Is the best post war year for talent across the divisions?

Post Reply
Broomhall
Middleweight
Posts: 1552
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 14:47

Is the best post war year for talent across the divisions?

Post by Broomhall »

How tough must it have been to win a world title in 1984. Each division packed with talent, from Heavyweight down. Is this the best year collectively for talent and strength in depth?



http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_R ... ings:_1984
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15178
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Is the best post war year for talent across the divisions?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Meant to comment on this earlier.
Some weight classes were pretty good, some were not.

Heavy-A lot of guys who were very good sometimes and listless sometimes. Holmes was slipping by then. Fair period.
Cruiser-A few good names at the top, not much depth.
LHW-Still decent, but it was declining after a great era.
Middle- Weak. No depth at all.
Jr Middle-Pretty good.
Welter-Pretty good.
Jr Welter-Decent
Lightweight-Might look weak at a first glance, but there were several solid fighters who were roughly even. Certainly not a great era, but a decent one for the division.
Jr Light-Good at the top, then weak.
Feather-Pretty good.
Jr Feather, Bantam, and Fly-As usual little depth in these lower divisions. Got worse since 1984, with the additions of still more unnecessary weight classes, furthering diluting the talent pools in a given weight class.
Post Reply