Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Who would win?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Ezzard »

I'd have to go with Quarry. He just showed too much in his career. It's not clear cut but Jerry has better skills and a better pedigree.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7183
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Nile4000 »

Tony had mad skills, but they were never totally developed, and Jerry outworks him for the UD in ,10,12, or 15 rounds.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by The Great John L »

I think Tucker was possibly the most talented of the 80's under-acheivers, but Quarry had the experience and heart to overcome Tucker's physical advantages pull it out. A near tossup but I'd give the edge to Quarry.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7183
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Nile4000 »

The Great John L wrote:I think Tucker was possibly the most talented of the 80's under-acheivers, but Quarry had the experience and heart to overcome Tucker's physical advantages pull it out. A near tossup but I'd give the edge to Quarry.
Greg Page over Tony Tucker all the time. :TU:
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by The Great John L »

Nile4000 wrote:
The Great John L wrote:I think Tucker was possibly the most talented of the 80's under-acheivers, but Quarry had the experience and heart to overcome Tucker's physical advantages pull it out. A near tossup but I'd give the edge to Quarry.
Greg Page over Tony Tucker all the time. :TU:
You really are a Page fan. No doubt that when he was on his game he was very good.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7183
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Nile4000 »

The Great John L wrote:
Nile4000 wrote:
The Great John L wrote:I think Tucker was possibly the most talented of the 80's under-acheivers, but Quarry had the experience and heart to overcome Tucker's physical advantages pull it out. A near tossup but I'd give the edge to Quarry.
Greg Page over Tony Tucker all the time. :TU:
You really are a Page fan. No doubt that when he was on his game he was very good.
Thanks :TU: . I honestly thought Tony would've been a great heavy under the right circumstances, but the things that happened during his development hurt him.Liked his fight with James Broad, however.
drunkenpiper36
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 11:13

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by drunkenpiper36 »

Quarry is the better legacy fighter and probably p4p as well. But Tony Tucker didn't fit into the mold of the slow plodding big men that Jerry was able to beat. He had sound boxing skills, good left hook, fair defense, and at 6'5", 225 lbs ( when prime ) was significantly larger than Quarry. Tony also had a chin. Quarry might win some of the early rounds. But with his tendency to get cut and decked, I think he'd get broken down for the stoppage somewhere between rounds 7-9.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by dempseyfire »

Quarry easy decision. Tucker would get outworked and outboxed . . .it took more than some height and a quick left jab to beat Jerry.

Tucker is getting badly over-rated here. He looked like poo in most of his pre-Tyson matches and even vs Iron Mike didn't do much beyond constantly hold and run.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Quarry beat him as well.Quarry W12 or W15
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Tony Tucker v. Jerry Quarry

Post by BoxBuzz »

Quarry 6 Days a week. He don't fight on Sundays.
Post Reply