His rtotal has dropped from the last post-fight total but Arreola (et al) haven't overhauled it. He'll drop off the ratings altogether in March if he doesn't fight since then. It's more the fault of the rest of the division for not being able to put together enough meaningful fights to overtake him,Cap wrote:I see Roberts Helenius is ranked 5th despite not fighting since March.
Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Anybody know why Ukrainian cruiser Roman Golovashchenko hasn't a rating. He fought a little over a month ago beating heavyweight Yakup Saglam. Presumably he's retired?
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
His record is set to complete.Cholo_cws wrote:Anybody know why Ukrainian cruiser Roman Golovashchenko hasn't a rating. He fought a little over a month ago beating heavyweight Yakup Saglam. Presumably he's retired?
But you may ask your question here:
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Boxrec had Szpilka rated #33 and Jennings 31. So how did they bump Jennings all the way up to #13 by beating a #33 guy?
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Boxrec ratings do not work on ranks but on points.x2x wrote:Boxrec had Szpilka rated #33 and Jennings 31. So how did they bump Jennings all the way up to #13 by beating a #33 guy?
Jennings was #28 before the bout.
All boxers between ranks 13 and 28 are very close, only some 100 points difference. So Jeggings could step up a lot of ranks by a points woin of 106.
-
bobbyboxing
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 02 May 2012, 21:54
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
HOW IS ALBERTO GARZA RATED 13 IN WORLD 126 THE WBA WORLD CHAMPION WHO KO'S HIM IN 4 RDS NICK WALTERS NOT RATED IN TOP 50 ???? YOU WANT TO TELL ME WHAT THAT IS ABOUT
BOBBY BOXING
BOBBY BOXING
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I have a curious one that I can't really explain.. it just seems strange.
Mikaela Lauren lost to Christina Hammer which reduced her point total from 18 to 16.
In Lauren's very next fight, she dropped a division. Based on what I'm seeing, her 16 points turned into 18... fair enough.
However, in beating a 0 point opponent (an opponent who never had 1 point), Lauren went from 18 to 25 points.... 9 points higher than where she was post-Hammer.
My thought is that this is some unforeseen side effect of the tiered launching... but I'm not sure it makes sense in this case.
Mikaela Lauren lost to Christina Hammer which reduced her point total from 18 to 16.
In Lauren's very next fight, she dropped a division. Based on what I'm seeing, her 16 points turned into 18... fair enough.
However, in beating a 0 point opponent (an opponent who never had 1 point), Lauren went from 18 to 25 points.... 9 points higher than where she was post-Hammer.
My thought is that this is some unforeseen side effect of the tiered launching... but I'm not sure it makes sense in this case.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I guess, a side effect of the tiered launching, yes - I don't like it ...JCS wrote:I have a curious one that I can't really explain.. it just seems strange.
Mikaela Lauren lost to Christina Hammer which reduced her point total from 18 to 16.
In Lauren's very next fight, she dropped a division. Based on what I'm seeing, her 16 points turned into 18... fair enough.
However, in beating a 0 point opponent (an opponent who never had 1 point), Lauren went from 18 to 25 points.... 9 points higher than where she was post-Hammer.
My thought is that this is some unforeseen side effect of the tiered launching... but I'm not sure it makes sense in this case.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
The annual ratings 2010s pages seem to end with the year 2010. Is there a place on the site to find top ranked individuals and bouts for the years since then?
Thanks.
Thanks.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
... 3 years missing -squiggy wrote:The annual ratings 2010s pages seem to end with the year 2010. Is there a place on the site to find top ranked individuals and bouts for the years since then?
Thanks.
I will have do get in touch with it ...
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I was under t/impression (and it's been a while) that BOXREC always places a pug in t/last weight class he fought at? Is that true,or was it true as I see Canelo still at 154 after that disgusting 155lb. deal,hell if he needed another pound for that fight ... (THEN PUT HIM IN W/T/MIDDLEWEIGHTS) and yes ratings r a complicated thing,(so many factors)and PC's run everything. But has it been or not been your policy to rank a fighter on his last fight weight???
