LHW RANKINGS

Post Reply
jp2
Super Middleweight
Posts: 20
Joined: 11 Apr 2013, 15:54

LHW RANKINGS

Post by jp2 »

How the heck does a 1-0 fighter beat a nobody and actually didn't even make 175 get ranked at 39???
Then to make it even worse you have a 6-0 guy that has never fought at 175 ranked 26.
I know these rankings don't mean a whole lot but by doing things like this it becomes a joke.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: LHW RANKINGS

Post by claudevsq »

"Doing things like this"?

Thses rankings are completely automated...
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: LHW RANKINGS

Post by AntonS »

claudevsq wrote:"Doing things like this"?

Thses rankings are completely automated...
Just like me. When the stubbie is empty, I promptly find my way to the fridge :lol:
jp2
Super Middleweight
Posts: 20
Joined: 11 Apr 2013, 15:54

Re: LHW RANKINGS

Post by jp2 »

claudevsq wrote:"Doing things like this"?

Thses rankings are completely automated...
BS, if they're automated how are boxing being ranked in a weight class they have never once competed in? A human has to give the computer the info in the first place.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: LHW RANKINGS

Post by claudevsq »

The editors put in the weight class for every boxer, and they can change the weight class at any time. Rankings are compiled by computer based on last 365 days results, wins-losses, like quality of opponents and so on...
Post Reply