38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post Reply
fightscorecollector
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 473
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07

38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by fightscorecollector »

How did you all score the fight??, should be fairly straight forward scoring in this one.

Who would you like both guys to fight next??

http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/latest/ ... xing-press

Comments welcome
JimStone
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 27 Oct 2018, 03:43

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by JimStone »

I gave it to Crawford 119-109.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23250
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by handsofstone »

Crawford 119-110
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Final round »

119-110
Last edited by Final round on 03 Mar 2014, 16:19, edited 1 time in total.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by reggaereggae »

I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by expe »

116-113
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by expe »

reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Finn »

expe wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.
I thought many of the rounds were close but Crawford still won them, i only gave Burns 2 or 3 rounds from what i remember.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by crusader »

expe wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:I thought it was much closer and the commentary was very biased. 116-112 seemed about right
Yes, Burns missed a lot, but Crawford didn't throw much in some of the rounds, he probably nicked a couple purely on workrate.
Crawford landed more in pretty much every round, even when his workrate is low. Ricky doesn't deserve rounds just for throwing.

116-112 and 116-113 do not seem about right to me.
johnreilly
Super Middleweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 14 Jan 2013, 07:43

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by johnreilly »

I had it 119-111, round 3 to Burns and round 11 even, the rest to Crawford. Crawford was in control almost for the whole fight and Burns didn't seem to come close to causing him any problems. Commentry was very annoying with Watt going on about Crawford boxing southpaw. He was using it to good effect, keeping Burns out of range and controlling the pace, then switching back to orthodox to deliver fast hard hits to back Burns up.
jamiedavies02
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 158
Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:26

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by jamiedavies02 »

I scored it in a very pro-Burns manner, giving every round you could make a case for Burns for for him...

Still had it 115-113 Crawford.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Final round »

Burns said the ref kept breaking them up and wouldn't let him work on the inside.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by whiskey »

expe wrote:116-113

Wow, just wow.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by TheGman »

Burns lost nearly every round,he was fightin like a guy scared to throw a shot cause he would get countered. Nit the burns of old or just crawford is that tricky and slick.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5525
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by forcefraser »

119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by expe »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Would have liked to see him try and walk through Crawford's punches to try and grind him down, but maybe he felt like the punches would fall short because Crawford used the reach advantage really well.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Final round »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Datsue »

Final round wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
forcefraser wrote:119-110. It was a very clear victory for Crawford. Poor display by Burns.
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by expe »

Datsue wrote:
Final round wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Don't see what Burns could have done differently at all.

I think I had it 10-2 Crawford and those two could have gone either way. Burns didn't clearly win any round.
Done more work on the inside

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.
Hardly noticed the ref, apart from Jim Watt suggesting point deductions, he left them to it for the most part, the right way for me.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: 38 Boxing writers Score Burns-Crawford

Post by Final round »

Datsue wrote:

He'd have to learn to fight on the inside first.

That quote about the ref breaking it up is hilarious-he did nothing but either stand there with the earmuffs on or flail about to grab hold. The Yank was the only one willing & able to work inside.
Exactly but at least he's realised the lack of inside work was an issue in the fight but he's laying the blame in the wrong place
Post Reply