Lewis vs. McCall 1

n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

I was watching this last night while looking for a few clips on bagwork. I always thought McCall had flattened him - KO - but in actual fact Lewis complained to the referee that he was okay. He wasn't okay of course, his legs were very shaky.
Lewis's defence wasn't great there I though.........also, I thought there was a marked difference in his physical shape, compared to when he was older. He definitely packed on some muscle as he grew. Natural I guess.
Oliver McCall had been doing lots of sparring with Mike Tyson before Tyson went away. Tyson had told him to keep throwing them hooks, because one of them would land...
Of course McCall would be back to face Bruno a year later.........I would imagine McCall was a heavy favourite?? McCall won the World Title and then lost it in the UK.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by JimJim2009 »

McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

no doubt you're right. Lewis had very quick hands, quicker than I remember tbh. So that was a great win for Frank Bruno. It would have been a shame if he never achieved his goal of becoming World Champ I think. I was of the impression that Lewis had suffered two very bad KOs, but the Rahman one was a lot worse than this one.

so it went Lewis> McCall > Bruno > Tyson (??) > Holyfield (??) then back to Lewis??
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17175
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by keithmoonhangover »

JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
McCall refused to take a drug test after the Bruno fight and I have it on VERY good authority that he was on coke the day of the fight.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
McCall refused to take a drug test after the Bruno fight and I have it on VERY good authority that he was on coke the day of the fight.
well he was certainly a mess for the second Lewis fight, which was only just over 2 years after the first one I imagine. Goodness knows what the hell was going on there. My point being, it's not a big leap to assume he had a substance abuse history well before that. And yet, by still boxing today at 50 or so, it looks like he's put that sh*t behind him.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by JimJim2009 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
McCall refused to take a drug test after the Bruno fight and I have it on VERY good authority that he was on coke the day of the fight.
Did you sell him it Keith ?!
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17175
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by keithmoonhangover »

JimJim2009 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
McCall refused to take a drug test after the Bruno fight and I have it on VERY good authority that he was on coke the day of the fight.
Did you sell him it Keith ?!
Ha'way Jim. That's a low blow. :roll:
















I only sold him some pills and a quarter of speed. :TU:
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by JimJim2009 »

Sorry mate, couldn't resist :D

The main thing about Oliver was he got his demons sorted out and his head screwed on straight before facing Lennox again.... :OhYes:

Incidentally Oliver has just entered the boxing record books. At the age of 50, he won a fight in Poland at the weekend, defeating a guy who had previously beaten his son.

For a British equivalent, it would be like Tyson Fury losing, and his dad coming out of prison and defeating that boxer ! (in a ring, not by gouging his eyeballs out)
Newport Daz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by Newport Daz »

JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
I think you're being harsh on Mccall. He only just missed Lennox's chin moments earlier with the same punch. Manny Steward said many times that they worked on that punch over and over again. It was no fluke. And you only have to listen to the way Lennox talks about the Rahman and Mccall KO's. He has no respect for Rahman's win at all - to him that was a fluke. With Mccall, his only complaint is that the ref didn't give him the opportunity to continue.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by stevedoc »

i remember a story going around years ago about mccall that he was fighting over here (uk) so either frank or lewis i can't remember and that he was keep in his hotel and not allowed out as he liked to dabble in drugs shall we say and mccall had someone outside his hotel room on guard so he climbed out the 2nd floor window slipped his guard and he was found at a craic den the next morning when he was fighting that night
not the best training for world title fight .
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by thepocketrocket »

Never believe in a fluke knockout win. If you aim for the guys chin, land, and KO the guy then it was hardly an accident.

Those wins stop Lewis being a top five heavyweight, as real legends don't lose to McCall and Rahman and make excuses about 'not preparing correctly'. They just beat them
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

thepocketrocket wrote:Never believe in a fluke knockout win. If you aim for the guys chin, land, and KO the guy then it was hardly an accident.

Those wins stop Lewis being a top five heavyweight, as real legends don't lose to McCall and Rahman and make excuses about 'not preparing correctly'. They just beat them
I don't see how Lewis can have "no respect at all" for the Rahman KO. It's not like the guy cheated him or broke the rules, or gained an unfair advantage.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by big lennox »

The rematches were interesting as well. Lennox's ko of Rahman remains one of the hardest punches I have seen.

The McCall rematch was desperately sad. Not nice seeing someone having a proper break down and being whacked about at the same time. I think I read an interview with Lennox where he said he felt sorry for McCall as well and wasn't quite sure waht to do but had to carry on attacking in case he was being duped.


Although, Lennox doesn't give McCall and Rahman enough credit for their wins, it does show what character he had to go back in there with someone who has knocked you out.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by polecateddy »

JimJim2009 wrote:McCall was the betting favourite, I remember because I'd put twenty quid on Big Frank to win on points.

