Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

terrdilk wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:
maley1984 wrote:Beating dilks won't benefit or progress keanes career so it wud b a pointless fight imo. Keane is looking at the top names at cruiser and dilks is a blown up super middle so if keane stops him that all people will say. from wat I hear not many prepared to take the fight with keane which surprises me as he has shown he can b vulnerable although he does hav power himself. He must b frustrated at being over looked.
X2 :TU: spot on mate
And yes it's very frustrating, nearly 5 years now of broken promises, let downs & avoiding, then when we get our 1st and only chance it came at wrong time but we had to go for it only 20% ready and paid the price, but hopefully we will get a chance again soon! we keep winning we can't be avoided for ever! surely ?
That's your opinion an cool fare one I just thought u was a touch disrespectful calling me a fat super middle how do u now how I have been performing with the extra weight. At the end of the day if no one will fight your lad I'm game Steve is my manager if your struggling for an opponent I'm game see how the fat super middle copes at cruiser
That's fair enough mate, I wasn't meaning to sound disrespectful and apologise if that's how it came across, that wasn't my intention pal, it's just frustrating has you can understand but either way I should of worded it a bit better.

Yh if Steve can get something worth while put on the line then yh no worries the fight can happen mate.
Last edited by Boxingcutsman on 28 Mar 2014, 16:37, edited 1 time in total.
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

Anzi wrote:Boxing Cutsman you are the only clown on here, go and wobble back into McDonalds, before you have a heart attack, it was a bit of harmless fun, but you don't have a sense of humour.

I'm that much of a clown, if you know me, private inbox me and I'll gladly meet you at McDonald's and bite the face off ya, you mug. But then if u do know me then you won't do it will ya cuz u know what I'm about u fuking tool. THE CHALLENGE IS DOWN, WHAT NOW ? cun t
terrdilk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 09:56

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by terrdilk »

[quote="Boxingcutsman"] cool mate an thank you for apology I'm plesently plump not fat hahahahah :TU:
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

terrdilk wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote: cool mate an thank you for apology I'm plesently plump not fat hahahahah :TU:
Haha me too mate so I can't speak :lol:

Yh no worries, I am sincere about apology though, it wasn't meant how it come across.

Great knockout of drake that night wasn't it, really worrying for a while in there tbh, luckily he was ok, I can still remember it vivid, nice little short right hand has he come into you
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22936
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by mickey1975 »

Carl, I'm apologising if I caused you grief on this forum bringing up old rubbish. Never met you and there is two sides to every story. No excuse, but I was drunk when I wrote it. Would have said it earlier but haven't seen you on here for a bit.
mahatma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 16:22

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by mahatma »

aside the arguments on here -id like to ask Carl what happened with the fight with Conquest and why are you not contesting the Commonwealth title?
terrdilk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 09:56

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by terrdilk »

mickey1975 wrote:Carl, I'm apologising if I caused you grief on this forum bringing up old rubbish. Never met you and there is two sides to every story. No excuse, but I was drunk when I wrote it. Would have said it earlier but haven't seen you on here for a bit.
No problem mate better late than never :TU:
terrdilk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 13 Jan 2009, 09:56

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by terrdilk »

mahatma wrote:aside the arguments on here -id like to ask Carl what happened with the fight with Conquest and why are you not contesting the Commonwealth title?
Basically they said I have not really beat anyone at the weight of note which I understand so it is wot it is I'll just have to make my way up rankings I suppose
mahatma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 262
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 16:22

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by mahatma »

Thanks for your honest response Carl hope you get a shot soon remember you having a close one with Adamu for the Commonwealth title at s/middle good luck with your career - I think McKenzie will win Conquest is the better boxer but I think Ovil has great power and that will tell.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

Boxingcutsman wrote:
Anzi wrote:Boxing Cutsman you are the only clown on here, go and wobble back into McDonalds, before you have a heart attack, it was a bit of harmless fun, but you don't have a sense of humour.

I'm that much of a clown, if you know me, private inbox me and I'll gladly meet you at McDonald's and bite the face off ya, you mug. But then if u do know me then you won't do it will ya cuz u know what I'm about u fuking tool. THE CHALLENGE IS DOWN, WHAT NOW ? cun t
ha ha, yes I do know you, you fornicating twat, you might try to eat me lol, no doubt you eat everything else, don't get threatening people,it might come back to bite you,pardon the pun.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

If you know me, but if you know me lol
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

Anzi wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:
Anzi wrote:Boxing Cutsman you are the only clown on here, go and wobble back into McDonalds, before you have a heart attack, it was a bit of harmless fun, but you don't have a sense of humour.

