'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Those lists have all sorts of problems.
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Greg Page was a very, underrated hitter.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
John Ruiz.
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Too bad we can't ask Ingo and 'Enery about Patterson's punching power.
You think Tunney would have made as big an impression on them?
You think Tunney would have made as big an impression on them?
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Clay's power getting a little underrated here
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
What a load of crap.
-
Heartbreak_Kid79
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 418
- Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 13:39
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
I'm amazed that Foreman isn't touted as 'the hardest hitter' in the pre 1982 list
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Willard and Fitzsimmons didn't ought to be the list; Mike Weaver and BoneCrusher Smith surely hit harder.
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
I'm not sold on Dempsey hitting harder than Foreman at all; there was talk of loaded gloves for the Willard bout. If Foreman had used loaded gloves he'd have killed someone outright.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Harder than Mike Tyson or Lennox Lewis?BarryWashington wrote:Of the post '78 bunchBarryWashington wrote:Punch for punch, Bruno probably hit the hardest
I'd have to disagree with that: Frank Bruno never even floored a world class opponent, let alone knocked one out.
All truly great punchers have a some world class scalps on their resumes.
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Walcott at number 15 out of 31 champions? He was more than a median hitter, he hit terrible with either hand.
(I appreciate it is difficult making lists like this).
(I appreciate it is difficult making lists like this).
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Cheers for replying; the bare statistics do not make a concrete argument always. Walcott dropped and hurt many excellent fighters; the hook that he flattened Charles with was brutal; knocking out or stopping 2 thirds of the men he faced is some going; he boxed some good men.Il Duce wrote:Look at Jersey Joe Walcott a little closer.palooka wrote:Walcott at number 15 out of 31 champions? He was more than a median hitter, he hit terrible with either hand.
(I appreciate it is difficult making lists like this).
From the start of his career thru August 1946 {Age; 32 years, 7 months}
He was 41-9-2 {27 KO's}, that was a 66% KO-Rate.
-
Vladimir5555
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1221
- Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Chris Byrd
-
bodyblow999
- Middleweight
- Posts: 19
- Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 02:15
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Tommy Burns? He was a big puncher. Only one guy went the distance with him as champ until Johnson.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15178
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: 'Weakest Hitting' Heavyweight Champions
Actually, the 1982 to now list is not bad. The first list obviously total BS.