Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post Reply
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by Vladimir5555 »

What happens?
Top
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46533
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by gilgamesh »

Spinks UD
Top
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by Vladimir5555 »

gilgamesh wrote:Spinks UD

Agreed.Spinks better fighter than Griffin.Spinks couldn't knocking out JT but could outworked him.
Top
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46533
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by gilgamesh »

Vladimir5555 wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Spinks UD

Agreed.Spinks better fighter than Griffin.Spinks couldn't knocking out JT but could outworked him.
James wasn't the greatest at dealing with guys who could box well from a distance either, Michael could certainly do that as well as most any Light Heavyweight ever could. Bad style match-up for James.
Top
Bobbyptsd
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1858
Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 00:58

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by Bobbyptsd »

Indeed, the moment I saw this thread I thought: "Not a good style for James"
Top
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by elmersalsa »

Bobbyptsd wrote:Indeed, the moment I saw this thread I thought: "Not a good style for James"
Exactly.
Top
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Michael Spinks v. James Toney at 175

Post by Tomasino »

Spinks wide UD. No chance for Tiney here, Spinks just too strong, too fit and too good for Toney.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Boxing History”