Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by TopGun »

He always slags off the sun for letting Frank write his column in there. I'm pleased as it is another read for the fans I guess: -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... smail.html
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by bigB »

like the cribs type view on Matchroom HQ
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by Alba »

Shame it's for a rag like that .
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by expe »

Just another reason not to buy the daily mail.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by broomy7s »

After all the shit Patrick Collins has been sprouting about boxing. :roll:
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by SAPFO »

I said this should happen last week..
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by TJ77 »

Oh dear.
ringtoneboxing
Super Middleweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 07:24

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by ringtoneboxing »

In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by TJ77 »

ringtoneboxing wrote:In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.
Remove the word boxing from your sentence and your closer :TU:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by Chambers2 »

The Tory Cunnting Mail!!!

Have a word with yaself Edward
onlyme
Middleweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 28 Sep 2013, 11:08

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by onlyme »

The man who represents boxers who are usually from poor backgrounds signs for a paper who castigate the poor
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Well done Eddie....I am sure all those vicious, racist old grannies from Worthing and Bexhill-on-Sea, deeply bitter minor civil servants, health and safety inspectors, right-wing housewives with absurd blue perms and retired, barking-mad majors will be ringside at your next show. Please make sure you mention how birching really works, stereotype some black people as inherent criminals and name check the War in every column. :wink:
Jakemilo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 188
Joined: 06 Dec 2011, 18:43

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by Jakemilo »

His love of shipping cheap argies over wont go down well
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by liamlion »

TJ77 wrote:
ringtoneboxing wrote:In my view, Hearn instantly becomes the most credible boxing writer at that paper.
Remove the word boxing from your sentence and your closer :TU:
Exactly right.

Good look to Eddie Hearn but that newspaper organisation is a piece of sh1t. Particularly packed full of hateful tory propaganda. I certainly wouldnt want my name associated with it.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by lefty »

Eddie is a posh, rich boy himself though at the end of the day.
heisenberg
Middleweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 11 Oct 2013, 08:06

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by heisenberg »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by danconnollyeire »

Hearn is mooting (not that much) Froch vs Golovkin. GGG isn't as slick as Groves but hits a but harder IMO and Froch is easy to catch. I could see that being a stoppage because Carl can only last so long using his face as a shield (as Groves proved) and doesn't have to power to KO GGG
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by TopGun »

danconnollyeire wrote:Hearn is mooting (not that much) Froch vs Golovkin. GGG isn't as slick as Groves but hits a but harder IMO and Froch is easy to catch. I could see that being a stoppage because Carl can only last so long using his face as a shield (as Groves proved) and doesn't have to power to KO GGG

Hard to tell whether he hits harder. Groves is a massive puncher.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by expe »

heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it
Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the fornicate is the man on?
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by ScottDetonator »

expe wrote:
heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it
Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the eff is the man on?
I don't know but could they have put any more pictures of Eddie on that page? Did they sign him for his looks or his boxing journalistic ability?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27526
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by stujones »

ScottDetonator wrote:
expe wrote:
heisenberg wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... -fans.html

His first one above. Interesting what he says about the Froch dressing room being a bit off, complacency crept in by the sounds of it
Biggest fight in British Boxing history, what the eff is the man on?
I don't know but could they have put any more pictures of Eddie on that page? Did they sign him for his looks or his boxing journalistic ability?
He is outrageously handsome.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by whiskey »

People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23203
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by mickey1975 »

G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.
You're not unemployed, are you?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by lefty »

mickey1975 wrote:
G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.
You're not unemployed, are you?
You should realise by now Mickey that there's normally a hint of dark humour in Gomez's posts.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Eddie Hearn signs for the Daily Mail!

Post by expe »

G0mez wrote:People who often hate on another person, boils down to the fact they are a bit jealous.

I don't know of anyone who hates on a skint, fat, ugly shy unemployed geezer.

Just as well or I would have no friends.
I hate Carl Froch, but there is no way I'd want to be him, although I would give his missus a go or three.
Post Reply