Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
You have Eddie Hearn and sky sports ramming it down are throat with all this the special one shit but fact of the matter is he is a European level fighter at best and deep down brooks know it as well, he got offered a fight for the ibf title against k9 bundredge and turned it down he then turned a fight back against Bradley and he also didn't want none of Devon Alexander, I just don't see a world level fighter, plus I have heard of boxing people I highly respect that he doesn't live the life he is a party animal and has gone up in weight as high as 14 stone, other top welterweight like , mayweather, Thurman, Madina ,Bradley, Marquez, pacquiao would all knock him out and hurt him and I would also pick the underrated Shawn porter and Robert Guerrero to out point him the so called special one
Last edited by Michael bennt on 05 Apr 2014, 15:30, edited 1 time in total.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
I think your spot on I'd favour all the names you've mentioned and Amir Khan to beat KellMichael bennt wrote:You have Eddie Hearn and sky sports ramming it down are throat with all this the special one poo but fact of the matter is he is a European level fighter at best and deep down brooks know it as well, he got offered a fight for the ibf title against k9 bundredge and turned it down he then turned a fight back against Bradley and he also didn't want none of Devon Alexander, I just don't see a world level fighter, plus I have heard of boxing people I highly respect that he doesn't live the life he is a party animal and has gone up in weight as high as 14 stone, other top welterweight like , mayweather, Thurman, Madina ,Bradley, Marquez, pacquiao would all knock him out and hurt him and I would also pick the underrated Shawn porter and Robert Guerrero to out point him the so called special one
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
Get a life my friend you know nothing about Kell.
By the way he doesn't operate a lever you nob.
By the way he doesn't operate a lever you nob.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
I think that you're getting easier to troll Parson
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
Billy - as a boxing man why do agree with a post that has little fact in it ?
Would you accuse Alexander of not wanting a piece of brook when HE pulled out injured ?
WTF is this K9 nonsense ?!?
Would you accuse Alexander of not wanting a piece of brook when HE pulled out injured ?
WTF is this K9 nonsense ?!?
Last edited by Parson Cross on 05 Apr 2014, 15:31, edited 1 time in total.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Palooka
When someone like Billy agrees with a tosser that's not funny.
When someone like Billy agrees with a tosser that's not funny.
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
The k9 business is brook was offerd a shot at the title but he and his dad both turned it downParson Cross wrote:Billy - as a boxing man why do agree with a post that has little fact in it ?
Would you accuse Akexandwr of not wanting a piece of Zbrooklands when HE pulled out injured ?
WTF is this K9 nonsense ?!?
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
Like most people I have been waiting for the last 3 years for Brook to step up and prove hes world class. Instead all I have seen are an endless stream of eliminators, final eliminators and "keep busy fights" all against sub par/poor opposition.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Billy knows a lot of things but isn't right about everything, Michael Bennt isn't right about a lot of things but knows somethings. I imagine he's put the thread on for a flare up though and there'll be more heat than light generated.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Don't agree with billy often but does anyone actually think Brook would beat mayweather, Thurman, Madina ,Bradley, Marquez, or pacquiao?? No chance. Carson Jones gave him hell. These guys are proven levels above.
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
And throw in Porter, Guerrero and broner who all beat brookrio wrote:Don't agree with billy often but does anyone actually think Brook would beat mayweather, Thurman, Madina ,Bradley, Marquez, or pacquiao?? No chance. Carson Jones gave him hell. These guys are proven levels above.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Absolute total utter and complete bullshit about K9.
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
No it's not brook said him self that he knocked the fight bk while he was under allegedly cause him and his team didn't want to leave the welterweight division so no it's not utter balls shitParson Cross wrote:Absolute total utter and complete bullshit about K9.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Heard the same thing. However you cannot be to harsh on him turning that fight down as he would have had to move up to light middle. Turning down Bradley is another story tho, cannot defend that move.Michael bennt wrote:No it's not brook said him self that he knocked the fight bk while he was under allegedly cause him and his team didn't want to leave the welterweight division so no it's not utter balls pooParson Cross wrote:Absolute total utter and complete bullshit about K9.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world lever operator
Maybe he agrees with the opinions in there that Brook isn't world class and would be beaten by all the top welterweights, he certainly isn't the only one that holds that view.Parson Cross wrote:Billy - as a boxing man why do agree with a post that has little fact in it ?
Would you accuse Alexander of not wanting a piece of brook when HE pulled out injured ?
WTF is this K9 nonsense ?!?
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Does he also agree that Brook didn't want to know Alexander ? That's what the first post said.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Genuinely, who cares what Billy Nelson thinks? This post will be put to bed one way or another in July.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
You'll have to ask Billy that, all he said was that he'd favour the names mentioned and Amir Khan to beat Kell.Parson Cross wrote:Does he also agree that Brook didn't want to know Alexander ? That's what the first post said.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
I have - and he hasnt replied.
Right now I see what you're getting at re K9.
Why would Brook have stepped up to LM all those years ago ?
While we're on that subject - this is the same K9 that shit his pants when Rhodes offered to step in.
Right now I see what you're getting at re K9.
Why would Brook have stepped up to LM all those years ago ?
While we're on that subject - this is the same K9 that shit his pants when Rhodes offered to step in.
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Like most people I have been waiting for the last 3 years for Brook to step up and prove hes world class. Instead all I have seen are an endless stream of eliminators, final eliminators and "keep busy fights" all against sub par/poor opposition.
Rio
Re above you do know he fights either Paulie or Porter on or before 19/7 ?
Rio
Re above you do know he fights either Paulie or Porter on or before 19/7 ?
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
I've not been following his news for a bit who are they looking at for July?DMA1987 wrote:Genuinely, who cares what Billy Nelson thinks? This post will be put to bed one way or another in July.
It seems people are finally catching up to what I've been saying for three years.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
The winner of Porter v Malignaggi for the IBF.SNG wrote:I've not been following his news for a bit who are they looking at for July?DMA1987 wrote:Genuinely, who cares what Billy Nelson thinks? This post will be put to bed one way or another in July.
It seems people are finally catching up to what I've been saying for three years.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Can't argue with that. Paulie would be a very winnable fight for Brook, I don't know enough about Porter to properly have an opinion, but from what I've seen I don't think he's anything massively special.DMA1987 wrote:The winner of Porter v Malignaggi for the IBF.SNG wrote:I've not been following his news for a bit who are they looking at for July?DMA1987 wrote:Genuinely, who cares what Billy Nelson thinks? This post will be put to bed one way or another in July.
It seems people are finally catching up to what I've been saying for three years.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Let's get real he's more likely to rematch Michael Jennings in his next fight, rather than fight Pauli or Porter.
Re: Am not sold on Kell Brook as a world level operator
Why is that chief?wadey wrote:Let's get real he's more likely to rematch Michael Jennings in his next fight, rather than fight Pauli or Porter.