Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical abilityShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Brad would stop limond brad can go as far as he wants up to himbilly nelson wrote:Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical abilityShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
I thought he win British and eurotear up wrote:Brad would stop limond brad can go as far as he wants up to himbilly nelson wrote:Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical abilityShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
I think questions will get answered when someone with a bit of power hits Bradley back.. He reminds me a bit of Bigger Alex Arthur. Huge for the weight and likes to bully opponents.. I can see Willie giving him some questions but would expect a stoppage in the first half of the fight.. I hope Woodhouse is not fed to him.. Bradley is all wrong for Curtis hope he can avoid that one
-
curtis wood
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 935
- Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Brad looks a real good fighter, got all the moves and seems to bang hard, I won't be fed to anybody, I'm not that daft, but everybody has a price
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Curtis very honest if you, money does talk though and FW will want that title in his camp , but I believe that Dave has Eddie working behind him for you as your as tough as they come and your story sells, I believe Dave will not want that fight unless you have no other option. Tommy Coyle is a major money maker, Darren Hamilton rematch and anyone who's name
Is not Bradley Saunders is the route i would go down :p
Is not Bradley Saunders is the route i would go down :p
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis matemickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Curtis didn't at Hamilton and Ward definitely didn't at Hall. It's great business in Hull and will happen.tear up wrote:Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis matemickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Bradley's got to much for Tommy IMO good fight all the samemickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Knew you was going to put that hamickey1975 wrote:Curtis didn't at Hamilton and Ward definitely didn't at Hall. It's great business in Hull and will happen.tear up wrote:Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis matemickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
I agree. I mean Curtis and tommy makes sense.billy nelson wrote:Bradley's got to much for Tommy IMO good fight all the samemickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
I know Willie and Curtis well and i can assure you no way would eithier duck a fight there true fighting menBlack Sam Bellamy wrote:Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
I know Willie and Curtis well and i can assure you no way would eithier duck a fight there true fighting menBlack Sam Bellamy wrote:Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
THEBUTCH wrote:Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
There are plenty that like to dish it out, we'll have to see how much he enjoys it when he's getting some back.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Maybe a little too much he hit prince twice after going down.THEBUTCH wrote:Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.