I'm that much of a clown, if you know me, private inbox me and I'll gladly meet you at McDonald's and bite the face off ya, you mug. But then if u do know me then you won't do it will ya cuz u know what I'm about u fuking tool. THE CHALLENGE IS DOWN, WHAT NOW ? cun t
ha ha, yes I do know you, you effing twat, you might try to eat me lol, no doubt you eat everything else, don't get threatening people,it might come back to bite you,pardon the pun.

Listen, i dont make threats, i just act, u reckon u know me, so inbox me, tell me who u are or better still phone me cuz clearly I don't hide behind aliases, or computer screens, everyone knows who I am, no bullshit mate I ain't bothered if you do know me, your not capable of troubling me, that's a fact, so ring me instead of giving it the Barry big balls on the Internet, or if you ain't stop being a waste of spun k like your being and trying to impress with ya childish bullshit overweight jibes, cuz guaranteed u ain't no Adonis yourself :TU:
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2080
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by jonp »

Birmingham show down The small heath slasher vs The middle aged Mauler. Youth meets experiance .Beauty meets the beast lol

Me and tom will put it on the next show.
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

jonp wrote:Birmingham show down The small heath slasher vs The middle aged Mauler. Youth meets experiance .Beauty meets the beast lol

Me and tom will put it on the next show.

Hahaha plz at least say I'm the beauty in that statement Jon :lol:
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2080
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by jonp »

No homo from me but your defo the youth
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

jonp wrote:No homo from me but your defo the youth

Hahaha hahaha
Michael bennt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Michael bennt »

terrdilk wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:What a joke this is. First we've (team Keane) been trying for this fight (along with others in top 5) long before Conquest won the commonwealth, then we've been trying every week to make the fight since he won it, bearing in mind Chris is also promoted by the same promoters,

the first reply was
" no chance will we be putting Tony in with Chris"

then the next reply was
" ok, u can have the fight, but you've got to put it on your own show & Tony wants at least £ xx, 000 " knowing we haven't got TV deal or £ xx, 000 it will cost all in all just to put the one fight on.

:oo wtf ? But they then go and somehow get the C/W council to pass a fight between Conquest & a fat S/M who has only had 1 fight against a sausage at Cruiser, then that falls through & now they've ignored us again and chose a old, light-heavy instead who again shouldn't be given the shot seen has he got stopped at light-heavy in his last fight and lost 3 out of his last 6 (2 by Ko) at that lower weight.

We've lost a fight, we're not unbeatable, what's up with us ? All we're asking for is a chance and non of these fighters/promoters/managers/teams will except a fight with us, are we really that dangerous ? IMO I don't think so, can you all really call your lads/yourselves fighters ? Imo NO.

Boxing is becoming a joke, with the big promoters hyping up, bullshitting & hood winking the paying public into buying into these fights, where we know who the winner will be anyway, and keeping it all hush hush and the board & councils allowing it so they can keep the titles in house like pass the parcel.

I think fans would start to look at a lot of people involved in this sport and the sport itself in a different light if they knew what really went on, most of the time it's not the fighters, most will fight anyone, but the bullshitters & snakes in the ties on the other hand leave a lot to be desired.

At least the WWE wrestling keeps the fans guessing to see who's been told to win on the night at there shows.
This fat super middle has got no problem fighting your man keane get on to Steve woods an lets get sort it out
Carl what about a all Liverpool derby vs big ticket seller Louis cuddy? That's fight that would do good business in Liverpool and would good clash of styles
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by chiggsy »

Michael bennt wrote:
terrdilk wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:What a joke this is. First we've (team Keane) been trying for this fight (along with others in top 5) long before Conquest won the commonwealth, then we've been trying every week to make the fight since he won it, bearing in mind Chris is also promoted by the same promoters,

the first reply was
" no chance will we be putting Tony in with Chris"

then the next reply was
" ok, u can have the fight, but you've got to put it on your own show & Tony wants at least £ xx, 000 " knowing we haven't got TV deal or £ xx, 000 it will cost all in all just to put the one fight on.

