Jack Gardner

coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... O-s!/page6

I found this good biography on Jack Gardner on www.checkhookboxing.com, but trying to sign on there as a member is a pain in the ass though.
It's truthful, but a bit biased against Jack, such as his 7 - Round TKO over Bacilieri and his controversial 10 - Round Decision over Lave. I had read that Lave knocked him down twice in the first round, the first time Jack was down the for the count, but afterwards Gardner dominated the fight despite having a broken nose and cuts.
It's strange how Gardner knocked Escoe down three times and still lost the verdict.

I think Jack Gardner could have been the Heavyweight Champion of the World, but he lacked technique, defense, but most of all he lacked ambition.
One newspaper read that he only made his comeback so he could help pay for his farm.
Seems like even though he wasn't 100% dedicated he put together a good record of 28 - 6 (23 KO's).

Does anyone have news articles OR even videos on his First Round KO's of Ron Raynor, Harry Bedford, Hugh O' Reilly, Matt Hardy, Bill Brennan, Tommy Brown, or KO Gene Fowler?


Out of all of the boxers named Gardner I am researching for my book, Jack Gardner looks the most related, probably a distant cousin, maybe the same 15th Great Grandfather or something.
Broomhall
Middleweight
Posts: 1552
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 14:47

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by Broomhall »

coreygardner wrote:http://checkhookboxing.com/showthread.p ... O-s!/page6

I found this good biography on Jack Gardner on http://www.checkhookboxing.com, but trying to sign on there as a member is a pain in the ass though.
It's truthful, but a bit biased against Jack, such as his 7 - Round TKO over Bacilieri and his controversial 10 - Round Decision over Lave. I had read that Lave knocked him down twice in the first round, the first time Jack was down the for the count, but afterwards Gardner dominated the fight despite having a broken nose and cuts.
It's strange how Gardner knocked Escoe down three times and still lost the verdict.

I think Jack Gardner could have been the Heavyweight Champion of the World, but he lacked technique, defense, but most of all he lacked ambition.
One newspaper read that he only made his comeback so he could help pay for his farm.
Seems like even though he wasn't 100% dedicated he put together a good record of 28 - 6 (23 KO's).

Does anyone have news articles OR even videos on his First Round KO's of Ron Raynor, Harry Bedford, Hugh O' Reilly, Matt Hardy, Bill Brennan, Tommy Brown, or KO Gene Fowler?


Out of all of the boxers named Gardner I am researching for my book, Jack Gardner looks the most related, probably a distant cousin, maybe the same 15th Great Grandfather or something.
Hang on a minute......thats like saying I could have won a gold medal in the 100 metres but I lacked the ability to run fast enough.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Yeah, and what I meant was he had the ability, but not the ambition, meaning after his three decision losses he lacked ambition.

If you are running the 100 metre, you have the ambition, but you don't have the ability in your case, get it.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Are you still here doing this shite, why don't you farck off with this? No one cares. :zzz:
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:Are you still here doing this shite, why don't you farck off with this? No one cares. :zzz:
Apparently you do care, you keep commenting on it.
Please listen to what you are saying, "shite" and "farck off". Really?
Fat Git, I hope you realize how lame you are.

I'll send you a free copy of my book when I'm through, then again, I'll charge you extra, and for some reason, I have a feeling you will buy the book since you just have to comment.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:
Fat Git wrote:Are you still here doing this shite, why don't you farck off with this? No one cares. :zzz:
Apparently you do care, you keep commenting on it.
Please listen to what you are saying, "shite" and "farck off". Really?
Fat Git, I hope you realize how lame you are.

I'll send you a free copy of my book when I'm through, then again, I'll charge you extra, and for some reason, I have a feeling you will buy the book since you just have to comment.
The fact you think your book is going to get published is laughable, I love boxing books but to think I would read one because certain pugilists share the same surname as the author is a joke.

I might be lame but I do hope you get to treat your OCD, not cheap in yankland I know. :(
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
coreygardner wrote:
Fat Git wrote:Are you still here doing this shite, why don't you farck off with this? No one cares. :zzz:
Apparently you do care, you keep commenting on it.
Please listen to what you are saying, "shite" and "farck off". Really?
Fat Git, I hope you realize how lame you are.

