He's too slow for it to matter. He's not Dawson.columbo wrote:Shumenov got some long ass arms. Not helping him much though.
Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
109-100 Hopkins
Shumenov down from a right hand in the 11th, could be looking at a first Hopkins KO win since De La Hoya 9 1/2 years ago.
Shumenov down from a right hand in the 11th, could be looking at a first Hopkins KO win since De La Hoya 9 1/2 years ago.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Well Hopkins gets back the point from that even round. Makes the 12th round more interesting than it would've been otherwise.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
He got dropped by Jones after that too, but he got up and handle his business though.JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
And still won.JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
-
big train express
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 154
- Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
hopkins had shumenov at his mercy and still played it safe. smh. no entertainment value.
dominating performance nonetheless.
dominating performance nonetheless.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.Baby Face Finster wrote:And still won.JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
117-110 Hopkins
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Dont see him doing that with Stevenson but could be wrong.big train express wrote:hopkins had shumenov at his mercy and still played it safe. smh. no entertainment value.
dominating performance nonetheless.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopkins still doing his thing.
118-110, The Legend continues
118-110, The Legend continues
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
119-109 Hopkins
Completely dominated, took the piss out of Shumenov tonight. Amazing that he can still do it at 49, my Dad's the same age, he's currently led on the settee, pissed, half asleep and has probably spilled wine all over himself.
Completely dominated, took the piss out of Shumenov tonight. Amazing that he can still do it at 49, my Dad's the same age, he's currently led on the settee, pissed, half asleep and has probably spilled wine all over himself.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Plus he made Hopkins fake a low blow from a body punch that would have led to a stoppage had the ref not bought his act.columbo wrote:Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.Baby Face Finster wrote:And still won.JeanClaude Van Damme wrote:Joe still got dropped by an old man.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Hopefully Jim Gray asks Hopkins about a potential Stevenson fight.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
It was a bit low, but Hopkins made the most of it he could, 5 minute rest was exactly what he needed at the time.Baby Face Finster wrote:Plus he made Hopkins fake a low blow from a body punch that would have led to a stoppage had the ref not bought his act.columbo wrote:Joe was about 36 himself at the time aswell. He wasnt in his prime.Baby Face Finster wrote:
And still won.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Split decision!!!! WTF
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
I think Stevenson would put him on his ass.gilgamesh wrote:I think he'd still be able to make it ugly, and difficult for Stevenson. I wouldn't be shocked if he beat him.diddy wrote:I don't like Bernard's chances against Adonis. Just being honest.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17243
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
More joke scoring. How the hell could a judge score that fight for Shumenov?
-
big train express
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 154
- Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
SD????? that is disgraceful
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Unanimous decision bettors just killed
themselves.
themselves.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
That card.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
OMFG split?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Jesus dude, the blind judges in Boxing never fail to show up.
114-113 Shumenov give me a f*cking break.
114-113 Shumenov give me a f*cking break.