HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post Reply

Should The Sphinx be allowed in to the Hall Of Fame?

Poll ended at 22 Feb 2014, 11:09

Yes
1
10%
No
9
90%
 
Total votes: 10

Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Crease »

Michael Spinks (Managed by Kevo)

Image

Accolades:
Four Time World Champion

Unified Honours:
Unified WBC & WBO Titles (Week 26)

Individual Titles:
x2 time WBO (Weeks 10, 25)
x1 time WBC Champion (Week 26)
x1 time IBF Champion (Week 31)
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Crease »

kevo wrote: Michael "Only Built 4 Cuban" Spinx - 11(6)-2(0)-5

D10 Billy Conn * Pre-season
D10 Billy Conn
WMD 10 Jose Torres
WUD 10 Jose Torres
WUD 10 Tiger Jack Fox
WUD 10 Michel Moorer
D10 Sam Langford ~WBO Title Eliminator~
L UD Sam Langford
WTKO 9 Bob Fitzsimmons
WKO 9 Jack Delany
WTKO 9 Floyd Patterson ~WBO Title~
D12 Michael Moorer ~WBO Title~
D12 Billy Conn ~WBO Title~
WTKO 11 Floyd Patterson ~WBO Title~
L SD Ezzard Charles ~WBO Title~
W KO 1 Lloyd Marshall
W UD 12 Joey Maxim
W TKO 6 Gene Tunney
- Record was not completed by his Manager.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Crease »

YES........................................................NO
.........................................................Crease
........................................................gilgamesh
........................................................Techno89
...........................................................Kevo
.........................................................armageto
.........................................................naznaci1
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Crease »

NO.

My take on it is that Spinks did not achieve enough throughout the season. Nowhere near it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46293
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by gilgamesh »

No
Techno89
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 918
Joined: 11 Oct 2011, 13:26

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Techno89 »

NO
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by kevo »

No
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by HomicideHenry »

Spinks went 2-2 with Charles, making him the toughest opponent to Charles outside of Gibbons who went 1-1-1 with Charles...
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5259
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by armageto »

Voted no, can't see his whole body of work. He seemed to have a good, but not HOF type season....
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by kevo »

armageto wrote:Voted no, can't see his whole body of work. He seemed to have a good, but not HOF type season....
Wasn't able to get online as much as i'd like for this season, hence the lack of a full record. 'Good but not great' pretty much spot on.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4457
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by NazNaci1 »

Good but not great. I'd go with that.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: HOF Nomination: Michael Spinks

Post by Crease »

Official Result: NO (conclusively)
Post Reply