I'll send you a free copy of my book when I'm through, then again, I'll charge you extra, and for some reason, I have a feeling you will buy the book since you just have to comment.
The fact you think your book is going to get published is laughable, I love boxing books but to think I would read one because certain pugilists share the same surname as the author is a joke.

I might be lame but I do hope you get to treat your OCD, not cheap in yankland I know. :(


You are making progress Fat Git, you admitted that you are lame.

The book is not entirely on prizefighters with the surname. It involves several war heroes, notorious criminals, and people of note, exactly 75 biographies.
Yankland, huh, is that the place where my ancestor beat your ancestor?

Did Jack Gardner beat the "shite" out of you when you were a kid? You only comment on posts I make on him, not the others.

I guess this is what it is like to a have a follower on twitter or something, Fat Git is a follower.
Get lost Fat Git.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

uphillgardner wrote: You are making progress Fat Git, you admitted that you are lame.
I am lame, so what? It is no secret.
The book is not entirely on prizefighters with the surname. It involves several war heroes, notorious criminals, and people of note, exactly 75 biographies.
It aint going to get published sonny, it sounds boring as fornicate.
Yankland, huh, is that the place where my ancestor beat your ancestor?
Have you got on your knees to France in gratitude for that 'win' 230 years ago yet?
Did Jack Gardner beat the "shite" out of you when you were a kid? You only comment on posts I make on him, not the others.
No, I made a comment on your laughable post about not ever seeing a boxer with a gut, obviously never seen Witherspoon ve Tubbs or Coetzee vs Page then? :doh:
I guess this is what it is like to a have a follower on twitter or something, Fat Git is a follower.
Get lost Fat Git.
[/quote]

You stop posting boring shite and I will stop 'following' you. Deal?
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
uphillgardner wrote: You are making progress Fat Git, you admitted that you are lame.
I am lame, so what? It is no secret.
The book is not entirely on prizefighters with the surname. It involves several war heroes, notorious criminals, and people of note, exactly 75 biographies.
It aint going to get published sonny, it sounds boring as eff.
Yankland, huh, is that the place where my ancestor beat your ancestor?
Have you got on your knees to France in gratitude for that 'win' 230 years ago yet?
Did Jack Gardner beat the "shite" out of you when you were a kid? You only comment on posts I make on him, not the others.
No, I made a comment on your laughable post about not ever seeing a boxer with a gut, obviously never seen Witherspoon ve Tubbs or Coetzee vs Page then? :doh:
I guess this is what it is like to a have a follower on twitter or something, Fat Git is a follower.
Get lost Fat Git.
You stop posting boring shite and I will stop 'following' you. Deal?[/quote]





Get used to following me Fat Git.

My comment on "not ever seeing a boxer with a gut", was simply me saying John L. didn't look like a professional boxer physically. Of course I've seen Butterbean and other successful boxers overweight. I was just stating a fact, you wouldn't guess John L. was a pro boxer if you met him before that Sykes fight, physically. I think I explained that to you earlier.

Read carefully and slowly before you comment, think before you speak.....

You made me laugh out loud with the thanking France comment, that was a good one.

If you find it so boring, just pass over it, you don't have to read it, but it just catches your interest so much, you have to comment.

Deal with that Fat Git.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

uphillgardner wrote:

Get used to following me Fat Git.

My comment on "not ever seeing a boxer with a gut", was simply me saying John L. didn't look like a professional boxer physically. Of course I've seen Butterbean and other successful boxers overweight. I was just stating a fact, you wouldn't guess John L. was a pro boxer if you met him before that Sykes fight, physically. I think I explained that to you earlier.
Your point had no point, what does a fighter look like? Louis Monaco but he wasn't as successful as John L or George Foreman though he would beat them in a bodybuilding contest. Fighters - especially heavyweights, come in all shapes, if you knew boxing, you would know.
You made me laugh out loud with the thanking France comment, that was a good one.
Why did it make you laugh? Because you don't know the history of your own country?
If you find it so boring, just pass over it, you don't have to read it, but it just catches your interest so much, you have to comment.
The crap you write is as dull as shite but has comedy value so the comments will continue.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
uphillgardner wrote:

Get used to following me Fat Git.

