Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by CheckHook »

8-2 Manny.
rmz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 209
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 14:07

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by rmz »

8-1 PAC with one even
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

10th for pac
8-2 for pac
Bradley needs a ko or hihat wins his bet
AZOSI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 07 May 2009, 14:59

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by AZOSI »

On to the next, this one is over. 8-2...Bradley is back to being an also ran.
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by CheckHook »

8-3 Manny.... close round, negative tactics from Bradley, but he got the job done.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

Bradley did a little better in the 11th, basically because he ran more and didn't
get hit as much and he countered for a few shots. I still gave that one to pac
but I understand if it was a Bradley round
DieHard24
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 20:49

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by DieHard24 »

8-3 Pac. I don't see how Bradley can win a decision.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

Pac clearly winning the final round......
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

8-4 Pac

Bradley needs another robbery......absolutely no way this should be anything other than a Pac win.
macaca
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1296
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 07:49

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by macaca »

Goodnight Timmy .........
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by CheckHook »

9-3 Manny. Bradley had a good go at it in the 12th, but didn't do enough to take the round, Pacquiao just too good.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by jameswilson »

Tim Bradley raises his hands at the end. And we thought he couldn't be more deluded than when he said in the post fight interview and the build up to this fight that he thought he won the first fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

I wonder if the people who thought Bradley won the first fight are busy planning how to justify him deserving not to lose this.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Lackeos »

Round 1: Very close 10-9 Pacquiao.
Round 2: Very close 10-9 Bradley.
Round 3: Extremely clear 10-9 Pacquiao.
Round 4: Close 10-9 Bradley.
Round 5: Very close 10-9 Bradley.
Round 6: Close 10-9 Pacquiao
Round 7: Extremely clear 10-9 Pacquiao.
Round 8: Extremely close 10-9 Bradley.
Round 9: Pretty close 10-9 Pacquiao.
Round 10: Very clear 10-9 Pacquiao
Round 11: Extremely close 10-9 Pacquiao.
Round 12: Extremely close 10-9 Pacquiao.
Overall: 116-112 Pacquiao.

97% of people in texting / tweeting poll had it for Pacquiao.
Last edited by Lackeos on 13 Apr 2014, 01:10, edited 1 time in total.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

Funny to hear Russian commentators who think that Manny lost :)
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by sucracristo »

Hi-hat wrote:If Manny didn't win this fight, I'm done.
if Bradley gets this decision, i'll take your place and leave boxrec and never watch boxing again.
AZOSI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 07 May 2009, 14:59

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by AZOSI »

Should be 117-111 PAC...If your being genourous you could go 116-112. Cards will always be interesting.
macaca
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1296
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 07:49

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by macaca »

clear pacman win
AZOSI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 07 May 2009, 14:59

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by AZOSI »

Hi-hat wrote:Should have been this way the first fight.


This fight was actually closer than the first fight IMO, and PAC still won clearly.
generic screen name
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 631
Joined: 11 Feb 2006, 16:28

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by generic screen name »

Did anyone actually think that Bradley won the first fight?
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

What were judges scores?
macaca
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1296
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 07:49

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by macaca »

... here we go ...crazy town
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

generic screen name wrote:Did anyone actually think that Bradley won the first fight?
Yes...somehow.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7976
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by Lenny Cravats »

generic screen name wrote:Did anyone actually think that Bradley won the first fight?
A few posters did.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Pacquiao/Bradley II (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

No Tomorrow wrote:What were judges scores?
116-112 X2
118-110
Post Reply