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
The editors assign a boxer to a weight division - it is not the ratings.daniel973 wrote:I was under t/impression (and it's been a while) that BOXREC always places a pug in t/last weight class he fought at? Is that true,or was it true as I see Canelo still at 154 after that disgusting 155lb. deal,hell if he needed another pound for that fight ... (THEN PUT HIM IN W/T/MIDDLEWEIGHTS) and yes ratings r a complicated thing,(so many factors)and PC's run everything. But has it been or not been your policy to rank a fighter on his last fight weight???
The boxer should be assigned to a division because:
- he or his manager declared he will fight there
- he had his most important bouts in this division recently
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Can someone please explain what happened with Tony Thompson and Solis's ratings, to change them again? After their fight, it was updated, and yesterday Thompson had moved to 428 points (I remember he was tied but ranked beneath Chisora). Today, it's been changed again, Thompson is down two spots, and has only 372 points, and Solis moves back up five spots from his position in yesterday's heavyweight rankings.
How did this happen?
How did this happen?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Someone probably changed the result to a UD and then changed it after the ratings calc'd. Just a guess.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
That'd make sense. Thanks.JCS wrote:Someone probably changed the result to a UD and then changed it after the ratings calc'd. Just a guess.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Noticed this too. Even if the result had been entered as a UD, why would Wilder, Arreola, and Stiverne move 2 places rather than just behind/ahead of Thompson?knurak wrote:Can someone please explain what happened with Tony Thompson and Solis's ratings, to change them again? After their fight, it was updated, and yesterday Thompson had moved to 428 points (I remember he was tied but ranked beneath Chisora). Today, it's been changed again, Thompson is down two spots, and has only 372 points, and Solis moves back up five spots from his position in yesterday's heavyweight rankings.
How did this happen?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
That part I can explain. It's the timing with Helenius being removed for inactivity.crusader wrote:Noticed this too. Even if the result had been entered as a UD, why would Wilder, Arreola, and Stiverne move 2 places rather than just behind/ahead of Thompson?knurak wrote:Can someone please explain what happened with Tony Thompson and Solis's ratings, to change them again? After their fight, it was updated, and yesterday Thompson had moved to 428 points (I remember he was tied but ranked beneath Chisora). Today, it's been changed again, Thompson is down two spots, and has only 372 points, and Solis moves back up five spots from his position in yesterday's heavyweight rankings.
How did this happen?
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Has there been a major tweak lately? I've noticed some significant jumps in the ratings by some boxers.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
No - what changes please?Ric wrote:Has there been a major tweak lately? I've noticed some significant jumps in the ratings by some boxers.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Can someone who works on the database tell me what the shortest turnaround between title fights ever is? I can't think of an efficient way to look that up myself.
Just to be clear, I mean the shortest time ever between a fighter defending(or winning) his title and then defending it again.
Just to be clear, I mean the shortest time ever between a fighter defending(or winning) his title and then defending it again.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Thanks mate. I thought you were being sarcasticBobbyptsd wrote:Can someone who works on the database tell me what the shortest turnaround between title fights ever is? I can't think of an efficient way to look that up myself.
Just to be clear, I mean the shortest time ever between a fighter defending(or winning) his title and then defending it again.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
No problem, I figure one of the guys here can probably check that.columbo wrote:Thanks mate. I thought you were being sarcasticBobbyptsd wrote:Can someone who works on the database tell me what the shortest turnaround between title fights ever is? I can't think of an efficient way to look that up myself.
Just to be clear, I mean the shortest time ever between a fighter defending(or winning) his title and then defending it again.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
You really get your answer - listed all titles by division with a boxer defendiing his title successfully within less than 20 days:Bobbyptsd wrote:No problem, I figure one of the guys here can probably check that.columbo wrote:Thanks mate. I thought you were being sarcasticBobbyptsd wrote:Can someone who works on the database tell me what the shortest turnaround between title fights ever is? I can't think of an efficient way to look that up myself.
