Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

11th to vargas. I have to look back through the thread but I think I only have 3 or 4
for allekh so he needs a last round ko
Victor*KC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 313
Joined: 15 Oct 2006, 00:52

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Victor*KC »

I need a stream :cry:
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Lackeos »

Round 12: Very close, possibly 10-9 Vargas. Both fighters started out the round fighting brutally on equal terms. After a brief void, they resumed fighting with Vargas getting mildly the better of it. The final minute of the round was extremely brutal; possibly with Vargas barely getting the better of it.

The HBO crew seems to think Khabib got the fight. I think Vargas probably got it.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

all vargas needed to do was no get knocked out and he did that so
he won 7 or 8 rounds.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Lackeos »

2x 115-113, 1x 117-111, UD for Jessie Vargas. I basically agree. Roughly an 8-4 or so fight, IMO.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

I had it 114-114

I thought Khabib won a few of the later rounds that people on here gave Vargas. Don't see how Vargas won the last two.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Lackeos »

Don't be fooled by the outcome, though, Allakhverdiev and Vargas are very close to equals. They seem to be equally matched in a lot of areas. Vargas was just busier at times, landing more power shots.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

I'm watching a French stream and the commentators seem to think Khabib won clearly, but it was a very close fight and hard to argue the decision.

Beltran-Usmanee should go the full twelve. I'm leaning to Beltran.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22988
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by handsofstone »

Hi-hat/SS all the best tonight mate
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

crusader wrote:I had it 114-114

I thought Khabib won a few of the later rounds that people on here gave Vargas. Don't see how Vargas won the last two.
Vargas vs Provodnikov to come ?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

I'd like to see it.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

usmanee threw a lot more but the punches were meaningless and he was mainly
focused on staying away. beltram threw much less but they were all power shots
and he was much more in control. I will be the only one to score round 1 for beltran
JMac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2307
Joined: 06 Sep 2007, 14:41

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by JMac »

Does anybody have a good stream they can PM me. I the one I am using sucks.
Thanks
gills13
Middleweight
Posts: 10
Joined: 24 Aug 2013, 23:37

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by gills13 »

Hows the crowd pro pac/TB
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

my opinion is the same for 2 and 3 as the first. I am scoring the opposite of all the people
talking on tv. the exact opposite. not only that, I think beltran is going to ko this guy
if he doesn't run out of gas
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

sucracristo wrote:my opinion is the same for 2 and 3 as the first. I am scoring the opposite of all the people
talking on tv. the exact opposite. not only that, I think beltran is going to ko this guy
if he doesn't run out of gas
I agree with your scoring for 1 and 3, but I thought the second was a clear round for Usmanee. He seemed to land significantly more and Beltran didn't have enough moments to outdo that.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2694
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Jaywheel »

Good rd by Beltran. Hits with a lot more authority than Usmanee.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

4th definitely beltran
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Blodhemn »

I hope to never see Khabib nor Vargas again unless its to get KOd by Provodnikov. Vargas, a drainer who can't punch and Khabib a puncher who doesn't throw enough, especially after hurting his opponent. Garbage fight/Draw.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

5th beltran. he's getting a little careless and giving up cheap shots.
he doesn't have much respect for this guy. his body shots and also
holding the guy down when he bends at the waist is going to wear
out usmanee
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

beltran let some of the pressure off and was backing up for some reason.
he still landed the better shots of the round but I could understand if
someone scored it for usman. I guess i'll give it to usm, even though
I guess I just don't like his style
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

even round. couldn't score the 7th. not enough to separate them
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

Hi-hat wrote:
sucracristo wrote:my opinion is the same for 2 and 3 as the first. I am scoring the opposite of all the people
talking on tv. the exact opposite. not only that, I think beltran is going to ko this guy
if he doesn't run out of gas
Yep. Body language speaks volumes. It seems it's only a matter of time until the pressure and power of Beltran becomes too much.
It looked like that, but Beltran's latest KO was in round 9, so let's see.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

8th beltran for same reason as all the others I gave him.
he lands all the meaningful punches of the round
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

Hi-hat wrote:
sucracristo wrote:my opinion is the same for 2 and 3 as the first. I am scoring the opposite of all the people
talking on tv. the exact opposite. not only that, I think beltran is going to ko this guy
if he doesn't run out of gas
Yep. Body language speaks volumes. It seems it's only a matter of time until the pressure and power of Beltran becomes too much.
It looked like that, but Beltran's latest KO was in round 9, so let's see.
Post Reply