Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23192
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
And Bob is from Darlington, no support in Leeds.
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
yes strange place for a fight a bit like degale in Bristol. Also same night as matchroom show which is annoying.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13365
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Thought Tony looked a bit nervous at the weigh in, and he's going to be even more nervous in the first few rounds as McKenzie looks up for it.
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Ovill starts like a train and he has a bit of bully in him; if he see's someone apprehensive or unsure he puts it on them.
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Nice to see you still about Johnnyjohnnygreaves wrote:jason rowland and tony know ovill comes out scrapping.ovill was at the peacock for years. Jay was always about. They won't be silly at all with this. I think after a tough few rounds. Tony out boxes ovill for a points win Skeete is also better than the last win. That boy he fought was a messer Very good at it. He'd make a hell of a lot of fighters look bad. I was holding the other boys spit bucket and I was doing some great little defensive moves that go unnoticed by the vast majority of fans. I think both these lads win againpalooka wrote:McKenzie may get Conquest out quick, he is like a bull at a gate early on.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23246
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Gonna have to Tivo tonights card as i'm out with the mrs
Not the best show ive ever seen but still a few decent match ups
Im slightly leaning towards Conquest retaining his Commonwealth strap after weathering an early McKenzie storm to outpoint Ovill
Buglioni might have a few questions asked of him but i still see him winning wide on the cards
Im gonna stick my neck out a bit here but i reckon Skeete will box to a decision win :surprised:
Hopefully im not too drunk when i get in later and i'll watch Bradley/Pacquiao 2
Im slightly leaning towards Conquest retaining his Commonwealth strap after weathering an early McKenzie storm to outpoint Ovill
Buglioni might have a few questions asked of him but i still see him winning wide on the cards
Im gonna stick my neck out a bit here but i reckon Skeete will box to a decision win :surprised:
Hopefully im not too drunk when i get in later and i'll watch Bradley/Pacquiao 2
-
Old Jack J
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
What channel is it on?
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Mckenzie is 80/1 to win in the first round
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5523
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
I'm avin some a that!!Rustynut wrote:Mckenzie is 80/1 to win in the first round
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Seen him cut from 80's to 25's in the last hour best be quick.forcefraser wrote:I'm avin some a that!!Rustynut wrote:Mckenzie is 80/1 to win in the first round
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23246
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
The channel that shall not be namedOld Jack J wrote:What channel is it on?
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
it's now 20-1......gutted. You have to get in there quick!ShadrachSimmo wrote:Seen him cut from 80's to 25's in the last hour best be quick.forcefraser wrote:I'm avin some a that!!Rustynut wrote:Mckenzie is 80/1 to win in the first round
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
I see this show as a decent undercard for Pacman V Bradley
BN certainly delivering at the moment
BN certainly delivering at the moment
-
Old Jack J
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Thankyou for all your help.handsofstone wrote:The channel that shall not be namedOld Jack J wrote:What channel is it on?
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
It's not cheap eithermickey1975 wrote:The town hall is not an easy place to rent.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
2 out of 3 aint bad!Michael bennt wrote:All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.
Something like a 32/1 show I think
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
I did doubles and the treble and got back £43.88 from the double of £1.50, 8/1+ 9/4=Boxing Prospect wrote:2 out of 3 aint bad!Michael bennt wrote:All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.
Something like a 32/1 show I think
-
Michael bennt
- Heavyweight

Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Am not a gambling man but I got 2 out of 3 right which isn't bad, I knew conquest and frank had been matched all wrongdigzee wrote:I did doubles and the treble and got back £43.88 from the double of £1.50, 8/1+ 9/4=Boxing Prospect wrote:2 out of 3 aint bad!Michael bennt wrote:All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.
Something like a 32/1 show I think
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
quote="Michael bennt"]All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.[/quote][/quote][/quote]
Well done sir. I may take more notice next time you make predictions on here
Well done sir. I may take more notice next time you make predictions on here
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Am not a gambling man but I got 2 out of 3 right which isn't bad, I knew conquest and frank had been matched all wrong[/quote]Michael bennt wrote:I did doubles and the treble and got back £43.88 from the double of £1.50, 8/1+ 9/4=Boxing Prospect wrote:2 out of 3 aint bad!Michael bennt wrote:All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.
Something like a 32/1 show I think
Funnily enough the one I got wrong was what I thought would be the banker, Skeete by decision, which could be classed as the biggest shocker of them all.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Well done mate! I won £90 off a tenner on Buglioni losingBoxing Prospect wrote:2 out of 3 aint bad!Michael bennt wrote:All face banana skins on Saturday, I know it's a long shot but I think all 3 of them will get beat.
Something like a 32/1 show I think
-
johnnygreaves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 910
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 07:41
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Brad boxed & looked like I knew he would against a fighter who came forward.the last boy he boxed would make anyone look bad.what was quite hard to get my head round was matching keen with warbuton.keen is good but William when he feels like it is a good fighter.must say it was blinding seeing a few shocks.being as close as the ropes to the action made you feel ovills power.tony q has nothing To be ashamed of.although a few home boys lost.f w put on a top show there
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23246
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Buglioni, Skeete and Conquest
Nailed ithandsofstone wrote:Gonna have to Tivo tonights card as i'm out with the mrsNot the best show ive ever seen but still a few decent match ups
Im slightly leaning towards Conquest retaining his Commonwealth strap after weathering an early McKenzie storm to outpoint Ovill
Buglioni might have a few questions asked of him but i still see him winning wide on the cards
Im gonna stick my neck out a bit here but i reckon Skeete will box to a decision win :surprised:
Hopefully im not too drunk when i get in later and i'll watch Bradley/Pacquiao 2