Lewis was fortunate the ref stopped it, there was a lot of time left in the round and he was out. If the ref had let it go on, he might have got battered. If McCall hadn't landed that once-in-a-lifetime punch at that moment in time, the title probably wouldn't have changed hands...
I lost 200 quid betting on McCall. I recall the odds were pretty much evens on each fighter, with McCall no more than a marginal favourite against Bruno. He was coming off a stinker against Holmes after all.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23202
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by mickey1975 »

stevedoc wrote:i remember a story going around years ago about mccall that he was fighting over here (uk) so either frank or lewis i can't remember and that he was keep in his hotel and not allowed out as he liked to dabble in drugs shall we say and mccall had someone outside his hotel room on guard so he climbed out the 2nd floor window slipped his guard and he was found at a craic den the next morning when he was fighting that night
not the best training for world title fight .
A "craic den"! Did he go for a laugh with the Irish?
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26488
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by banjo »

n1ebf wrote:no doubt you're right. Lewis had very quick hands, quicker than I remember tbh. So that was a great win for Frank Bruno. It would have been a shame if he never achieved his goal of becoming World Champ I think. I was of the impression that Lewis had suffered two very bad KOs, but the Rahman one was a lot worse than this one.

so it went Lewis> McCall > Bruno > Tyson (??) > Holyfield (??) then back to Lewis??
The WBC belt yes, although Tyson was stripped of it in 96 and Lewis won the vacant belt in the 97 rematch with McCall.

The real title went starting from 93 - Bowe > Holyfield > Moorer > Foreman > Briggs > Lewis > Rahman > Lewis
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by lillywhite14 »

thepocketrocket wrote:Never believe in a fluke knockout win. If you aim for the guys chin, land, and KO the guy then it was hardly an accident.

Those wins stop Lewis being a top five heavyweight, as real legends don't lose to McCall and Rahman and make excuses about 'not preparing correctly'. They just beat them
Agree regarding "fluke knockouts"
If a fighter throws a punch how can it be deemed "lucky"? A one off shot, unlikely to be repeated, is probably a better description.

May I ask who is in your top five?
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by thepocketrocket »

lillywhite14 wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Never believe in a fluke knockout win. If you aim for the guys chin, land, and KO the guy then it was hardly an accident.

Those wins stop Lewis being a top five heavyweight, as real legends don't lose to McCall and Rahman and make excuses about 'not preparing correctly'. They just beat them
Agree regarding "fluke knockouts"
If a fighter throws a punch how can it be deemed "lucky"? A one off shot, unlikely to be repeated, is probably a better description.

May I ask who is in your top five?
In no order, Louis, Ali, Holmes, Marciano, Foreman....
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6740
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by Kilburn »

McCall must have been at his peak that night against Lewis. Fit, sharp and very dangerous. Throw his iron chin into the mix and you have yourself a nightmare of an opponent.

I can't see how Lewis would have got McCall under control had the fight continued. He just wasn't ready for that kind of heat.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by chinny »

This was the first fight I ever attended.

McCall was super motivated by Emmanuel Steward, who King, desperate to get his hands back on the heavyweight titles with Tyson approaching release, had hired.

Seeing McCall sprint past me some 30 minutes after the fight, green belt around his waist, followed by a whooping Don King, was a surreal moment.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

chinny wrote:This was the first fight I ever attended.

McCall was super motivated by Emmanuel Steward, who King, desperate to get his hands back on the heavyweight titles with Tyson approaching release, had hired.

Seeing McCall sprint past me some 30 minutes after the fight, green belt around his waist, followed by a whooping Don King, was a surreal moment.
:lol: ......sorry I just tried to imagine that. Sounds like a blummin getaway!

World titles to have a habit of making small teams end up in some unlikely places. I remember being at Hartlepool Borough Hall when Steve Molitor beat Michael Hunter. Everyone was a bit stunned except for about 3 Canadians jumping all over the show squirting water everywhere.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Kilburn wrote:McCall must have been at his peak that night against Lewis. Fit, sharp and very dangerous. Throw his iron chin into the mix and you have yourself a nightmare of an opponent.

I can't see how Lewis would have got McCall under control had the fight continued. He just wasn't ready for that kind of heat.
I remember Boxing Monthly at the time warning Lewis in the preview McCall was easily his most dangerous opponent to date. Regardless of records, they were right. McCall was a real monster. BM almost predicted Lewis's downfall.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by n1ebf »

same age in that fight. Both 29yrs old.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 33021
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Funnily enough Lewis was talking about this fight on Twitter yesterday, he never hinted it was a fluke shot, just said that his chin ended up on the end of a great punch.

In fact he gave most of the credit to Steward, apparently Manny booked all of the available quick heavyweights for sparring with McCall & focussed on speed in training camp, so Lewis could only get sparring against slow fighters & got used to facing slow shots so wasn't able to react quick enough on fight night.

I never heard this before, interesting if true & shows what a tactical genius Steward was. Lewis said it was those sort of tactics that convinced him Manny was the only trainer to go with from then on.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26488
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Lewis vs. McCall 1

Post by banjo »

It's mental when you consider that not only is McCall still fighting, he's still never been knocked off his feet and his only loss inside the distance was when he had his breakdown in the rematch with Lewis.
Post Reply