:oo wtf ? But they then go and somehow get the C/W council to pass a fight between Conquest & a fat S/M who has only had 1 fight against a sausage at Cruiser, then that falls through & now they've ignored us again and chose a old, light-heavy instead who again shouldn't be given the shot seen has he got stopped at light-heavy in his last fight and lost 3 out of his last 6 (2 by Ko) at that lower weight.

We've lost a fight, we're not unbeatable, what's up with us ? All we're asking for is a chance and non of these fighters/promoters/managers/teams will except a fight with us, are we really that dangerous ? IMO I don't think so, can you all really call your lads/yourselves fighters ? Imo NO.

Boxing is becoming a joke, with the big promoters hyping up, bullshitting & hood winking the paying public into buying into these fights, where we know who the winner will be anyway, and keeping it all hush hush and the board & councils allowing it so they can keep the titles in house like pass the parcel.

I think fans would start to look at a lot of people involved in this sport and the sport itself in a different light if they knew what really went on, most of the time it's not the fighters, most will fight anyone, but the bullshitters & snakes in the ties on the other hand leave a lot to be desired.

At least the WWE wrestling keeps the fans guessing to see who's been told to win on the night at there shows.
This fat super middle has got no problem fighting your man keane get on to Steve woods an lets get sort it out
Carl what about a all Liverpool derby vs big ticket seller Louis cuddy? That's fight that would do good business in Liverpool and would good clash of styles
Anyone know why cuddy turned pro so late?

I know he's got a bit of a ''colourful'' past but he's not alone there in this sport.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

[quote=onp"]Birmiyoum show down The small heath slasher vs The middle aged Mauler. Youth meets experiance .Beauty meets the beast lol

Me and tom will put inow, the next show.[/quote. You would have to make sure you have the paramedics accompany him to the ring, in case hel blow's out on the way to the ring,might have a cardiac arrest lol, but I am up for it, can you arrange a match of 1/2 min round, because that's all he will last before he needs he needs some air,let's do it for charity or we could do it in the cage, which would be more in my areawe can do it at catch weight, legally, no one gets locked up that way,Image not fought for quite a while, so it will be great to have a purpose to train,get a big crowd and help a charity, plus it will be nice.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

Boxingcutsman, I am not the one trying to Mr big balls, you are, I am just having a bit of fun, I don't take you serious at all.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

You was quick to apologise after you insulted a boxer,when he came on here though, bully comes to mind.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by bripez »

Boxingcutsman wrote:
Yh if Steve can get something worth while put on the line then yh no worries the fight can happen mate.
What is that supposed to mean? - sounds like back tracking to me.

"Something worthwhile" -like what, a title or big money ? - the fight would hardly be Mayweather v Pac (no disrespect to the boxers).

You have also changed your tune, from being very disrespectful to boxers to suddenly changing and coming over all apologetic when a boxer agrees to fight your (I assume) boxer.

Dilks would represent an improvement in the level of opposition for Keane and I don't see why you would reject this fight?
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

bripez wrote:
Boxingcutsman wrote:
Yh if Steve can get something worth while put on the line then yh no worries the fight can happen mate.
What is that supposed to mean? - sounds like back tracking to me.

"Something worthwhile" -like what, a title or big money ? - the fight would hardly be Mayweather v Pac (no disrespect to the boxers).

You have also changed your tune, from being very disrespectful to boxers to suddenly changing and coming over all apologetic when a boxer agrees to fight your (I assume) boxer.

Dilks would represent an improvement in the level of opposition for Keane and I don't see why you would reject this fight?
Not at all, I apologised for calling him a fat S/M, and how I worded it, I should have put a blown up S/M which would of been better, so no ones changed there tune at all, it did sound out of order the way I wrote it and I'm a big man and not afraid to apologise if I'm in the wrong.