Just to be clear, I mean the shortest time ever between a fighter defending(or winning) his title and then defending it again.
title - division - date of defense - boxer-ID - days between bouts
Code: Select all
shortest title defense started Thu May 22 12:04:50 2014
AU Heavyweight 1886-04-20 39896 1
AU Middleweight 1906-10-15 39855 9
AU Welterweight 1915-05-17 52150 5
AU Light Welterweight 1980-07-18 19507 14
AU Lightweight 1910-02-02 52150 4
AU Featherweight 1936-11-13 46082 2
AU Bantamweight 1904-06-13 136086 2
AU Flyweight 1938-04-14 158423 16
AUNSW Welterweight 1932-05-16 87429 14
AUNSW Featherweight 1935-07-13 71674 18
AUQLD Welterweight 1930-11-28 129748 4
AUQLD Lightweight 1917-06-23 88851 14
AUQLD Featherweight 1940-06-12 147687 12
AUSA Heavyweight 1912-12-26 40048 10
AUSA Welterweight 1910-10-12 145306 16
AUWA Heavyweight 1938-10-14 180693 7
AUWA Middleweight 1958-07-21 132019 7
AUWA Welterweight 1924-12-27 86896 14
AUWA Lightweight 1926-11-19 159216 14
BE Middleweight 1941-11-11 10215 13
BE Lightweight 1927-01-14 197412 6
BE Bantamweight 1941-07-22 50881 1
BO Heavyweight 2013-03-26 450595 19
BR Heavyweight 2006-08-20 14163 7
BR Cruiserweight 2010-09-05 536325 10
BR Middleweight 1929-11-09 374369 14
BR Light Middleweight 2008-08-05 463494 11
BR Welterweight 1939-01-19 626762 13
BR Super Flyweight 2010-06-08 477137 11
CA Light Heavyweight 1924-07-30 11345 16
CA Lightweight 1914-07-11 55948 10
CA Featherweight 1926-10-28 41523 8
CA Bantamweight 1922-09-20 51461 14
CISBB Light Heavyweight 2002-06-29 13291 16
CO Super Bantamweight 1987-04-03 153251 16
COMM Middleweight 1973-08-20 11414 17
COMM Light Welterweight 1976-12-16 154 13
CU Welterweight 1934-06-10 89504 8
CU Featherweight 1934-08-04 79468 14
DE Middleweight 1951-08-11 9700 20
DE Welterweight 1956-02-04 48744 15
DE Featherweight 1935-09-06 41269 14
DE Bantamweight 1950-05-28 105746 8
EBU Middleweight 1926-03-31 17902 12
EBU Welterweight 1929-06-02 41210 18
EBU Super Featherweight 1981-02-14 24660 14
EBU Flyweight 1950-11-18 16284 19
ES Light Heavyweight 1946-10-12 112717 14
ES Middleweight 1942-04-26 126187 14
ES Light Middleweight 1976-09-07 30326 10
ES Welterweight 1968-04-05 46980 13
ES Light Welterweight 1975-09-20 95072 16
ES Lightweight 1972-09-29 15997 20
ES Super Featherweight 1994-05-20 38540 14
ES Bantamweight 1964-11-14 12623 14
FECAR Super Featherweight 2008-05-16 122636 20
FR Heavyweight 1933-11-13 12095 17
FR Middleweight 1942-11-11 10238 11
FR Welterweight 1936-03-05 67037 19
FR Lightweight 1959-03-23 12661 16
FR Featherweight 1927-12-20 9873 10
FR Bantamweight 1945-04-22 71 15
FR Flyweight 1938-05-16 51567 17
IBFPPY Super Featherweight 2008-09-10 387333 19
IBUOLD Middleweight 1935-07-13 17887 15
IN Light Welterweight 1994-06-16 15202 12
IN Minimumweight 1989-04-02 4559 10
IT Middleweight 1915-02-23 148898 17
JP Lightweight 1953-08-29 29394 19
KR Super Bantamweight 1972-03-10 11140 12
MX Heavyweight 1923-05-19 11023 3
MX Welterweight 1940-09-10 24513 6
MX Lightweight 1924-10-25 325645 7