My comment on "not ever seeing a boxer with a gut", was simply me saying John L. didn't look like a professional boxer physically. Of course I've seen Butterbean and other successful boxers overweight. I was just stating a fact, you wouldn't guess John L. was a pro boxer if you met him before that Sykes fight, physically. I think I explained that to you earlier.
Your point had no point, what does a fighter look like? Louis Monaco but he wasn't as successful as John L or George Foreman though he would beat them in a bodybuilding contest. Fighters - especially heavyweights, come in all shapes, if you knew boxing, you would know.
You made me laugh out loud with the thanking France comment, that was a good one.
Why did it make you laugh? Because you don't know the history of your own country?
If you find it so boring, just pass over it, you don't have to read it, but it just catches your interest so much, you have to comment.
The crap you write is as dull as shite but has comedy value so the comments will continue.



That's the thing, you focus on something that's ridiculous, why don't you focus on something as ridiculous as yourself.

I made a short comment on John L., already having said that I've seen pro fighters like Butterbean and many other successful boxers, and just made a short comment that most people would have simply agreed and then not commented.

Nine times out of ten, pro fighters look like pro fighters, they are in shape, not bodybuilders, but every now and then you see a fat guy in the ring.

Merceman acted like a normal human being in his response. I already knew what he meant when he wrote it. I knew that what I wrote was misunderstood.

I refuse to insult England, because that's where my ancestors came from and there are nice Brits on here, Fat Git is just a sad representation of an Englishman.

Fat Git, do you do know the history of America? When does your American history class start Fat Git?
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:
That's the thing, you focus on something that's ridiculous, why don't you focus on something as ridiculous as yourself.
Whilst you are around, I will never be that ridiculous
I made a short comment on John L., already having said that I've seen pro fighters like Butterbean and many other successful boxers, and just made a short comment that most people would have simply agreed and then not commented.
John L was hardly out of shape or looked out of shape, he just isn't 'cut' and so what? most heavyweights aren't. A lot of heavyweights have a gut. That you don't differentiate a heavyweight and a any other fighter below middleweight shows how little you know and needs to be pointed out.
Nine times out of ten, pro fighters look like pro fighters, they are in shape, not bodybuilders, but every now and then you see a fat guy in the ring.
And he will be either a heavyweight or more rarely cruiserweight. John L was a heavyweight without a weight limit to fight under so he might not look as 'cut' as a fighter in the lighter weight divisions - it isn't rocket science Einstein.
Merceman acted like a normal human being in his response. I already knew what he meant when he wrote it. I knew that what I wrote was misunderstood.

I refuse to insult England, because that's where my ancestors came from and there are nice Brits on here, Fat Git is just a sad representation of an Englishman.

Fat Git, do you do know the history of America? When does your American history class start Fat Git?

You are a cretin and unlike you, have real Native American ancestry, not some European pretending to be one.

Go and have a read of the French and their involvement in the American war of independence. Thanks. :wave:
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
coreygardner wrote:
That's the thing, you focus on something that's ridiculous, why don't you focus on something as ridiculous as yourself.
Whilst you are around, I will never be that ridiculous
I made a short comment on John L., already having said that I've seen pro fighters like Butterbean and many other successful boxers, and just made a short comment that most people would have simply agreed and then not commented.
John L was hardly out of shape or looked out of shape, he just isn't 'cut' and so what? most heavyweights aren't. A lot of heavyweights have a gut. That you don't differentiate a heavyweight and a any other fighter below middleweight shows how little you know and needs to be pointed out.
Nine times out of ten, pro fighters look like pro fighters, they are in shape, not bodybuilders, but every now and then you see a fat guy in the ring.
And he will be either a heavyweight or more rarely cruiserweight. John L was a heavyweight without a weight limit to fight under so he might not look as 'cut' as a fighter in the lighter weight divisions - it isn't rocket science Einstein.
Merceman acted like a normal human being in his response. I already knew what he meant when he wrote it. I knew that what I wrote was misunderstood.

I refuse to insult England, because that's where my ancestors came from and there are nice Brits on here, Fat Git is just a sad representation of an Englishman.

Fat Git, do you do know the history of America? When does your American history class start Fat Git?

You are a cretin and unlike you, have real Native American ancestry, not some European pretending to be one.

