Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

For RBR threads only
Post Reply
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Would be awesome if Hopkins got the stoppage. That'd be huge
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

MachoTime wrote:
columbo wrote:Is it me or is Shumenov looking very gaunt?
Ditto. Or is it he looks like he has the lack of "Eye of The Tiger"
:lol: .... he looks like he's shitting himself aswell lol
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

This is gonna be a complete stinker I can sense it...
No Tomorrow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by No Tomorrow »

Probably
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

1-0 Shumenov
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by diddy »

Omg Shumenov stinks.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.

10-10
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

First round to Shumenov. I hope the rest of the fight isn't like the first because if it is we are in for one boring and brutal fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

1-0 Shumenov but not much to split them.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by expe »

10-10

Neither fighter did anything worth shouting about, took Hopkins a minute to throw a punch.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.

10-10
I thought Shumenov landed some more jabs :lol:
MachoTime
Middleweight
Posts: 1420
Joined: 18 Nov 2013, 02:13

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by MachoTime »

gilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.

10-10
9-9 no?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

MachoTime wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I rarely score rounds even, but I couldn't find any reason to score that 1st round for anybody.

10-10
9-9 no?
I don't think so, but like I said I rarely score rounds even.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

2nd to Shumenov also. He did slightly better than Hopkins.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by crusader »

columbo wrote:2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
I agree.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

columbo wrote:2-0 Shumenov .... just on output more than anything. Not much going on at all.
20-19 Shumenov for me, and yeah not much happening.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by expe »

20-19 Shumenov

Nicked it purely on workrate, Hopkins landed a couple of right hands but nothing else.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2694
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Jaywheel »

Shumenov is composed, should use hos jab more
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by gilgamesh »

30-28 Shumenov
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17243
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by Baby Face Finster »

3rd to Hopkins.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Found that 3rd round to score. Probably Hopkins as he scored the more eye catching shots. Hopkins seems to be only throwing about 5 punches per round though!
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by expe »

29-29

Hopkins landed some clean punches, including a good right hand while Shumenov was complaining, another close round.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Both of these guys would/will get massacred by Stevenson and Kovalev though I think.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)

Post by lefty »

Hopkins starting to get into a bit of a groove now.
Post Reply