Worth while means some sort of title, yes. We are ranked in top 10 in our division, where is Carl ranked ? We are a area champion in our weight class, Carl isnt ?
He's new to the weight division, So how is he a improvement on who Keane has boxed ? 4 lads with unbeaten records, 3 of which big punchers, 1 unbeaten, including a former recent British Champion & probably the current British champ after tonight's fight. We beat Carl and get no credit for it cuz everyone says, well he's only a S/M anyway, so unless it's for a title for us it's a no win fight IMO
It's like us moving up to heavyweight & wanting a fight with Anthony Joshua, (only a example) they ain't gonna risk it with us unless there's something worth while at stake has we bring nothing to the table except risk, it's business, it's how it works in this sport, and we haven't rejected Carls offer of a fight at all, in fact it was discussed this morning and it's a high possibility that we can make that fight soon.
Hopefully that clears up your questions & YOUR sounds of backtracking :TU:
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Boxingcutsman »

Anzi wrote:Boxingcutsman, I am not the one trying to Mr big balls, you are, I am just having a bit of fun, I don't take you serious at all.

well well well, Mr. Naji Al Harbi :doh: did you really think I wouldn't find out who you was ?
Your hated, people couldn't wait to turn you in.

I've tried ringing you but it's ringing out constantly, it's like you don't want to talk ?

The most unliked person in boxing in our area hiding behind a alias, again :shame:

I'm actually in hysterics more than angry, that you actually wrote the stuff you wrote.
I defended you to a lot of people when I was working with you, everyone was slagging you off, saying why am I having anything to do with you, I actually fought your corner and defended you & Nasser many many times, then you have the cheek to come on here and try having a dig at one of my fighters ( say it to Chris face ) then try and get personal with me, you complete fornicating joke, I've forgot more about this sport than you'll ever know, oh yh that's right, you come from a Kung fu background :roll: And has for fighting you, mate your a 5ft tall, 3ft round little fat, old midget, so you haven't got no place to be calling me names now, have you ?
You know where I live Naji, come round mate, I'll have a nice cup of tea with plenty of sugar in waiting for ya :TU:
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Tony Conquest vs Carl Dilks

Post by Anzi »

Boxingcutsman wrote:
Anzi wrote:Boxingcutsman, I am not the one trying to Mr big balls, you are, I am just having a bit of fun, I don't take you serious at all.

well well well, Mr. Naji Al Harbi :doh: did you really think I wouldn't find out who you was ?
Your hated, people couldn't wait to turn you in.

I've tried ringing you but it's ringing out constantly, it's like you don't want to talk ?

The most unliked person in boxing in our area hiding behind a alias, again :shame:

I'm actually in hysterics more than angry, that you actually wrote the stuff you wrote.
I defended you to a lot of people when I was working with you, everyone was slagging you off, saying why am I having anything to do with you, I actually fought your corner and defended you & Nasser many many times, then you have the cheek to come on here and try having a dig at one of my fighters ( say it to Chris face ) then try and get personal with me, you complete effing joke, I've forgot more about this sport than you'll ever know, oh yh that's right, you come from a Kung fu background :roll: And has for fighting you, mate your a 5ft tall, 3ft round little fat, old midget, so you haven't got no place to be calling me names now, have you ?
You know where I live Naji, come round mate, I'll have a nice cup of tea with plenty of sugar in waiting for ya :TU:
All you have done is look at my previous posts, about people turning me in ? Don't make me laugh, you must be the only one on here, who don't know and I have had some of your haters ringing me about your posts, don't be naive, everyone has haters in this business, most people are two faced, you show me one post where I have had a dig at Chris Keane ? You can't, in fact I complimented him on here, the part you got upset about was me just having a bit of fun, saying lets get it on, kind of thing, you are fickle, I even took a fighter to spar Chris in Coventry, but for you to threaten someone you don't know with biting their face off shows immaturity and stupidity, good job it was only a 5ft 1inch fat midget, actually I am 5ft 7inch according to my medical and I would rather be called stocky lol, I have had a kung fu back ground, as well JuJitsu, Karate, Akido, Judo and MMA, I fought for many years, when did you, apart from on the doors ? as for you forgetting more then I know about boxing ? I started about 20 years before you, so that would take some doing, I also have contacts around the world, as well as in the Uk, do you ? In fact I was going to offer Chris a place on a show I am putting together with my contacts in Dubai. have you ever trained anyone, I thought Paul did the training ? You tried to call me but it kept ringing ? Well I have not had any missed calls and plenty of people call me all the time in the industry, including Jon Pegg and my number is with the board and I will call Paul, Chris Keane's trainer in Coventry and show him all the posts I have wrote on his fighter, let him be the judge, I am confident I have been fair on that.
Post Reply