Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?expe wrote:Can they give both fighters what they want? If there's a single option in the deal Groves won't sign, Froch is unlikely to agree to a split less than 75-25, but Groves wants good money for the fight, so Froch would need to be paid more, but is the budget there for that? Hearn wants to make big money from the fight and won't want to stand any chance of losing a penny, Sky will only put up so much money and would want Groves to fight on there in future, then there's all the other costs of the show to cover on top, plus Sky are not some all powerful force that blow away everything in their path, other broadcasters will be interested, BT have outbid them for football rights, Sky's main sports market, allegedly and allegedly will undoubtedly want to show the fight, Golden Boy and Sauerland will be interested as well.jackukmma wrote:It's daft even talking about it. It's not going to purse bids. Both fighters want it, despite what they might say in the press and media. They've sold the fight brilliantly again. It's worth a fortune. There's no chance at all sky/Hearn let it get to purse bids when they can quite easily give both fighters what they want
Will allegedly......
Re: Will allegedly......
Re: Will allegedly......
Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.leforge wrote:Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?expe wrote:Can they give both fighters what they want? If there's a single option in the deal Groves won't sign, Froch is unlikely to agree to a split less than 75-25, but Groves wants good money for the fight, so Froch would need to be paid more, but is the budget there for that? Hearn wants to make big money from the fight and won't want to stand any chance of losing a penny, Sky will only put up so much money and would want Groves to fight on there in future, then there's all the other costs of the show to cover on top, plus Sky are not some all powerful force that blow away everything in their path, other broadcasters will be interested, BT have outbid them for football rights, Sky's main sports market, allegedly and allegedly will undoubtedly want to show the fight, Golden Boy and Sauerland will be interested as well.jackukmma wrote:It's daft even talking about it. It's not going to purse bids. Both fighters want it, despite what they might say in the press and media. They've sold the fight brilliantly again. It's worth a fortune. There's no chance at all sky/Hearn let it get to purse bids when they can quite easily give both fighters what they want
Re: Will allegedly......
Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?[/quote]
Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.[/quote]
Have a guess at the number? Sky will want this rematch it make them a lot of money froch won't fight on another channel.
Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.[/quote]
Have a guess at the number? Sky will want this rematch it make them a lot of money froch won't fight on another channel.
Re: Will allegedly......
In what universe does Carl Froch agree to fight on a W£rren card? If it somehow ends up going to bids (it won't) and Fwank somehow outbids everyone for the fight, Carl will just pull out. The fight will happen, it will be on Sky Box Office, everyone will make more than enough money and Fwank will dismiss the fight as meaningless as Andre Ward is the true champion at 168.expe wrote: Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.
Anyone who thinks something other than this, can you please let me know what you're drinking; I've not been on a good trip in a while.
Re: Will allegedly......
Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.[/quote]leforge wrote:Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?
Have a guess at the number? Sky will want this rematch it make them a lot of money froch won't fight on another channel.[/quote]
There's a difference between wanting something and actually getting it.
Re: Will allegedly......
Carl Froch won't fight on a allegedly card, but all that means is that if Warren bids big, without losing a penny, he removes Froch's IBF title, gets some major publicity and then has the chance to promote Groves fighting for the vacant belt, or in the unlikely situation that Froch does fight, he makes big money from the show, he can't lose.earsjohn wrote:In what universe does Carl Froch agree to fight on a W£rren card? If it somehow ends up going to bids (it won't) and Fwank somehow outbids everyone for the fight, Carl will just pull out. The fight will happen, it will be on Sky Box Office, everyone will make more than enough money and Fwank will dismiss the fight as meaningless as Andre Ward is the true champion at 168.expe wrote: Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.
Anyone who thinks something other than this, can you please let me know what you're drinking; I've not been on a good trip in a while.
Re: Will allegedly......
Have a guess at the number? Sky will want this rematch it make them a lot of money froch won't fight on another channel.[/quote]expe wrote:Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.leforge wrote:Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?
There's a difference between wanting something and actually getting it.[/quote]
It will either happen on sky ppv or the fight wont happen end of. You still did not give a guess at number for the first fight the second one will smash that.
Re: Will allegedly......
There's a difference between wanting something and actually getting it.[/quote]leforge wrote:Have a guess at the number? Sky will want this rematch it make them a lot of money froch won't fight on another channel.expe wrote:Sky haven't put out figures for the first fight, I haven't got a clue how many it did. Sky were outbid by far by BT for the Champions League rights, if BT want to break into boxing this fight is the perfect option and Sky can work with promoters that aren't Eddie Hearn if they want to, for this fight I doubt they would have a problem working with another promoter.leforge wrote:Get real it end up on sky ppv. How many people bought first fight do you think?
It will either happen on sky ppv or the fight wont happen end of. You still did not give a guess at number for the first fight the second one will smash that.[/quote]
For the second I would guess around 500,000 buys, 350,000 for the first. 500,000 would be £7,500,000 in TV revenue, some of which would go to Sky.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Will allegedly......
Some funny stuff being said.
Expe - think I've asked you this before and you haven't answered. If BN bid are you seriously thinking they won't want options on Groves ?
Expe - think I've asked you this before and you haven't answered. If BN bid are you seriously thinking they won't want options on Groves ?
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Will allegedly......
Fair enough - but you haven't answered the question.
I've been in and around boxing long enough to know that UK Promotors do not invest in one fight wonders.
Wazza will not put millions up to make a one night profit.
He'll want George's soul win lose or draw.
For that reason in Dragons Den terminology - he's out - if George is good to his word that this isn't about the money it's about the options.
Why am I saying this ?
It ain't fuckin going to purse bids anyway !!
