Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Tonight in Chester...should be two excellent fights. Chris v Fagan is for the WBF inter-continental, whilst Paul V Kanalas is the WBF international belt!
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
thepocketrocket wrote:Tonight in Chester...should be two excellent fights. Chris v Fagan is for the WBF inter-continental, whilst Paul V Kanalas is the WBF international belt!
Is this on a kickboxing show and licensed by the gba?
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
I wonder what the difference is between international and intercontinental?
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
bripez wrote:I wonder what the difference is between international and intercontinental?
If it's wbf it's crap mate
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Yes, because WBC interim sliver youth belts are just soooo good!spudder56 wrote:bripez wrote:I wonder what the difference is between international and intercontinental?
If it's wbf it's crap mate
To answer the question, inter-continental is the second tier belt, whilst the international is third tier
In the end, the fights make the belt, no matter what organisation you are under. And Goodwin v Fagan was an absolute war...gone down a treat in the Irish websites! Made for TV fight!
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
At least the WBC belts get you a ranking with them, who wants to be ranked by the WBF? The first tier belt is worthless, so what does that make the second and third tier belts?thepocketrocket wrote:Yes, because WBC interim sliver youth belts are just soooo good!spudder56 wrote:bripez wrote:I wonder what the difference is between international and intercontinental?
If it's wbf it's crap mate![]()
To answer the question, inter-continental is the second tier belt, whilst the international is third tier
In the end, the fights make the belt, no matter what organisation you are under. And Goodwin v Fagan was an absolute war...gone down a treat in the Irish websites! Made for TV fight!
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
I was at show thought Goodwin v fagan was brill! A total war and Counihan was good aswell!
I thought it was a good show!
I thought it was a good show!
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Do you want to get into a debate about sanctioning bodies??? I think the fact that even most boxing fans don't know who an organisations champion is, with all the layer of belts, then all credibility is shot anyway, no matter of any history
-
Darcy Delaney
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 634
- Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 07:56
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
They were both good fights though
-
markfightoptions
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
They arnt advertised as anything they arnt, it would be different if you said it was WBC title and then the WBF turn up instead.
Worthless to who? Both boxers are delighted with their little belts, something nice to put on the mantlepiece when they retire.
Worthless to who? Both boxers are delighted with their little belts, something nice to put on the mantlepiece when they retire.
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
It was licensed by the GBA, Lee Murtagh who was working Fagan's corner does an article in a free magazine we get round where I live and he confirmed that in it.Jakemilo wrote:thepocketrocket wrote:Tonight in Chester...should be two excellent fights. Chris v Fagan is for the WBF inter-continental, whilst Paul V Kanalas is the WBF international belt!
Is this on a kickboxing show and licensed by the gba?
-
markfightoptions
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Im the promoter so you can take a confirmation from me, it was not a kickboxing show.The_Don1 wrote: It was licensed by the GBA, Lee Murtagh who was working Fagan's corner does an article in a free magazine we get round where I live and he confirmed that in it.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
White collar/semi-pro undercard with 3 pro fights wasn’t it?markfightoptions wrote:Im the promoter so you can take a confirmation from me, it was not a kickboxing show.The_Don1 wrote: It was licensed by the GBA, Lee Murtagh who was working Fagan's corner does an article in a free magazine we get round where I live and he confirmed that in it.
Why wont the BBBoC allow that sort of arrangement? Happens a lot in Europe e.g. France and Spain.
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
This is the only way that a small promoter can make it pay - mix up "pro", with amateur boxing and maybe other disciplines such as kick boxing.slapbangwhallop wrote:White collar/semi-pro undercard with 3 pro fights wasn’t it?markfightoptions wrote:Im the promoter so you can take a confirmation from me, it was not a kickboxing show.The_Don1 wrote: It was licensed by the GBA, Lee Murtagh who was working Fagan's corner does an article in a free magazine we get round where I live and he confirmed that in it.
Why wont the BBBoC allow that sort of arrangement? Happens a lot in Europe e.g. France and Spain.
At the end of the day, the promoter needs bums on seats.
I wonder what the BBBofC regulation is (or even if one exists) ?
A few years ago their opinion was that amateurs and pros should never mix. Then came along the Amir Khan / Kindelan amateur fight.
A leading promoter was going to promote more pro/am shows (with the full support of the BBBofC) until Khan then turned pro and nothing else was heard !
