Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15174
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

If I have them mixed up, my apologies.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by King Carlos »

I'm thinking so. The first fight was close. I saw it as an impressive showing for both men.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I forgot to mention Vazquez, that was a great win.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by elmersalsa »

As far I am concerned, The great Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker WAS THE BEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by palooka »

elmersalsa wrote:As far I am concerned, The great Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker WAS THE BEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA.
Maybe the best boxer but I'd put Ricardo Lopez right there with him; Chavez Snr was the best fighter of that era (imo).
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Chavez could never out-fight Whitaker, though I understand what you're getting at. Even then, Holyfield > Chavez.
Post Reply