But going back to the original point when Wazza brought Tyson over did he want options ? Damn sure he did.
I've been in and around boxing long enough to know that UK Promotors do not invest in one fight wonders.
Wazza will not put millions up to make a one night profit.
He'll want George's soul win lose or draw.
For that reason in Dragons Den terminology - he's out - if George is good to his word that this isn't about the money it's about the options.
Why am I saying this ?
It ain't fuckin going to purse bids anyway !!
But going back to the original point when Wazza brought Tyson over did he want options ? Damn sure he did.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Will allegedly......
But going back to the original point when Wazza brought Tyson over did he want options ? Damn sure he did.[/quote]
Serious + straight question Parson, did he get options on Iron Mike ?
I don't know the answer, hence asking. We'd all like options on Mike Tyson (circa his visit to the UK) but there's wanting and there's getting.... I wouldn't have thought Mr Tyson would be forthcoming ?
Serious + straight question Parson, did he get options on Iron Mike ?
I don't know the answer, hence asking. We'd all like options on Mike Tyson (circa his visit to the UK) but there's wanting and there's getting.... I wouldn't have thought Mr Tyson would be forthcoming ?
Re: Will allegedly......
Why wouldn't he put the money up to make a profit? Yes, he would like to have Groves long term, but right now I'm sure he would be delighted to secure a fight of that magnitude for allegedly and the chance to make that kind of money isn't one he can turn down in his current position.Parson Cross wrote:Fair enough - but you haven't answered the question.
I've been in and around boxing long enough to know that UK Promotors do not invest in one fight wonders.
Wazza will not put millions up to make a one night profit.
He'll want George's soul win lose or draw.
For that reason in Dragons Den terminology - he's out - if George is good to his word that this isn't about the money it's about the options.
Why am I saying this ?
It ain't fuckin going to purse bids anyway !!
But going back to the original point when Wazza brought Tyson over did he want options ? Damn sure he did.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Will allegedly......
Wasn't Haye vs Chisora a one night, one-off money making thing with Fwank ? As I recall he didn't get options on Haye. He did have Delboy under contract of course.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Will allegedly......
Precisely ! He gambled on a Chisora win and it didn't happen !
Froch and a Groves major investment and they both walk away ? DTS.
Froch and a Groves major investment and they both walk away ? DTS.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Will allegedly......
Wazza had options on Tyson fighting in the UK. He gave him them back and washed his hands of him after the credit card / expenses dispute.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Will allegedly......
Cheers. I imagine the UK rights didn't really mean jack sxxt in the big scheme of things... but gave Fwank some protection against Tyson coming back and making a rival rich.Parson Cross wrote:Wazza had options on Tyson fighting in the UK. He gave him them back and washed his hands of him after the credit card / expenses dispute.
Re: Will allegedly......
The return on the investment would be the profit from the show and the exposure it would bring to his fighters, signing Groves afterwards would be a bonus. A fight like this isn't going to lose money, so it's a safe investment.Parson Cross wrote:Precisely ! He gambled on a Chisora win and it didn't happen !
Froch and a Groves major investment and they both walk away ? DTS.
Re: Will allegedly......
The Russians who bankrolled Povetkin Vs. Klitschko are interested in Groves / Froch II according to many unreliable Tweeters today. Paddy Fitzpatrick is being fingered as the source of this info.
Re: Will allegedly......
Don't really see why they're interested, neither would fight in Russia, it isn't really a big fight outside this country and they would need to find a broadcaster willing to work with them, plus they have no previous involvement of boxing in this country, or any fighters to put on the undercard.chad wrote:The Russians who bankrolled Povetkin Vs. Klitschko are interested in Groves / Froch II according to many unreliable Tweeters today. Paddy Fitzpatrick is being fingered as the source of this info.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Will allegedly......
Expe - thanks for that didn't realise that
You just don't get it and sometimes like digging a hole the only thing to do is put the spade down.
You just don't get it and sometimes like digging a hole the only thing to do is put the spade down.
Re: Will allegedly......
A little bit rude, there are more fans on the site than insiders, though many insiders seem to do more to obfuscate than elucidate.
Re: Will allegedly......
What load of shit!chad wrote:The Russians who bankrolled Povetkin Vs. Klitschko are interested in Groves / Froch II according to many unreliable Tweeters today. Paddy Fitzpatrick is being fingered as the source of this info.
Re: Will allegedly......
People saying this won't go to purse bids??? How do you know this?? George Groves isn't exactly the most conventional kind of guy!! If he see's this as leverage then he's going to use it!!! If He keeps refusing Hearns offers then purse bids it is!! I'm sure the IBF will have created a deadline for the rematch to be agreed before it goes to purse bids!!
My feeling is Hearn will make an acceptable bid before that happens although I have a sneaky suspicion that Groves is at the mind games again!!
My feeling is Hearn will make an acceptable bid before that happens although I have a sneaky suspicion that Groves is at the mind games again!!
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Will allegedly......
I read this as a bit of dry humour .... ?!chad wrote:The Russians who bankrolled Povetkin Vs. Klitschko are interested in Groves / Froch II according to many unreliable Tweeters today. Paddy Fitzpatrick is being fingered as the source of this info.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Will allegedly......
Purse bids can backfire for groves though.daviddee wrote:People saying this won't go to purse bids??? How do you know this?? George Groves isn't exactly the most conventional kind of guy!! If he see's this as leverage then he's going to use it!!! If He keeps refusing Hearns offers then purse bids it is!! I'm sure the IBF will have created a deadline for the rematch to be agreed before it goes to purse bids!!
My feeling is Hearn will make an acceptable bid before that happens although I have a sneaky suspicion that Groves is at the mind games again!!