Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post Reply
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5199
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

I've always been under the impression that the olympic gold medalist is entitled to challenge for a world title in his first fight if he wants it. Obviously the vast majority of olympic champs don't go for it. Is this correct though? If an olympic champ decided to fight for the heavyweight title and campaigned to the governing bodies, would they insert him as mandatory challenger without a pro fight?
boxingcoach1
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 18:19

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by boxingcoach1 »

i wouldn't imagine so lomachenko had one in his 2nd but his previous wsb fights count as pro bouts to american governing bodys maybe wrong but thats my take on things
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5199
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Olympic champ Teofilo Stevenson from Cuba was offered a fight with Ali after he won the olympics. As he was Cuban, he stayed amateur.

Pete Rademacher won the olympic title and enforced an immediate title shot against Floyd Patterson. He put up a good effort but lost.

It seems like in the heavyweight division at least, there is a history of Olympic champs being lined up for title fights in their first fight, if they want it.
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by Anzi »

Not in Britain though, the board would need to see rounds in first, 4, 6, 8, 10 rounders first usually, America anything goes, it's about marketing and money.
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by Emmseegee »

There are obviously exceptions who could hold their own but the majority would take a pounding in such a step up.
I know Khan was a silver medalist, but imagine he had won and was thrown in the deepend against who ever the world champion was at the time. His career would have been ended in the first fight.
Joshua against a Klitschko?

I agree the ams with really good pedigree should be moved faster but thats a step too far for me.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Emmseegee wrote:There are obviously exceptions who could hold their own but the majority would take a pounding in such a step up.
I know Khan was a silver medalist, but imagine he had won and was thrown in the deepend against who ever the world champion was at the time. His career would have been ended in the first fight.
Joshua against a Klitschko?

I agree the ams with really good pedigree should be moved faster but thats a step too far for me.
If we go with Khan and suggest he was a Lightweight when he debuted, a world title fight would have seem him facing:
Juan Diaz (WBA)
Diego Corrales (WBO and WBC)
Leavander Johnson (IBF)

Interesting to think about but yeah, can't see him having beaten any of them (Johnson won the vacant title about a month before Khan's debut)
gp.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1034
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 22:18

Re: Olympic Champion has a right to an immediate title shot?

Post by gp. »

Quite simply, no. It's not correct, never has been correct, and I have no idea where you got that from.
Post Reply