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Hopefully the board would allow it, great exposure for the amateurs on the bill and the promoters gets extra ticket sales, without the extra costs, everyone's a winner.bripez wrote:This is the only way that a small promoter can make it pay - mix up "pro", with amateur boxing and maybe other disciplines such as kick boxing.slapbangwhallop wrote:White collar/semi-pro undercard with 3 pro fights wasn’t it?markfightoptions wrote:
Im the promoter so you can take a confirmation from me, it was not a kickboxing show.
Why wont the BBBoC allow that sort of arrangement? Happens a lot in Europe e.g. France and Spain.
At the end of the day, the promoter needs bums on seats.
I wonder what the BBBofC regulation is (or even if one exists) ?
A few years ago their opinion was that amateurs and pros should never mix. Then came along the Amir Khan / Kindelan amateur fight.
A leading promoter was going to promote more pro/am shows (with the full support of the BBBofC) until Khan then turned pro and nothing else was heard !
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
That is my point - why wouldn't they allow it ?expe wrote: Hopefully the board would allow it, great exposure for the amateurs on the bill and the promoters gets extra ticket sales, without the extra costs, everyone's a winner.
They have allowed it before, why not now ?
What is the Rule/regulation - does one exist ? - if so, did it exist previously ? etc. etc.
The BBBofC are a club that seem to make it up as they go along - often in the favour of certain individuals within the sport.
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Has anyone tried to put on a show like that? I doubt there's anything in the rules regarding this sort of thing and it would probably be down to the board's discretion, I can understand them not wanting kickboxing and other sports on there, but the amateur boxers of today are the professionals of tomorrow, working with professional promoters and managers can only be good for them.bripez wrote:That is my point - why wouldn't they allow it ?expe wrote: Hopefully the board would allow it, great exposure for the amateurs on the bill and the promoters gets extra ticket sales, without the extra costs, everyone's a winner.
They have allowed it before, why not now ?
What is the Rule/regulation - does one exist ? - if so, did it exist previously ? etc. etc.
The BBBofC are a club that seem to make it up as they go along - often in the favour of certain individuals within the sport.
-
markfightoptions
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
I attempted it, told the area council secretary of my plans and was informed it would not be permitted.
Unfortunately we are In a small city with only a couple of pro boxers, the format I ran on Saturday night works for us. Every person fighting on my show was fully medicaled and insured for personal injury (yes, the semi pros as well) full eye tests and medicals performed by doctors. The semi pro boxing was overseen to pro standards by gba inspectors and refs.
Unfortunately we are In a small city with only a couple of pro boxers, the format I ran on Saturday night works for us. Every person fighting on my show was fully medicaled and insured for personal injury (yes, the semi pros as well) full eye tests and medicals performed by doctors. The semi pro boxing was overseen to pro standards by gba inspectors and refs.
-
Floatlikeabutterfly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 175
- Joined: 28 Jul 2010, 14:21
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Paul Economides v David Kanalas for the WBF intercontinental title? What a joke, I have seen Kanalas on a few occasions and he is awful, before this fight he had already lost 10 times, 9 by stoppage all in the first 4 rounds! How can the WBF sanction this as some sort of title fight?
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Well the WBA allowed him to fight for their third tier title (international belt) last AprilFloatlikeabutterfly wrote:Paul Economides v David Kanalas for the WBF intercontinental title? What a joke, I have seen Kanalas on a few occasions and he is awful, before this fight he had already lost 10 times, 9 by stoppage all in the first 4 rounds! How can the WBF sanction this as some sort of title fight?
-
markfightoptions
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
WBF International title, if your going to make a derogatory comment at least get the facts right.Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:Paul Economides v David Kanalas for the WBF intercontinental title? What a joke, I have seen Kanalas on a few occasions and he is awful, before this fight he had already lost 10 times, 9 by stoppage all in the first 4 rounds! How can the WBF sanction this as some sort of title fight?
-
Floatlikeabutterfly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 175
- Joined: 28 Jul 2010, 14:21
Re: Chris Goodwin v Oisin Fagan, Paul Economides v David Kanalas
Sorry mate, not wanting to slag your promotion, I know it's takes a lot of time and effort to put a show together. Just my feelings on having seen Kanalas before, I think Paul is much better than that, as he proved.markfightoptions wrote:WBF International title, if your going to make a derogatory comment at least get the facts right.Floatlikeabutterfly wrote:Paul Economides v David Kanalas for the WBF intercontinental title? What a joke, I have seen Kanalas on a few occasions and he is awful, before this fight he had already lost 10 times, 9 by stoppage all in the first 4 rounds! How can the WBF sanction this as some sort of title fight?
Good luck with future promotions!