MX Flyweight 1940-08-03 45 17
NABF Light Welterweight 1987-02-24 1265 15
NABF Lightweight 1975-02-15 193 9
NABF Super Featherweight 1991-08-17 1371 17
NBA Light Welterweight 1931-01-30 10121 7
NBA Featherweight 1936-03-02 9931 13
NBA Flyweight 1931-07-30 39120 14
NL Lightweight 1942-01-26 33619 14
NYSAC Light Heavyweight 1933-03-24 11349 14
NYSAC Flyweight 1928-08-03 27850 14
NZ1905 Middleweight 1886-09-06 143658 13
NZ1905 Lightweight 1888-07-01 10704 8
NZBA Welterweight 1938-04-28 143673 8
NZBA Lightweight 1913-08-23 144377 11
PA Featherweight 1925-05-16 59173 14
PABA Light Heavyweight 2008-04-22 427368 12
PH00 Bantamweight 2008-02-13 84810 12
PH00 Light Flyweight 2002-12-16 6122 16
SOAM Cruiserweight 2011-04-09 536325 14
SOAM Lightweight 1996-11-08 3425 13
TH Featherweight 1995-12-22 6289 8
TH Light Flyweight 1977-03-15 51395 19
UK Light Middleweight 1997-03-14 7495 17
UK Bantamweight 1902-05-13 88221 1
USAZ Middleweight 1931-07-13 17914 12
USCA Heavyweight 1967-03-28 11977 14
USCA Middleweight 1941-07-18 12423 10
USCA Bantamweight 1932-02-12 41264 15
USCT Lightweight 1916-12-15 265427 18
USFL Middleweight 1950-10-09 11809 13
USME Light Heavyweight 1941-01-17 35702 14
USME Middleweight 1953-04-27 145732 14
USME Welterweight 1946-01-14 34815 10
USME Lightweight 1944-10-06 12820 7
USME Featherweight 1926-04-30 68137 17
USMI Lightweight 1945-09-28 67624 14
USMN Heavyweight 1961-04-26 10850 20
USMN Middleweight 1947-12-16 127614 12
USMN Featherweight 1941-02-07 30146 7
USNEW Light Heavyweight 1971-09-16 296 6
USNEW Middleweight 1944-10-06 11787 14
USNEW Welterweight 1928-09-13 48201 13
USNEW Lightweight 1939-11-27 9462 17
USNEW Featherweight 1970-11-12 12687 14
USNH Heavyweight 1930-07-10 174471 14
USOR Lightweight 1935-07-26 141218 13
USPA Lightweight 1940-01-26 29600 11
USTX Heavyweight 1940-06-21 39866 14
USTX Bantamweight 1955-11-10 70129 14
USUT Lightweight 1939-03-13 319228 14
USWA Heavyweight 1934-04-05 34997 14
USWA Welterweight 1935-04-04 21661 16
VE Featherweight 1930-09-21 42081 14
VE Flyweight 1979-07-07 65003 14
WBCABC Light Heavyweight 2008-04-22 427368 12
WBCINT Super Bantamweight 2010-09-10 306992 13
WBCMUN Featherweight 2001-05-05 46101 1
WBCUSNBC Super Middleweight 2012-02-18 453333 15
WBCY Light Welterweight 2008-05-06 96488 19
WBCY Super Featherweight 2003-09-02 102505 3
WBO Minimumweight 1994-01-07 4171 16
WBOAPY Super Featherweight 2008-09-10 387333 19
WBOEUR Lightweight 2013-10-07 464966 17
WBOINT Featherweight 1995-07-17 8851 17
WBOLAT Flyweight 1997-09-20 8901 14
WS Heavyweight 2004-06-24 38985 12
ZA Lightweight 1946-02-20 52335 18
ZA Super Bantamweight 2009-06-12 360327 19
ZA Bantamweight 1956-05-28 30254 17
ZA Flyweight 1909-11-29 305917 17
ZABLK Middleweight 1955-08-22 110962 14
ZABLK Lightweight 1955-08-22 110878 14
ZABLK Bantamweight 1957-03-30 87843 15
ZATRBLK Featherweight 1964-09-25 76435 20
shortes title defense finished Thu May 22 12:04:53 2014
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Thank you very much good Sir, appreciate it 