Betting thread

domjon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 22 Apr 2009, 19:41

Re: Betting thread

Post by domjon »

WelshJack wrote:Just something to keep me interested in the terrible Scottish card this weekend (apart from the main event of course)
Appleby
Simpson
Burns
£10 returns £415

can see Appleby and Burns possibly getting a result but Simpson surely too small?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Betting thread

Post by expe »

domjon wrote:
WelshJack wrote:Just something to keep me interested in the terrible Scottish card this weekend (apart from the main event of course)
Appleby
Simpson
Burns
£10 returns £415

can see Appleby and Burns possibly getting a result but Simpson surely too small?
Depends how much Murray has left and Simpson's tactics, if he meets him head on then Murray will win regardless because of pure size and strength, if he moves though and Murray's not what he once was, Simpson's in with a chance.
domjon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 22 Apr 2009, 19:41

Re: Betting thread

Post by domjon »

expe wrote:
domjon wrote:
WelshJack wrote:Just something to keep me interested in the terrible Scottish card this weekend (apart from the main event of course)
Appleby
Simpson
Burns
£10 returns £415

can see Appleby and Burns possibly getting a result but Simpson surely too small?
Depends how much Murray has left and Simpson's tactics, if he meets him head on then Murray will win regardless because of pure size and strength, if he moves though and Murray's not what he once was, Simpson's in with a chance.
yeah but simpson not exactly known for fighting clever, no chance imo
JayMc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:30

Re: Betting thread

Post by JayMc »

expe wrote:
domjon wrote:
WelshJack wrote:Just something to keep me interested in the terrible Scottish card this weekend (apart from the main event of course)
Appleby
Simpson
Burns
£10 returns £415

can see Appleby and Burns possibly getting a result but Simpson surely too small?
Depends how much Murray has left and Simpson's tactics, if he meets him head on then Murray will win regardless because of pure size and strength, if he moves though and Murray's not what he once was, Simpson's in with a chance.
Murray to win by stoppage. Can't find any odds on it though :evil:
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Betting thread

Post by WelshJack »

I am more of a lumper on favourites I am up to £600 from a tenner. I agree Simpson will probably let me down, but worth a shot.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16798
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Betting thread

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Latest longshot accumulator punt:

Crawford stoppage
Pac decision
Froch stoppage
Malik Scott

61/1.

Annoyed I couldn't get the money on Scott stoppage, feel like there will be great value there. If Malik wins he does it by riding out the storm and catching that glass chin with something.
I fancy a Scott stoppage as well. I think he might win inside 3.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

You backing Crawford Keith?

The difference between Scott outright and Scott stoppage will probably be 7/2 against 6/1 or something which is huge when you consider how unlikely it is for he fight to go 12 given Deontay's power, bad chin and openness, and Scott very capable of being stopped too.
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Betting thread

Post by WelshJack »

Riddick Blowe wrote:You backing Crawford Keith?

The difference between Scott outright and Scott stoppage will probably be 7/2 against 6/1 or something which is huge when you consider how unlikely it is for he fight to go 12 given Deontay's power, bad chin and openness, and Scott very capable of being stopped too.
I'm not confident lumping on Crawford due to the fact he might get robbed.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Betting thread

Post by expe »

WelshJack wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:You backing Crawford Keith?

The difference between Scott outright and Scott stoppage will probably be 7/2 against 6/1 or something which is huge when you consider how unlikely it is for he fight to go 12 given Deontay's power, bad chin and openness, and Scott very capable of being stopped too.
I'm not confident lumping on Crawford due to the fact he might get robbed.
I'm not confident because I don't think he's anywhere near as good as some people seem to think he is.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Betting thread

Post by Hagler2002 »

Well it's that time again and I'll be putting my obligatory lump on anyone Burns is fighting!
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Betting thread

Post by The Insider »

Hagler2002 wrote:Well it's that time again and I'll be putting my obligatory lump on anyone Burns is fighting!
:D
You've got some lumping to do then as he hasn't lost for a while. Burns has done me proud in the past so I can't bring
myself to bet against him even though I think he may lose this one. He could make it difficult for Crawford behind the jab mind.

Can't help but think Simpson Might turn Murray over if he doesn't stand in front of him. Gonna have a lite nibble at that but there isn't much I fancy this weekend.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I implore you all. Bet on Crawford. I have seen the future and he wins easily.

I AKS YOU...TO DO THE RIGHT THING!!!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Betting thread

Post by palooka »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I implore you all. Bet on Crawford. I have seen the future and he wins easily.

I AKS YOU...TO DO THE RIGHT THING!!!
Sale or return Riddick?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

You have nothing to worry about.

This is my betting thread and the bet is Crawford!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Betting thread

Post by expe »

The Insider wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Well it's that time again and I'll be putting my obligatory lump on anyone Burns is fighting!
:D
You've got some lumping to do then as he hasn't lost for a while. Burns has done me proud in the past so I can't bring
myself to bet against him even though I think he may lose this one. He could make it difficult for Crawford behind the jab mind.

Can't help but think Simpson Might turn Murray over if he doesn't stand in front of him. Gonna have a lite nibble at that but there isn't much I fancy this weekend.
Takes a brave man to bet against Ricky Burns, the amount of times he has proved people wrong is unbelievable, right the way back to fighting Graham Earl, who was 20 odd fights unbeaten British champion, in London on 2 days notice in his 10th fight and winning. The jab is the key, if he misses, he has to double it up so Crawford can't counter, then throw the right hand and maybe throw the first to the chest so Crawford can't slip it, then bring the right hand over the top, if he finds the range with the jab, Crawford's in trouble because there'll be nothing to counter and he'll have to walk through the jab and more to get his own punches off.

