Tyson interview on ITV.

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Tyson interview on ITV.

Post by stujones »

What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9017
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Post by Syntax Error »

I missed this, when was it on?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Syntax Error wrote:I missed this, when was it on?
Nelson vs Cantatore bill
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9017
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Post by Syntax Error »

stujones wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:I missed this, when was it on?
Nelson vs Cantatore bill
Thanks.

That's why I missed it; I've boycotted all Nelson fights, since his abysmal performance in the Warring fight in 1992! I thought he would have learnt from the DeLeon farce in 1990, but alas, no, he was just as bad against Warring!!!! :TU:
Exile
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 239
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 13:55

Post by Exile »

Any links?
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Tyson interview on ITV.

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

stujones wrote:What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?
He has no hunger, less speed, less power and most importantly hasn't the energy/stamina to have the high volume high action fighting style which is the only way he knows how to fight.

Against Holy he was a 5round fighter (although still fought well but not well enough after R5), against Lewis/Williams he was a 1round fighter, against McBride he tried to change his style to fight at a slower pace for 12rounds - it didnt work.

Hes totally shot - he still has the strength, some speed all the technique - but he can't produce the frantic pace which made him a legend
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Tyson doesn't even have the technique any more, he stopped using Cus D'amato's system, relatively early in his career, and became a more straight forward slugger with less defence. His handspeed is still pretty impressive for his age, but without the output he's just not that good.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Tyson interview on ITV.

Post by stujones »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
stujones wrote:What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?
He has no hunger, less speed, less power and most importantly hasn't the energy/stamina to have the high volume high action fighting style which is the only way he knows how to fight.

Against Holy he was a 5round fighter (although still fought well but not well enough after R5), against Lewis/Williams he was a 1round fighter, against McBride he tried to change his style to fight at a slower pace for 12rounds - it didnt work.

Hes totally shot - he still has the strength, some speed all the technique - but he can't produce the frantic pace which made him a legend
Is this due to age or the way he has been training, or a combination of both?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Both, Tyson has been abusing himself for a long long time now, he's not trained hard for fights for over a decade and he's almost 40, so there's no surprise.

Plus, there is zero mystique about the man, he's been battered to defeat by Williams and now McBride, the aura of fear has gone, and that was always one of his most potent weapons.
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

I think Tyson can come back and unify the titles if only he will dedicate himself. C'mon Mike I know you can do it.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Is that a joke? Please tell me you are joking....

He can't even beat Kevin McBride for fucks sake.
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

Mike just ran out of steam against Mcbride, for the early rounds he looked like the old Mike.

Against Danny Williams he was injured.

Against Lennox Lewis he kept smashing his face against Lewis's fists, otherwise he would surely have won the unified titles there and then in 2002.

In the division is so weak, if Tyson would just take back Rooney, be 21 years old again and get some heart, fitness and desire he could be the best again!

Of course I was phucking joking, I just couldn't believe the thread I was reading....
Last edited by Goz on 06 Dec 2005, 10:31, edited 1 time in total.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Post by J »

and the post of the year award goes to...GOz :lol: :TU:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Exile wrote:Any links?
Try http://www.allegedly.tv, i don't think Johnny Nelson has his own website.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

According to the back of Brendan's t-shirt Friday he does have a website.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

Could we assume the Johnny Nelson website doesn't get hit a lot?
BunglesFingers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by BunglesFingers »

I have to say that I would rather look at Jonny's website than watch his fights these days.

Does a great job as a pundit :TU:

As for Tyson, no he should never go back and he has said the same old bollocks many times before.
Post Reply