Go and have a read of the French and their involvement in the American war of independence. Thanks. :wave:


Thanks, I already knew that the French helped the Americans out, just like the Germans tried to help the British out.

Yes, you know so much about me, I actually have Native American ancestry, Caddo, Cherokee, and Choctaw, go read about it and then write back and insult.

I will be adding a short biography on old Jack Gardner in about a week or so, so feel free to comment and keep my thread going. :yay:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:
Thanks, I already knew that the French helped the Americans out, just like the Germans tried to help the British out.
Your abridged version of the history of American independence is laughable but unsurprising -
If it wasn't for the French, Spanish and Dutch you wouldn't have won that war. Simple as that.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
coreygardner wrote:
Thanks, I already knew that the French helped the Americans out, just like the Germans tried to help the British out.
Your abridged version of the history of American independence is laughable but unsurprising -
If it wasn't for the French, Spanish and Dutch you wouldn't have won that war. Simple as that.


Yes, everyone Fat Git knows American history better than Americans, I'm sure of that (sarcasm).

One thing is for sure, I wouldn't need the French, Spanish, and Dutch to singe - handedly give you the beating of a lifetime.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:
Yes, everyone Fat Git knows American history better than Americans, I'm sure of that (sarcasm).
It is part of British history as well you fornicating moron. :TU:
One thing is for sure, I wouldn't need the French, Spanish, and Dutch to singe - handedly give you the beating of a lifetime.
Drop me a line when you come on over and cease talking about it. It is gonna hurt for ya kid. :D
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
coreygardner wrote:
Yes, everyone Fat Git knows American history better than Americans, I'm sure of that (sarcasm).
It is part of British history as well you effing moron. :TU:
One thing is for sure, I wouldn't need the French, Spanish, and Dutch to singe - handedly give you the beating of a lifetime.
Drop me a line when you come on over and cease talking about it. It is gonna hurt for ya kid. :D

I am wondering if my ancestor, Thomas Gardner, a Continental soldier killed your British ancestor at the Battle of Yorktown?
(Apologies to the Brits on here, it's only aimed at 'Fat Git', who probably really isn't British, but he's probably descended from a hamster somewhere in Scandinavia or something that migrated into Great Britain).

Why would I come to England to get charged with assault, battery, and possibly murdering a 'Fat Git', that is what you are right?

"It is gonna hurt for ya kid."

You're right, it will hurt for my kid to have his father in prison for murdering a fat, repulsive, complete idiot and moron who has nothing but time on his hands.

P. S.
Thank you for posting on my Tony Gardner biography, and I'm glad you read it and enjoyed, all the best and keep reading.

And I hope you don't commit suicide (sarcasm), because I am going to work again, that's what people do, so I won't be on here to give you a purpose for living. I might get on here every now and then. Maybe you can play scrabble, or do something productive like bob for apples in the toilet, one of your many hobbies.

Thanks for making my threads at the top of the list for a month, you completely lonely and sad individual.

When I have enemies like you, who needs friends :yay:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote: I am wondering if my ancestor, Thomas Gardner, a Continental soldier killed your British ancestor at the Battle of Yorktown?
(Apologies to the Brits on here, it's only aimed at 'Fat Git', who probably really isn't British, but he's probably descended from a hamster somewhere in Scandinavia or something that migrated into Great Britain).


My British ancestors had no part in the brainless empire building that went on. Your ancestor was no hero, just another brain dead moron, trampling on land that he had no moral right to.
Why would I come to England to get charged with assault, battery, and possibly murdering a 'Fat Git', that is what you are right?
You wouldn't, the chances that I bust your face up are pretty good.
You're right, it will hurt for my kid to have his father in prison for murdering a fat, repulsive, complete idiot and moron who has nothing but time on his hands.
You wouldn't do me much harm, the one who would be going to jail is me as you try and put some silly American style lawsuit on me for your broken nose and jaw. The facts are you are the one who first brought up about beating me up and I am here saying I am ready and waiting if you ever make it here. :TU:
P. S.
Thank you for posting on my Tony Gardner biography, and I'm glad you read it and enjoyed, all the best and keep reading.

I am still the only person to post on that thread, be more grateful that I am the only person to give a shit about Tony Gardner.