Simpson's problem has always been that he stands in front of people too much, as Selby proved, a clever boxer can pick him off and I think it's a bit late to change, although Murray's never been known for outboxing people.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

We're all broken records on this.

Anyone got any other tips?
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Betting thread

Post by reggaereggae »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Latest longshot accumulator punt:

Crawford stoppage
Pac decision
Froch stoppage
Malik Scott

61/1.

Annoyed I couldn't get the money on Scott stoppage, feel like there will be great value there. If Malik wins he does it by riding out the storm and catching that glass chin with something.
I fancy a Scott stoppage as well. I think he might win inside 3.
Really??? I have seen Wilder improve a lot in his last few fights and whilst a Scott win is not impossible I think he will crumble
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Betting thread

Post by expe »

Riddick Blowe wrote:We're all broken records on this.

Anyone got any other tips?
What are the odds like on Stieglitz-Abraham, Salido-Lomachenko and Chavez Jr-Vera, if Chavez is better than evens he might be worth a punt because they'll just rob Vera anyway.
His Royness
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 25
Joined: 04 Dec 2008, 14:01

Re: Betting thread

Post by His Royness »

expe wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:We're all broken records on this.

Anyone got any other tips?
What are the odds like on Stieglitz-Abraham, Salido-Lomachenko and Chavez Jr-Vera, if Chavez is better than evens he might be worth a punt because they'll just rob Vera anyway.

:OhYes:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

expe wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:We're all broken records on this.

Anyone got any other tips?
What are the odds like on Stieglitz-Abraham, Salido-Lomachenko and Chavez Jr-Vera, if Chavez is better than evens he might be worth a punt because they'll just rob Vera anyway.
Better than evens? :o
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Betting thread

Post by expe »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
expe wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:We're all broken records on this.

Anyone got any other tips?
What are the odds like on Stieglitz-Abraham, Salido-Lomachenko and Chavez Jr-Vera, if Chavez is better than evens he might be worth a punt because they'll just rob Vera anyway.
Better than evens? :o
He should be since Vera won the first fight on any unbiased scorecard.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

So apparently Sportingbet think it's cool to not bother having simple stoppage market odds on the day of a big fight.

Rosie N: Welcome to Sportingbet! Please hold while I check all the information you supplied.
Rosie N: Unfortunately we've got to wait until they get back to us with either a yes or no once we've contacted them
Rosie N: We can't email them again in a space of less than 24hrs
You: OK but every other bookie has these odds, don't understand why this book doesn't
Rosie N: Unfortunately each book makers do business differently. We do offer other markets that others don't but on request, we can always look into the issue and where possible, the market will be offered.
Rosie N: Apologies for the delay
You: So some bookies wait until a few hours before the event to open a simple market that all competitors have had covered for weeks
You: got it
Rosie N: That is the traders decision sir, but hopefully they will offer you the prices
You: seems your traders need to lay off the donuts and get to work, I would happily replace them as an oddsmaker if they can't be bothered with simple markets
You: just some feedback there
Rosie N: Thanks
Rosie N: Is there anything else I can assist you with?
You: No thanks
You: Send my love to your traders
You: Actually, don't
Rosie N: I will, Cheers,
Rosie N: Oh! OK, I will not then
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Betting thread

Post by Hagler2002 »

Just had a nice football accumulator up so going to chuck £300 at a Crawford stoppage.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Betting thread

Post by The Insider »

Riddick Blowe wrote:So apparently Sportingbet think it's cool to not bother having simple stoppage market odds on the day of a big fight.

Rosie N: Welcome to Sportingbet! Please hold while I check all the information you supplied.
Rosie N: Unfortunately we've got to wait until they get back to us with either a yes or no once we've contacted them
Rosie N: We can't email them again in a space of less than 24hrs
You: OK but every other bookie has these odds, don't understand why this book doesn't
Rosie N: Unfortunately each book makers do business differently. We do offer other markets that others don't but on request, we can always look into the issue and where possible, the market will be offered.
Rosie N: Apologies for the delay
You: So some bookies wait until a few hours before the event to open a simple market that all competitors have had covered for weeks
You: got it
Rosie N: That is the traders decision sir, but hopefully they will offer you the prices
You: seems your traders need to lay off the donuts and get to work, I would happily replace them as an oddsmaker if they can't be bothered with simple markets
You: just some feedback there
Rosie N: Thanks
Rosie N: Is there anything else I can assist you with?
You: No thanks
You: Send my love to your traders
You: Actually, don't
Rosie N: I will, Cheers,
Rosie N: Oh! OK, I will not then
Probably a pain in the a$$ moving funds about but bet365 are going 15/8 for the Crawford stoppage which is quite a bit better than the other major books.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Betting thread

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

I know mate but I've just opened the account so want to do the free bet thing.

And still it isn't up. Unbelievable

Apparently Winner is offering a bonus of up to £200, never seen that before. I wish it was as simple as stake £200 and get a free bet to be staked on odds of 1/2 or longer, but all of these sites now seem to release their bonuses in bloody increments, useless. Have to check the small print for all of them. Sportingbet told me that I couldn't even put an accumulator on to release the free bet without EACH leg in the accumulator being 1/2 or longer. How retarded is that?
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 01 Mar 2014, 13:57, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply