Groves v froch not happening

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23202
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by mickey1975 »

Parson Cross wrote:Oh you'd be shocked at Groves own value of himself mate.
After being "brought up" by Haye and Booth, I wouldn't.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by ScottDetonator »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/25883588

Here we go... Anyone feel like we are having our plonkers pulled here?
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by TopGun »

ScottDetonator wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/25883588

Here we go... Anyone feel like we are having our plonkers pulled here?

This is poor from Geogre to turn down 7 figure purse
gazzman87
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 69
Joined: 05 Jun 2012, 17:11

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by gazzman87 »

If Froch fights Chavez it's win win. If he loses the Groves fight is still on.
If he loses with Groves the Chavez fight is off.
Wants to pick up two paycheck's can't blame him can you?
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by ScottDetonator »

Groves possibly wants £2 million to cover the frustration he will have for the rest of his career after losing twice to Froch.

Insane he should turn down a million+ though, how many world titles are fought for across the globe for a hell of a lot less? The kid needs a reality check.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by Parson Cross »

And so it begins .........
Done deal by mid February.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by Parson Cross »

Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by earsjohn »

Parson Cross wrote:Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
But it's the view of one party in a two-party negotiation; how can it be anything other than the complete, 100% accurate, entire story?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by Parson Cross »

Spit it out.
Are you saying you don't believe a 7 figure offer has been made ?
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by Crazyboy »

Parson Cross wrote:Just to clarify just because it says 7 figure sum does not mean the offer was just 1 million.
Absolutely, good point
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by earsjohn »

Parson Cross wrote:Spit it out.
Are you saying you don't believe a 7 figure offer has been made ?
I would guess that a 7 figure offer has been made, but there will likely be a number of add-ons, caveats, qualifications and riders. And therefore, I don't believe that Groves has turned down a straight-cash £1m+ offer (which is what the story/Team Froch would like us to think).
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by lillywhite14 »

To be honest, I think 500k is a good offer, if he has turned down a mill then he is deluded.

If he don't fight Carl he will do well to earn a tenth of that for his next fight!
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Groves v froch not happening

Post by orbtastic »

Presumably there is an options/rematch clause in that offer, it's just good business sense...but it does mean there is more to it than a 7 figure offer.

Anyway, I'm not entirely sure how a mandated IBF fight alters this, as it doesn't go to purse bids, does it? Or does it? I thought that only happened for vacant title fights but seem to recall Wlad/Povetkin went to purse bids as it was mandated.

Or Froch could just vacate, obviously.
Post Reply