And why don't you write about this guy? Your dad or a relative of yours no doubt. :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjmMCYWlvao
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

Fat Git wrote:
coreygardner wrote: I am wondering if my ancestor, Thomas Gardner, a Continental soldier killed your British ancestor at the Battle of Yorktown?
(Apologies to the Brits on here, it's only aimed at 'Fat Git', who probably really isn't British, but he's probably descended from a hamster somewhere in Scandinavia or something that migrated into Great Britain).


My British ancestors had no part in the brainless empire building that went on. Your ancestor was no hero, just another brain dead moron, trampling on land that he had no moral right to.
Why would I come to England to get charged with assault, battery, and possibly murdering a 'Fat Git', that is what you are right?
You wouldn't, the chances that I bust your face up are pretty good.
You're right, it will hurt for my kid to have his father in prison for murdering a fat, repulsive, complete idiot and moron who has nothing but time on his hands.
You wouldn't do me much harm, the one who would be going to jail is me as you try and put some silly American style lawsuit on me for your broken nose and jaw. The facts are you are the one who first brought up about beating me up and I am here saying I am ready and waiting if you ever make it here. :TU:
P. S.
Thank you for posting on my Tony Gardner biography, and I'm glad you read it and enjoyed, all the best and keep reading.

I am still the only person to post on that thread, be more grateful that I am the only person to give a poo about Tony Gardner.

And why don't you write about this guy? Your dad or a relative of yours no doubt. :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjmMCYWlvao


Actually, I contacted Chuck for a biography, but his real last name is Saarsgaard or something Scandiavian, his family immigrated from Sweden to America, changing the name, so no relation. His nickname was "The Viking".
A lot of immigrants change there name to sound American.

Wait a minute, are you Chuck? You are a 'Fat Git'?

No, you would have urinated all over yourself before the fight began and passed out.




I did find this video of Jack Gardner beating your dad senseless, check it out:


http://www.britishpathe.com/video/jack- ... y-williams
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:
Actually, I contacted Chuck for a biography, but his real last name is Saarsgaard or something Scandiavian, his family immigrated from Sweden to America, changing the name, so no relation. His nickname was "The Viking".
A lot of immigrants change there name to sound American.
I bet you have black people in this pile of shite book of yours, did you leave them out also as their name wasn't 'Gardner' before they got to America. :roll: You thick kunt.

Chuck Gardner was born as such, I would say he should be in it but it will never be published so it is all 'academic'.
Wait a minute, are you Chuck? You are a 'Fat Git'?

No, you would have urinated all over yourself before the fight began and passed out.
So he is your dad then, falling onto the canvas from a fast straight left. :TU:



I did find this video of Jack Gardner beating your dad senseless, check it out:
Johnny Williams isn't my dad.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

The only kunt is you Fat Git, constantly wining like b***h about posts, you don't have to read, yet you love reading because you have nothing else to do.

Everything you comeback with is completely idiotic.

I really feel sorry for you, obsessed with my posts. The only one with OCD is you, obviously.

Have you ever been in a fight before Fat Git? Seriously? Let me guess, you are the guy who talks so much shi#t and then runs away, that's exactly who you are.

What is your last name Fat Git?

Kuntz?

Go let your boyfriend blow another load in your face. :doh:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:The only kunt is you Fat Git, constantly wining like b***h about posts, you don't have to read, yet you love reading because you have nothing else to do.

Everything you comeback with is completely idiotic.

I really feel sorry for you, obsessed with my posts. The only one with OCD is you, obviously.

Have you ever been in a fight before Fat Git? Seriously? Let me guess, you are the guy who talks so much shi#t and then runs away, that's exactly who you are.
You are a cretin, you know nothing about me except your spamming is annoying people, All the rest of it is bullshit and you know it, you didn't know I have boxed and sparred hundreds of rounds and putting on some gloves and get in with you would not be a big deal, it seems a big deal to you though. Grow up.
What is your last name Fat Git?
You seem to think because me internet moniker on here is 'fat git' that I really am. It might be a bit of self deprecation, you won't get it if I explained but I am not that fat at all and train daily even at the age of 41.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

I train also, but to say that you train sounds ridiculous, you are on boxrec.com all the time.Maybe you should spend more time at the gym than targeting me. I've never personally asked you for information or harassed you, I've only defended myself and I have only insulted you when you have insulted me.

