Earl vs Ramanov rescheduled.

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Earl vs Ramanov rescheduled.

Post by stujones »

Its apparently on in Dagenham on the 27 of January. Strange date, this fight should be on TV - but it clashing with the Danny Hunt (maloney fighter) vs Stewart eliminator clash. The Hunt vs Stewart fight is on Sky.

There are some free dates around the January/February mark, I think this bout should be resechulded.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

It does beg the question, how can Frank M be in two places at once and perhaps supports the rumour, or is it fact, that Earl has gone the way of Skelton.
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Post by boxingchat »

I hear Hunt v Stewart is off as MH screwed up a simple contract and his purse offer is void.
JimmyJamJerusalem
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 501
Joined: 14 Apr 2002, 20:00

Post by JimmyJamJerusalem »

I cannot wait to see Romanov destroy Earl. Wonder if he'll pull out again?? Probably not if they re-made the fight. :box:
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

A question: Are we all in danger of overrating Romanov, due to his destruction of Vanzie? After all, how much more of him have any of us seen? Now, I'll agree that Earl looks ripe for the picking. But is it that clearcut?

Just something for debate, because I would pick the Romanov I saw to hammer Earl inside 8 rounds. But have the Maloney's seen something we all haven't?
JimmyJamJerusalem
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 501
Joined: 14 Apr 2002, 20:00

Post by JimmyJamJerusalem »

He's not boxed in 14 months, perhaps that's why they are after him. Still reckon he will destroy Earl though.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

JimmyJamJerusalem wrote:He's not boxed in 14 months, perhaps that's why they are after him. Still reckon he will destroy Earl though.
I tend to agree: Earl really does look ready to go. I'm still interested to see what Romanov has though. My tip for 2006: If Earl hangs on, expect Khan to hammer him sometime around September, BBBC rule allowing. Or, perhaps, matchmaking allowed.
MTG
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 23 Jan 2005, 14:09

Post by MTG »

states wrote:
JimmyJamJerusalem wrote:He's not boxed in 14 months, perhaps that's why they are after him. Still reckon he will destroy Earl though.
I tend to agree: Earl really does look ready to go. I'm still interested to see what Romanov has though. My tip for 2006: If Earl hangs on, expect Khan to hammer him sometime around September, BBBC rule allowing. Or, perhaps, matchmaking allowed.
KHAN WONT BE ANYWHERE NEAR HIM,AND IF THERE WAS TALK IN THE FUTURE THEN THE OLD RULE WOULD BE A DELIBERATE WALL.


M.T GILLICK
Last edited by MTG on 09 Dec 2005, 13:57, edited 1 time in total.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

It wasn't a serious tip.....
Post Reply