Golovkin undercard

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by crusader »

Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
Last edited by crusader on 01 Feb 2014, 16:55, edited 1 time in total.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by lefty »

crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by crusader »

columbo wrote:
crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by lefty »

crusader wrote:
columbo wrote:
crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I don't know. I think Stevens could knock Macklin out.
I wouldn't be shocked if he beat them, but I'd have him the underdog.
That's a fight that HBO should make actually.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by crusader »

Ya, I agree.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Golovkin undercard

Post by ttornado »

crusader wrote:Murray and Macklin seem to be on the same level to me. I'd put Stevens a bit below, but I think he's a better fighter now than he was at 168.
I'd put Lee in with the Macklin level, and his boxing skills are a bit superior to anyone you mentioned.
Post Reply