The reason I began boxing and MMA is for two reasons: I realized I had KO power; and to standup for myself against bullies who had harassed me as a kid.

Honestly, I don't care if you have boxed more than I have (you are about 20 years older so it would sound reasonable), you are still a coward hiding behind a computer bullying someone you know can't get to you physically right away.

That's not what a fighter does, that's not what a boxer does.
Do you think Mike Tyson gets on here and does that?
No, if he has a problem with someone he does it face to face.

I am writing a book and this is how I research, I don't have time to search through newspapers. I am not sending people personal messages saying find this, I don't hound people personally who don't have info.
It's a message board and I can post what I like as long as it isn't offensive.
A man walks past something that doesn't interest him.
If a real man has a problem, he confronts the man personally, face to face, not hiding behind a computer.

If I could afford to travel to England I honestly would, and if you are in America, then send me a message and then we will settle it like men, instead of throwing insults back and forth like children.

I will continue to post on here until I've written my biographies, or if I have an opinion on more famous fighters that everyone else discusses.

Boxing is the manly art, men fight with there fists, they shouldn't hide behind computers insulting one another.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

coreygardner wrote:I train also, but to say that you train sounds ridiculous, you are on boxrec.com all the time.Maybe you should spend more time at the gym than targeting me. I've never personally asked you for information or harassed you, I've only defended myself and I have only insulted you when you have insulted me.
What is with the American education system - lets do some maths, over 9 years (that is 3295 days) I have posted just over 5000 posts which makes my post count under two posts a day, that isn't 'being on boxrec all the time' I go out and do shit, some of that involves training, hitting people, shopping, going on the toilet etc.
The reason I began boxing and MMA is for two reasons: I realized I had KO power; and to standup for myself against bullies who had harassed me as a kid.

Honestly, I don't care if you have boxed more than I have (you are about 20 years older so it would sound reasonable), you are still a coward hiding behind a computer bullying someone you know can't get to you physically right away.


You call this bullying? Seeing as it was you who decided to air the physical threats you have no right to whinge about anyone bullying anyone else. You said you would KO me? And from what I have deciphered, it is based on my moniker and that I am 41 years old. You might be ageist and you might be the hardest man in the world and that you can, but you need a bit more than what you are going on - which is, lets be honest - nothing. You wouldn't be KO'ing George Foreman and he is an old age pensioner.

That's not what a fighter does, that's not what a boxer does.
Do you think Mike Tyson gets on here and does that?
No, if he has a problem with someone he does it face to face.
Does Mike Tyson spams websites for years?
I am writing a book and this is how I research, I don't have time to search through newspapers. I am not sending people personal messages saying find this, I don't hound people personally who don't have info.
It's a message board and I can post what I like as long as it isn't offensive.
A man walks past something that doesn't interest him.
If a real man has a problem, he confronts the man personally, face to face, not hiding behind a computer.

If I could afford to travel to England I honestly would, and if you are in America, then send me a message and then we will settle it like men, instead of throwing insults back and forth like children.
Shut up you child, do you think I am going to America I am going to your trailer park when I could be in Disney world or some shit, seeing as you are doing all you tough guy crap - you want to settle it with a few rounds and if you come here - you let me know yeah. :TU:
I will continue to post on here until I've written my biographies, or if I have an opinion on more famous fighters that everyone else discusses.

Boxing is the manly art, men fight with there fists, they shouldn't hide behind computers insulting one another.
Stop your spamming and none of us have a problem.
coreygardner
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 13:42

Re: Jack Gardner

Post by coreygardner »

If I ever can afford to come to England, I'll send you a message if I am in your vicinity where ever there is a boxing gym. Yes, age doesn't matter. You are no George Foreman. The only one spamming is you. For some reason, I think you sit on the toilet more than go to the gym. I don't remember being the first to use physical threats, but sure I guess I did, I believe that as a man you fight with your fists, not behind a computer pissing and moaning about another man's posts.
If you have a problem with me, come to America and settle it. You only communicate with people you find interesting, I don't want to communicate with you.
I am flattered I am the center of your world, your welcome.
Post Reply