Lee Selby Interview

Post Reply
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Lee Selby Interview

Post by El Raincoat »

My article on Lee Selby who fights Rendall Munroe for the vacant European featherweight title Saturday...

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/315879-qa-lee-selby
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by Deserter »

"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win" :o :o

Surely a typo there?
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by El Raincoat »

Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win" :o :o

Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by Deserter »

El Raincoat wrote:
Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win" :o :o

Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.

By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:

http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601

As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by El Raincoat »

Deserter wrote:
El Raincoat wrote:
Deserter wrote:"Smith was as much as 100-1 favorite to win" :o :o

Surely a typo there?
Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.

By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:

http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601

As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.
If Lee Selby tells me he was 100/1 outsider to win, then I believe him, his uncle won £22,000 on him winning.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by palooka »

I enjoyed the interview, Selby is an excellent boxer and he may get right to the top.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by Deserter »

El Raincoat wrote:Nope, genuine...Selby was unknown and given no shot.
Well I'd suggest you really need to do your homework better then. I'll allow the betting experts on here to explain how your sentence doesn't actually make any sense (those odds are nonsensical if you're trying to assert that Smith was the favourite). While presumably your hyperbole was based purely on the Welshsports article from 2011, which has no facts to substantiate its claims whatsoever, but actually claims that it was Selby who was a 100-1 outsider to win by KO.

By contrast, this comprehensive and informed article very clearly shows you that both your assertion and that of the Welshsports writer (Gary Baker) are ludicrous:

http://www.boxingnewsmagazine.com/view- ... BlogID=601

As you can see, the best odds available for a Selby KO were 14-1.[/quote]
El Raincoat wrote:If Lee Selby tells me he was 100/1 outsider to win, then I believe him, his uncle won £22,000 on him winning.
Yep, you're right - you should completely ignore all the factual evidence and just take the word of one individual. You'll go far in journalism :TU:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28553
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by Coco »

From reading the articules It seems to say Selby was 14-1 to win and 100-1 for picking the right round for ko
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Lee Selby Interview

Post by Deserter »

Coco wrote:From reading the articules It seems to say Selby was 14-1 to win and 100-1 for picking the right round for ko
Which is completely different to what is said in the article, that's my only point. Got no time for sloppy journalism....
anyway, getting back on track, I expect Selby to win and hope he gets the opportunity on the world stage as I'm keen on him as a fighter and suspect he'll be one of these types who raises his game to the level he's fighting at :TU:
Post Reply