Boxing News Coincidence?

Post Reply
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Boxing News Coincidence?

Post by steve689 »

Boxing News December 2nd 2005....either someone has been doing their homework or we have alerted BN to this national major event:

What A Joke

How's this for alphabet soup: Seven-fight Russian Welterweight Zapir Gereev won the vacant WBE European Youth Title, the vacant EBF European Youth Title and the vacant GBC Intercontinental Title in Berlin last Friday (November 25). He beat Germany's poor Mehmet Karaka, 2-3 (1), in one round.


Back off Boxing News we heralded the news first :evil: :evil: http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31681

:lol: :TU:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Biggest coincidence was the story about internet boxing poster "Real Deal" offering DVD's in a competition to guess Danny's weight.
kevin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by kevin »

Nice to see they don't just 'nick' BBN news :TU:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

I want royalties for starting the thread :lol: Seriously though i'm no Boxing journalist but they couldn't surely have been researching into this otherwise...could they?!
chado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 325
Joined: 30 May 2003, 11:39

Post by chado »

Even if it was read on here, surely that is research :-?
kevin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by kevin »

Yes but a source would good from time to time!!
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

I'm just glad this bout is getting the wider recognition it so clearly deserves..... :lol:

Seriously, though, surely the likes of B.N. and Boxing Monthly detail people to watch the websites? It saves them doing the research, and no way can a weekly publication match the speed that internet sites like BBN get interviews and stories up. And whilst we may not conduct interviews in the same way on forums like this, you know the news breaks here first. Well, quicker than we can read it elsewhere, if you know what I mean.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

chado wrote:Even if it was read on here, surely that is research :-?
Your dead right Chado :TU:
chado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 325
Joined: 30 May 2003, 11:39

Post by chado »

Kevin wrote:Yes but a source would good from time to time!!
Completley agree
dandantheweatherman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 337
Joined: 23 Apr 2004, 20:10

Post by dandantheweatherman »

Next time BN trawl this topic, maybe they could suggest 3 reasons why I should renew my subscription that I'm yet to be convinced to renew.....
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Just stick with us Dan and you will be okay mate :TU:
DK2112
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 264
Joined: 17 Jul 2004, 18:51

Post by DK2112 »

dandantheweatherman wrote:Next time BN trawl this topic, maybe they could suggest 3 reasons why I should renew my subscription that I'm yet to be convinced to renew.....
I always think this but I'd be lost without boxing news every friday I think so I end up getting another year's worth.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

chado wrote:
Kevin wrote:Yes but a source would good from time to time!!
Completley agree
I agree to. I love Boxing News but if they do get gossip, information etc off a website they should mention the websites name.
dandantheweatherman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 337
Joined: 23 Apr 2004, 20:10

Post by dandantheweatherman »

I think it's bang out of order for a publication not to quote it's source, not only out of common courtesy, but also from BN's point of view, suppose they took something of the 'net that turned out to be totally untrue and got done for libel. Wouldn't quoting the source up front not help them in this sort of situation.

Anyway, what annoys me most about BN is it's capacity to turn up on a Saturday or a Monday rather than a Friday, although I accept this isn't BN's fault!
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

Boxing News have quoted http://www.fightnews.com a few times as their source.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Post by dondada »

Neri1983 wrote:Boxing News have quoted http://www.fightnews.com a few times as their source.
Oh yes. They regularly source loads of American sites. twobobbit.com get lineage. Seconds Out - who BN have just agreed to advertise on - also get name checked.

Kevin and I both subscribe to BN and Kev paid money to advertise BritishBoxing.net in the magazine. Did they advertise with us though? No. And if they've used a tiny bit here and there from us, we don't get name checked.

I suppose we must be doing something right, eh?
Owain
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 21:27

Post by Owain »

DK2112 wrote:
dandantheweatherman wrote:Next time BN trawl this topic, maybe they could suggest 3 reasons why I should renew my subscription that I'm yet to be convinced to renew.....
I always think this but I'd be lost without boxing news every friday I think so I end up getting another year's worth.
I used to think that I'd miss BN if I stopped subscribing but when the late deliveries reached ridiculous levels I stopped subscribing, must be over a year ago now. Don't miss it at all; get all the news I could want from websites and this forum.

Save yourself some money would be my advice.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Post by Deserter »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Neri1983 wrote:Boxing News have quoted http://www.fightnews.com a few times as their source.
Oh yes. They regularly source loads of American sites. twobobbit.com get lineage. Seconds Out - who BN have just agreed to advertise on - also get name checked.

Kevin and I both subscribe to BN and Kev paid money to advertise BritishBoxing.net in the magazine. Did they advertise with us though? No. And if they've used a tiny bit here and there from us, we don't get name checked.

I suppose we must be doing something right, eh?
My guess is that they're already concerned about losing readers to British-based sites and that highlighting those same sites in their publication will hasten the flight of some. Doesn't excuse the omissions but does explain them.
Post Reply