PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FINAL

WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by WelshJack »

JCS wrote:
WelshJack wrote:Can someone explain what scores it has to be for a decision to be close or wide. I'm very confused.
CLOSE = Fight's decision is a split decision, majority decision, or a unanimous decision where the total difference in points are 9 (7 for 10-rounder) or less for the winning fighter.

WIDE = Fight's decision is a unanimous decision where the total difference in points are between 10 and 21 (8 and 17 for 10-rounder) for the winning fighter.

DOMINANT = Fight's decision is a unanimous decision where the total difference in points is 22 (18 for 10-rounder) or more for the winning fighter.
This is with the 3 judges scores combined right.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by JCS »

WelshJack wrote:
JCS wrote:
WelshJack wrote:Can someone explain what scores it has to be for a decision to be close or wide. I'm very confused.
CLOSE = Fight's decision is a split decision, majority decision, or a unanimous decision where the total difference in points are 9 (7 for 10-rounder) or less for the winning fighter.

WIDE = Fight's decision is a unanimous decision where the total difference in points are between 10 and 21 (8 and 17 for 10-rounder) for the winning fighter.

DOMINANT = Fight's decision is a unanimous decision where the total difference in points is 22 (18 for 10-rounder) or more for the winning fighter.
This is with the 3 judges scores combined right.
You ever see a boxer win by 22 points on one card?
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by claudevsq »

:OhYes: Hey, JCS, c'mon, Klitschko vs. Povetkin was not FAR off, TBH...
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by claudevsq »

Finally... Mayweather vs. Maidana on may 3rd... :TU:
Duch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 26 Feb 2012, 18:26

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by Duch »

Are there some rules about how many fights we will try to predict and how many of them will be multiplied by 1,25; 1,5; 1,75 and 2?
What can I expect?
Last edited by Duch on 25 Feb 2014, 18:12, edited 1 time in total.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by claudevsq »

Mares vs. Miura on Mayweather undercard... has apparently been confirmed in Tokyo yesterday...
CrazyHorse
Cruiserweight
Posts: 509
Joined: 19 Apr 2011, 14:46

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by CrazyHorse »

Got 1 wrong. FML. I went crazy after getting the last fight wrong and was going to use up all my x2 and x3. Cooled down and only put x3 down on the Leo Santa Cruz fight :box:



Sickens me I got the last fight wrong, should have watched more tape on both fighters. Lesson learned :TU:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by claudevsq »

Apr-12: Allakhverdiev - Vargas (sorry)
Apr-19: Hopkins - Shumenov :TU:
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by WelshJack »

I have 0 points yet backed Crawford and Chavez?
ZEVASTIAN50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:07

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by ZEVASTIAN50 »

jcs sorry to bother it seems i am missing a fight. i dont know which one. whenever you have a chance can you check? thanks
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by JCS »

WelshJack wrote:I have 0 points yet backed Crawford and Chavez?
You HAVE to put the comma after your name.
WelshJack wrote:WelshJack, Stieglitz, decision, close
WelshJack Crawford, decision, close, x3
WelshJack Lomachenko, KO, Round 9
WelshJack Chavez, decision, wide
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by JCS »

ZEVASTIAN50 wrote:jcs sorry to bother it seems i am missing a fight. i dont know which one. whenever you have a chance can you check? thanks
ZEVASTIAN50,BUTE,DECISION,WIDE
ZEVASTIAN50,BARTHELEMY,DECISION,CLOSE
ZEVASTIAN50,CRAWFORD,DECISION,CLOSE
ZEVASTIAN50,PETERSON,KO,R6
ZEVASTIAN50,STIEGLITZ,DECISION,WIDE
ZEVASTIAN50,CHAVEZ,KO,R6
ZEVASTIAN50,LOMACHENKO,DECISION,WIDE
Duch
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 26 Feb 2012, 18:26

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by Duch »

Duch wrote:Are there some rules about how many fights we will try to predict and how many of them will be multiplied by 1,25; 1,5; 1,75 and 2?
What can I expect?
JCS?

And another question: why commas are so important?

I sucked this time. I thought that Salido would win but when I saw that almost everybody chose Lomachenko, I did it too. I shouldn't look at other people's guessing. :P
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - FEB 22

Post by JCS »

Duch wrote:Are there some rules about how many fights we will try to predict and how many of them will be multiplied by 1,25; 1,5; 1,75 and 2?
No.

Last year we had 59 fights: 0.50x - 4, 1.00x - 35, 1.25x - 12, 1.50x - 4, 1.75x - 1, 2.00x - 3
Year before we had 51 fights: 1.00x - 31, 1.25x - 13, 1.50x - 1, 1.75x- 3, 2.00x - 3
Duch wrote: And another question: why commas are so important?
Because I use software to automatically parse the threads and it helps protect against things like quoting other members' picks, etc.
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by WelshJack »

JCS wrote:
WelshJack wrote:I have 0 points yet backed Crawford and Chavez?
You HAVE to put the comma after your name.
WelshJack wrote:WelshJack, Stieglitz, decision, close
WelshJack Crawford, decision, close, x3
WelshJack Lomachenko, KO, Round 9
WelshJack Chavez, decision, wide
Oh man I was top too.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by JCS »

WelshJack wrote:
JCS wrote:
WelshJack wrote:I have 0 points yet backed Crawford and Chavez?
You HAVE to put the comma after your name.
WelshJack wrote:WelshJack, Stieglitz, decision, close
WelshJack Crawford, decision, close, x3
WelshJack Lomachenko, KO, Round 9
WelshJack Chavez, decision, wide
Oh man I was top too.
I fixed it.

Follow pick format next time please.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by claudevsq »

Jun-21: Chris Arreola - Bermane Stiverne (for vacant WBC heavyweight title) :TU:
CrazyHorse
Cruiserweight
Posts: 509
Joined: 19 Apr 2011, 14:46

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by CrazyHorse »

Stiverne decision close :box:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 2

Post by claudevsq »

Apr-19: Peter Quillin - Lukaš Konečný :TU:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by claudevsq »

May-2: Erislandy Lara - Ishe Smith :TU:
Apr-12: Khabib Allakhverdiev - Jessie Vargas (5 stars)
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by scallum »

I think I may hhave messed up format because only got .20 points from last week but picked 2,correct fights and one perfect, Thanks
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by scallum »

I'm sorry I inadvertently used Canelo first name instead of using Alvarez
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by JCS »

Everyone is fixed except for ZEVASTIAN... needs to show me which fight I missed, too lazy to look.

Scoring bug also fixed which was jipping people 1 point by being off by one on the DECISION type. Props to joe strong.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by claudevsq »

JCS, the May-2 fight between Lara and Smith is a 5-star, just like Allakhverdiev vs. Vargas. What about the female 5-star-fight between Persoon and Farías, btw? Novelty fight? :TU:
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6246
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: PTBF 2014 - RULES & STANDINGS THREAD - MAR 9

Post by JCS »

claudevsq wrote:JCS, the May-2 fight between Lara and Smith is a 5-star, just like Allakhverdiev vs. Vargas. What about the female 5-star-fight between Persoon and Farías, btw? Novelty fight? :TU:
The first two are in.
Post Reply