Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.
It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins W12No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
117-111 or 116-112.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Unless Kell pulls out (wouldnt be surprised) Porter has to fight him within 90 days or relenquish his belt.gilgamesh wrote:I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.
It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Bigger upsets have happened. Hopkins is 49 years old. Get over yourself if you think it can't happen
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I doubt a fight between Porter and Brook happens that quickly
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I'd bet on Kell pulling out.columbo wrote:Unless Kell pulls out (wouldnt be surprised) Porter has to fight him within 90 days or relenquish his belt.gilgamesh wrote:I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.
It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
Even if he doesn't Porter will kick his ass thoroughly.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I'd be shocked if that was to happen. Now if we are talking Hopkins vs. Stevenson that's another story.ikorolev wrote:LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Anything is possible, but I would say chances of Shumenov winning is 1:20No Tomorrow wrote:Bigger upsets have happened. Hopkins is 49 years old. Get over yourself if you think it can't happen
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins is a legend. Shame he doesn't get the Pacquiao/Mayweather Jr. love/coverage
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
That is pretty funny. The only one I can foresee KO'ing Hopkins at Light Heavyweight is Kovalev, nobody else.ikorolev wrote:LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
He has to. Porter was supposed to fight him after alexander but was entitled to a voluntary but they were supposed to do it before todays date, etc. Anyway Porter got an extension of the proviso that the fight happens within 90 days.No Tomorrow wrote:I doubt a fight between Porter and Brook happens that quickly
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Cant buy this alien act thoughgilgamesh wrote:I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Absolutely different story. Shumenov wouldn't last more than 4 rounds against Stevenson or Kovalev.MachoTime wrote:I'd be shocked if that was to happen. Now if we are talking Hopkins vs. Stevenson that's another story.ikorolev wrote:LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins sure loves masks. I guess if you had as ugly a mug as he has you would too. 
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Eh it's whatever. Given that he hasn't knocked out anyone since 2004 "The Executioner" nickname wasn't exactly fitting him these dayscolumbo wrote:Cant buy this alien act thoughgilgamesh wrote:I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Wouldn't surprise me. He's a big LHWcolumbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I would even say shaky.columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
He's not looking that healthy to me.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Could be nerves that. Just fighting the reputation of Hopkins is probably pretty damn intimidating.ikorolev wrote:I would even say shaky.columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
-
No Tomorrow
- Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins should dominate. Would hate for that weird thought become true
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Ditto. Or is it he looks like he has the lack of "Eye of The Tiger"columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?