Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.

It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
Hopkins W12

117-111 or 116-112.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.

It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
Unless Kell pulls out (wouldnt be surprised) Porter has to fight him within 90 days or relenquish his belt.
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Bigger upsets have happened. Hopkins is 49 years old. Get over yourself if you think it can't happen
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

I doubt a fight between Porter and Brook happens that quickly
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I think Porter vs Thurman would be a good fight. I don't think Thurman has done anything yet to put himself in a league where Porter has to prove he deserves a fight with him. They're both on the same level right now to me at least as far as accomplishment.

It would be a good fight between 2 good, young Welterweights.
Unless Kell pulls out (wouldnt be surprised) Porter has to fight him within 90 days or relenquish his belt.
I'd bet on Kell pulling out.

Even if he doesn't Porter will kick his ass thoroughly.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

ikorolev wrote:
No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.
I'd be shocked if that was to happen. Now if we are talking Hopkins vs. Stevenson that's another story.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

No Tomorrow wrote:Bigger upsets have happened. Hopkins is 49 years old. Get over yourself if you think it can't happen
Anything is possible, but I would say chances of Shumenov winning is 1:20
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Hopkins is a legend. Shame he doesn't get the Pacquiao/Mayweather Jr. love/coverage
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

ikorolev wrote:
No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.
That is pretty funny. The only one I can foresee KO'ing Hopkins at Light Heavyweight is Kovalev, nobody else.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

No Tomorrow wrote:I doubt a fight between Porter and Brook happens that quickly
He has to. Porter was supposed to fight him after alexander but was entitled to a voluntary but they were supposed to do it before todays date, etc. Anyway Porter got an extension of the proviso that the fight happens within 90 days.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:
columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.
Cant buy this alien act though :lol:
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

MachoTime wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
No Tomorrow wrote:Last predictions on the main event? I've had a weird feeling all week that Shumenov gets a stoppage win. Hope not. I'd like to see Hop vs winner of Stevenson/Fonfara
LOL at Shumenov KOing anybody with a pulse to say nothing of BHop.
I'd be shocked if that was to happen. Now if we are talking Hopkins vs. Stevenson that's another story.
Absolutely different story. Shumenov wouldn't last more than 4 rounds against Stevenson or Kovalev.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

Hopkins sure loves masks. I guess if you had as ugly a mug as he has you would too. :lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
columbo wrote:Im rooting for Hopkins here. A 49 yr old to be doing what he's doing is freakish as we all know.
I'm rooting for Hopkins too. I usually am.
Cant buy this alien act though :lol:
Eh it's whatever. Given that he hasn't knocked out anyone since 2004 "The Executioner" nickname wasn't exactly fitting him these days :lol:
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Wouldn't surprise me. He's a big LHW
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by ikorolev »

columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
I would even say shaky.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

He's not looking that healthy to me.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

ikorolev wrote:
columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
I would even say shaky.
Could be nerves that. Just fighting the reputation of Hopkins is probably pretty damn intimidating.
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Hopkins should dominate. Would hate for that weird thought become true
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Ditto. Or is it he looks like he has the lack of "Eye of The Tiger"
Post Reply