Boxrec ratings

Post Reply
telboy66
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Nov 2007, 11:11

Boxrec ratings

Post by telboy66 »

Can someone explain to me how the Boxrec ratings are contrived,just been looking at the British Super Feather Weight rating and there is a boxer ( Romeo Romero) rated at 15 after only 2 bouts against very mediocre opposition yet there are active boxers with more wins below him,I know Romeo is a flamboyant guy that the fans will either love or hate and may get bums on seats but surely a boxer should only be rated on ring record not on how he looks
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by maley1984 »

I've noticed this myself a few times and at different weights. I use them as a rough guide and to check on peoples records.
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by daviddee »

His opponents were better than most who start out!! I think Romeo had a close fight with Rogowski who is a decent enough boxer.. These guys might not look good on paper but both lads Romeo has faced are hard opponents for first 2 fights
JimStone
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 27 Oct 2018, 03:43

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by JimStone »

heisenberg
Middleweight
Posts: 21
Joined: 11 Oct 2013, 08:06

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by heisenberg »

I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by orbtastic »

heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
http://boxrec.com/ratings.php
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by maley1984 »

heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
Their r no offical ranking system in place for the british boxing board mate
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by Anzi »

maley1984 wrote:
heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
Their r no offical ranking system in place for the british boxing board mate
None at all, leaves the door open to manipulation in the industry.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by maley1984 »

Anzi wrote:
maley1984 wrote:
heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
Their r no offical ranking system in place for the british boxing board mate
None at all, leaves the door open to manipulation in the industry.

Their hav been a few threads on here about it b4 I think. Yeah it does and certain big promoters seem to benefit from it for their fighters. Shocking really
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by palooka »

maley1984 wrote:
heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
Their r no offical ranking system in place for the british boxing board mate



They should give horse a job.
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by maley1984 »

palooka wrote:
maley1984 wrote:
heisenberg wrote:I have been trying to find the English/British boxing rankings, but no luck. Just lots of opinion rankings.

Any ideas?
Their r no offical ranking system in place for the british boxing board mate



They should give horse a job.

Ill do if the money good and free tickets to shows lol :TU:
telboy66
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Nov 2007, 11:11

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by telboy66 »

Anyone that still thinks that BBBOC run boxing in Britain must also believe in the tooth fairy the big promoters run every aspect of boxing from who gets the fights and in some cases whether they get paid for boxing,if they had any power all boxers would have their pay backed up by the board,as it is boxers pay the board for their licence yet when things go tits up the board remain silent,any promoter wishing to work under the board must lodge a £ 20,000 bond with board but this is way bellow what's needed to pay for even a small hall show today
jam100
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 76
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:42

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by jam100 »

It is amazing really, you would have though that it would be to the benefit of everyone, promoter, board, fans and boxers themselves to have a ranking system - which in theory would create more 50/50 fights, that said suppose it depends on who is controlling or influencing the rankings
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by daviddee »

telboy66 wrote:Anyone that still thinks that BBBOC run boxing in Britain must also believe in the tooth fairy the big promoters run every aspect of boxing from who gets the fights and in some cases whether they get paid for boxing,if they had any power all boxers would have their pay backed up by the board,as it is boxers pay the board for their licence yet when things go tits up the board remain silent,any promoter wishing to work under the board must lodge a £ 20,000 bond with board but this is way bellow what's needed to pay for even a small hall show today
Is it not a 10,000 bond?
telboy66
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Nov 2007, 11:11

Re: Boxrec ratings

Post by telboy66 »

I have been told it's £20,000 now but if it is only £10,000 it's even more farcical
Post Reply