Restricted view is a bit different if you are watching a playing area as big as a football pitch compared to one as small as a boxing ring 40-50 yards away.expe wrote:If the seats can be used for football, they can be used for boxing, if there's a restricted view, the seats will be sold for less and there won't be loads, that main stand is the smallest in the ground and not every seat will be restricted. The lower seats can still be used, it's just that the view won't be great, no different to the front row of the raised seating in an arena. Hatton had 55,000 in at City and it only holds 47,000, the safety certificate won't be a problem, as long as there's enough exits so everyone can leave quickly if there's a fire or something like that.gobbles wrote:Not that easy because 1: some lower seats are unusable if people are on the pitch. 2: Just because people are on the pitch that does not raise capacity, because there is a safety certificate for only a certain amount of people. 3: Apparently the old main stand had loads of seats that can't be used for boxing because of terrible viewsjessi wrote:City ground seats over 30,500 for football, surely that means 35,000 - 38,000 for boxing ?
Generally it seems that compared to football, boxing raises the capacity by at least 8,000, for the City Ground that would mean a capacity of 38,500 minimum.
You cannot simply upgrade your safety certificate for bigger crowds. For Dave Coldwell's recent show at Ice Sheffield, for instance, half the rinkside seats were roped off as the safety certificate was for a set number, which did not include people sat on what was normally the ice. To get a bigger safety certificate, they would have to hold a trial event with a larger crowd, to show that there were enough exits in case of an emergency. I have no idea what access is like to the pitch at Forest, but if they have to gain entry through a stand, this is a problem.