Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by palooka »

It would be a shame if he retired, it was an injury stoppage and a cruel one that it happened so quickly. He took some solid bangs and is not chinny, he looks solid at the weight - he got knocked out by big, big hitters a stone and a half up.
mrbishi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 19:13

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by mrbishi »

Was it the same eye that got swollen by lebedev?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by jameswilson »

Tough on Enzo.

Always slightly emotional when someone gets pulled out in that manner.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by crusader »

columbo wrote:The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.
I missed it.

Was the swelling not caused by a punch/punches?
girv
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 84
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 20:42

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by girv »

crusader wrote:
columbo wrote:The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.
I missed it.

Was the swelling not caused by a punch/punches?
Yeah, the swelling was caused by a Braemer left in the last few seconds of the first round. He was more or less blind in that eye straight away. If it was stopped then it would have still been a Braemer stoppage.

Not sure why it would have been a no contest?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by lefty »

crusader wrote:
columbo wrote:The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.
I missed it.

Was the swelling not caused by a punch/punches?
I found it hard to tell myself as quite often they would throw the back hand at the same time and clash heads and come together.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

crusader wrote:
columbo wrote:The fight should of been called off in the first few rounds and it of been ruled a no contest.
I missed it.

Was the swelling not caused by a punch/punches?
There was a head clash in the first and Braehmer was cut it's possible Enzo also damaged his eye here. But Braehmer piled on the pressure and that worsened the damage.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28545
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by Coco »

Reminded me of Khan v Barrera
mrbishi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 19:13

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by mrbishi »

Does anyone know who was originally scheduled for Pulev ?
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by jessi »

Brave brave Enzo, I hope he carries on ! Would love to see a rematch, I'm pretty certain it's a 50/50 fight if a cut or swelling don't happen
zero
Cruiserweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by zero »

I doubt Braehmer would be interested in the rematch as he was feeling Enzo's power. If I were Enzo I would give myself two years unless of course the eye injury is serious. Enzo has nothing to be ashamed of he could still have a future at 175.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

mrbishi wrote:Does anyone know who was originally scheduled for Pulev ?
Danny Hughes I believe.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by mickey1975 »

Enzo could have done him with two eyes.
SMALL AXE1
Middleweight
Posts: 233
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 09:40

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by SMALL AXE1 »

Enzo is a strong light heavy these days. Rematch!!
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by Ian1973 »

mickey1975 wrote:Enzo could have done him with two eyes.

I don't think he would've to be honest. The eye injury changed the fight. Braehmer decided his best policy was to throw a one - two then grab. Point scoring scoring shots, then smother because he knew the chances of Enzo lasting the distance with that eye were practically nill.

So disappointing for Enzo though, there is no worse way for a fight to be decided than by cuts because it's such an injustice and no reflection of a mans ability.

I still haven't got over Vitali vs Lennox all those years ago when Vitali was ahead on all scorecards and looking the likely winner but done by cuts.

I think boxers should be allowed to box wearing masks - that would solve the problem. :OhYes:
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by JimJim2009 »

mrbishi wrote:Does anyone know who was originally scheduled for Pulev ?
Oliver McCall's son, then Danny Hughes, then the eventual opponent.

What all 3 have in common is that none of them should have been considered in the first place. Okay, we know they're not going to keep Pulev busy against Wilder or Arreola but come on, there should be a better effort with the opposition.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4588
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by JC »

JimJim2009 wrote:
mrbishi wrote:Does anyone know who was originally scheduled for Pulev ?
Oliver McCall's son, then Danny Hughes, then the eventual opponent.

What all 3 have in common is that none of them should have been considered in the first place. Okay, we know they're not going to keep Pulev busy against Wilder or Arreola but come on, there should be a better effort with the opposition.
Did't know his son was a fighter. Looking at his record it's interesting that his three losses have been stoppages/KOs since his Dad was so famous for his uberchin.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by JimJim2009 »

J-C wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:
mrbishi wrote:Does anyone know who was originally scheduled for Pulev ?
Oliver McCall's son, then Danny Hughes, then the eventual opponent.

What all 3 have in common is that none of them should have been considered in the first place. Okay, we know they're not going to keep Pulev busy against Wilder or Arreola but come on, there should be a better effort with the opposition.
Did't know his son was a fighter. Looking at his record it's interesting that his three losses have been stoppages/KOs since his Dad was so famous for his uberchin.
Last month, Oliver made history, he defeated a polish boxer who'd beaten his son last year ! Which I was personally pleased about, it's a bit much beating father and son as you pad out your unbeaten record.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by TheCobra »

In on the Killtaker wrote:It's too bad Braehmer was not given the opportunity to prolong his beating for just a few more rounds.
Pretty sad thing that you just said and I think there's no place for that on a boxing forum, but it raised something I think I noticed - you know what, I felt in a way that Braehmer actually showed mercy towards Enzo.

You could look at what he did in 2 ways, first way being it was just his German efficiency shining through, he stayed away from Enzo's power and chipped away until the inevitable stoppage.

Second way you could say he didn't overly go for the injury, in fact he rarely hit Enzo again on the eye to my viewing and he didn't overly go for Enzo full stop.

Maybe I'm reading it wrong and Braehmer was just doing the bare minimum as per his style, but he seemed to show Enzo a bit of mercy in there to me, which if correct is quite commendable really.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Braehmer v Maccarinnelli

Post by TheCobra »

I just read this post-fight quote from Braehmer:

"When you see it like that, you want to hit it even more. That's boxing," Braehmer said. "I caught him well with my left. Then I wanted to be too spectacular. I wanted too much. It was good that it ended then."
Read more at http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/sport/stor ... fjd7seg.99

So scrap my last comment, haha!
Post Reply