid fist of it so far.stujones wrote:I would suggest that the 50 year old player coach, prop, who is obese and never a "trainer", runs a hell of a lot better and quicker than these.
Is this a parody? They cannot be serious. That's a shambles.
I can remember Lennox Lewis basically embarrassing himself on the American version of superstars when he was champ..... but he looked Halle Gabreselle compared to these.
Also i think heavier athletes are always going to be at a disadvantage when it comes to things like Superstars. Especially heavyweight boxers. They're shifting one hell of a lot of muscle-mass, even doing basic press-ups. They're not whippets.
But seeing how spent he looked at the end of 6 rounds either against Darch or Kisicek (can't remember which one), hand to his waist, wild swinging hit and hope tactics - nah, don't think he is going to be EBU champion. For me not getting past domestic level is someone who can win a british level and not make the step beyond that. Danny Williams, although fought for a world title, never got past domestic level.
I see Tyson as the better fighter, better stamina and possibly even better power and a fair amount trickier cause of his freakish size.