I suppose. Long way from being the most famous ever. He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatableThe Great John L wrote:Well, I'm not sure about the most famous ever, but he was arguably the most recognizable human during the 70's.Space Moutain wrote:Most famous? Uh, no.scallum wrote:Helped launch Ali into becoming the best heavyweight ever and probably the most famous human being planet Earth has seen. Have yet to see another heavy that could move like Ali did
How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
-
Space Moutain
- Middleweight
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 27 Jan 2014, 10:53
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
It was a great win, he was much better than Liston was expecting, and Liston spat his dummy out when he knew he was beaten. Simple.
Now the second fight has a horrible stench about it, no doubt in my mind. What happened? Only 'A Man' buried in Las Vegas knows.
Now the second fight has a horrible stench about it, no doubt in my mind. What happened? Only 'A Man' buried in Las Vegas knows.
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Monzon was a lowlife......that is not debateable.
Ali......not so easy to categorize......he did some lowlife things......probably like you and I have done. Mischief, and wrongminded hatred at different points in his life. Exploiting his fame....probably guilty of that. But not a murderer. Just a famous guy superlative at a certain craft with typical human foibles. And some of us who pretend our shyt don't stink love to vilify the "humanity" in others.
I wouldn't mind having him for a neighbor, even if I might prefer Joe Frazier living next door.
Monzon......well, I wouldn't have hesitated pulling the trigger on him if I caught him in the act.
But Lordy could Monzon fight and any clinical assessment of boxing should probably NOT take such things into account.
Now when simply rating or discussing a "sportsman". perhaps all such gossip, and drama is fair game.
Ali......not so easy to categorize......he did some lowlife things......probably like you and I have done. Mischief, and wrongminded hatred at different points in his life. Exploiting his fame....probably guilty of that. But not a murderer. Just a famous guy superlative at a certain craft with typical human foibles. And some of us who pretend our shyt don't stink love to vilify the "humanity" in others.
I wouldn't mind having him for a neighbor, even if I might prefer Joe Frazier living next door.
Monzon......well, I wouldn't have hesitated pulling the trigger on him if I caught him in the act.
But Lordy could Monzon fight and any clinical assessment of boxing should probably NOT take such things into account.
Now when simply rating or discussing a "sportsman". perhaps all such gossip, and drama is fair game.
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Please explain why he was a lowlife.Space Moutain wrote:He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatable
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Most often cited against Ali, was his politics, after that his chauvinism. And of course, like anyone who embraces spirituality, his personal acts that fell short of his personal dogma. And of course his ego. Pretty run of the mill human stuff.The Great John L wrote:Please explain why he was a lowlife.Space Moutain wrote:He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatable
-
Space Moutain
- Middleweight
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 27 Jan 2014, 10:53
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Hateful, racist, cheated on his women, trashed his opponents like no other athlete before him, stabbed Frazier in the back while fueling public hatred against him. Not gonna bring up him being a draft dodger though. I'll get some more later when I have the timeThe Great John L wrote:Please explain why he was a lowlife.Space Moutain wrote:He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatable
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
OIC. Have you known him for very long?Space Moutain wrote:Hateful, racist, cheated on his women, trashed his opponents like no other athlete before him, stabbed Frazier in the back while fueling public hatred against him. Not gonna bring up him being a draft dodger though. I'll get some more later when I have the timeThe Great John L wrote:Please explain why he was a lowlife.Space Moutain wrote:He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatable
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
A Very good win...one of Ali's 5 best wins I'm sure. I don't know where it ranks amongst All Time Heavyweight wins, but there have been some better ones. Nevertheless it was a great victory.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Il Duce wrote:Question to now ex-Champ Sonny Liston
Q > Sonny how do you feel after that loss to Young Cassius.
A > Excuse me while I sip my J & B Scotch and count my Cash.
-
Space Moutain
- Middleweight
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 27 Jan 2014, 10:53
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
OIC. Have you known him for very long?[/quote]The Great John L wrote: Hateful, racist, cheated on his women, trashed his opponents like no other athlete before him, stabbed Frazier in the back while fueling public hatred against him. Not gonna bring up him being a draft dodger though. I'll get some more later when I have the time
Probably not any longer than you have.
Clay was a pos as a father as well, btw. I can't in good conscience say he didn't deserve to get Parkinsons
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Quite simply.one of the worst things I've ever read on the internet.Space Moutain wrote: I can't in good conscience say he didn't deserve to get Parkinsons
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
That deserves a final warning or a ban I reckon.keithmoonhangover wrote:Quite simply.one of the worst things I've ever read on the internet.Space Moutain wrote: I can't in good conscience say he didn't deserve to get Parkinsons
-
Space Moutain
- Middleweight
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 27 Jan 2014, 10:53
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Please explain.Giancarlo wrote:That deserves a final warning or a ban I reckon.keithmoonhangover wrote:Quite simply.one of the worst things I've ever read on the internet.Space Moutain wrote: I can't in good conscience say he didn't deserve to get Parkinsons
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Are you a certified imbecile or something?Space Moutain wrote: Please explain.
-
Space Moutain
- Middleweight
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 27 Jan 2014, 10:53
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
No name calling, please.Giancarlo wrote:Are you a certified imbecile or something?Space Moutain wrote: Please explain.
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Draft dodger lol, so a third class cittizen is supposed to happily fight for a country that treats his kind as subhuman? LolSpace Moutain wrote:Hateful, racist, cheated on his women, trashed his opponents like no other athlete before him, stabbed Frazier in the back while fueling public hatred against him. Not gonna bring up him being a draft dodger though. I'll get some more later when I have the timeThe Great John L wrote:Please explain why he was a lowlife.Space Moutain wrote:He was also a lowlife, which I don't think is debatable
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
It's a medical condition; I wondered if you suffered from it.Space Moutain wrote:No name calling, please.Giancarlo wrote:Are you a certified imbecile or something?Space Moutain wrote: Please explain.
Re: How Do You Rate Clay's Win Over Liston?
Actually it is not a medical condition, but rather a "once upon a time" identifier for a place on the intelligence scale. One that the medical community often utilized in it's descriptors. There is no "good" or 'bad" health condition equated with an IQ quotient. I believe most of us can attest that there is an abundance of healthy examples of all the classifications listed below.
IQ Range Classification
70-80 Borderline deficiency
50-69 Moron
20-49 Imbecile
below 20 Idiot
So, as you can see, this thread has become at best, moronic. So it's time to lock it away, and let it slowly sink to the B.O.T.P. depths.
IQ Range Classification
70-80 Borderline deficiency
50-69 Moron
20-49 Imbecile
below 20 Idiot
So, as you can see, this thread has become at best, moronic. So it's time to lock it away, and let it slowly sink to the B.O.T.P. depths.