Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11811
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by Old bones Ian »

Both of those wouldn't of made any difference if allowed to go on. Benn and Foreman were finished in those fights
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by orbtastic »

Lewis akinwande
fantaheed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 07 Feb 2011, 08:44

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by fantaheed »

Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by mickey1975 »

fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by taffytoon »

mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
NO

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... 0277,d.ZWU

Some of you need to get a life FFS
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by mickey1975 »

taffytoon wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
NO

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... 0277,d.ZWU

Some of you need to get a life FFS
I don't understand? The count WAS long. As for getting a life, I've got one thanks, just popped on here and answered as I remembered. Sorry for that...
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by Final round »

There was some dubious counting in the Williams v Airich fight (as well as some good old early bell ringing ala Enzo v McPhilibin)
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17152
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by keithmoonhangover »

mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
In fairness, Tyson also got a long count
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23192
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by mickey1975 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
In fairness, Tyson also got a long count
Sorry, not got time to reply properly, I'm busy watching Tyson-Douglas on a loop, I don't have a life(despite my mrs and three kids and job, etc)...
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by crusader »

Why is Foreman-Ali dubious?

Foreman goes down with 11 seconds left and is counted out at when the clock ticks 0. Don't go by the commentator's erroneous count--he starts at one when Foreman has been down for several seconds, failing to consider that the ref looked over to the person taking the count and therefore presumably didn't start counting himself at 0; this happens all the time when refs take a few seconds to send someone to a neutral corner, then pick up the count at 3 or 4.
gerryd77
Super Middleweight
Posts: 338
Joined: 30 Nov 2012, 17:30

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by gerryd77 »

taffytoon wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
NO

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... 0277,d.ZWU

Some of you need to get a life FFS

Long count or not, this was certainly queried. It was a huge deal at the time. So doesn't fall into the op's question category.
Old Jack J
Middleweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by Old Jack J »

Benn vs mclennan.

Benn knocked through the ropes in the first round and was given a long count. The ref said after that he gave benn extra time to get back in the ring but benn never fell off the apron of the ring so wasn't entitled to a longer count. The ref changed his tune later and said it was a standard 10 count and no extra time was given.

We all know what happened next.

I don't recall this been queried at the time too much. It certainly looked a long count to me.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5523
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by forcefraser »

Taylor v Froch. Taylor was down for about 12 seconds.

Questionable whether he would have made it up with a correct count.
oliverc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 61
Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 12:15

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by oliverc »

taffytoon wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
fantaheed wrote:Could be completely off the mark but did buster Douglas get a long count v Tyson?
Yes.
NO

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... 0277,d.ZWU

Some of you need to get a life FFS
Time it with a stopwatch. He was on the canvas for about 13 seconds.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by n1ebf »

i've watched Benn Watson a few times but my connection is poor right now. I never thought anything was wrong with it?

I was wondering the other day what would have happened to the Boxing world had Henry Cooper knocked out Ali........I guess the answer would have been a rematch with predictable results....or would Cooper have had to face someone else? (i assume it was for the title).
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by Final round »

n1ebf wrote:i've watched Benn Watson a few times but my connection is poor right now. I never thought anything was wrong with it?

I was wondering the other day what would have happened to the Boxing world had Henry Cooper knocked out Ali........I guess the answer would have been a rematch with predictable results....or would Cooper have had to face someone else? (i assume it was for the title).
The rematch did have predictable results..
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by jameswilson »

Lamon Brewster v Luan Krasniqui.

First knockdown I think. Krasniqui was put down hard, the ref reaches 8 with Krasniqui still down, then stops counting and waits for about 5 seconds for him to get up.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by billy nelson »

Amir Khan's knockdown against Willie Limmond
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by daviddee »

billy nelson wrote:Amir Khan's knockdown against Willie Limmond
That's the longest count in history. Sure the ref went backwards at one stage ha 6,7... 7 and a half... 7 and 3 quarters..
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by bennie »

Bruno-Cummings. Cummings gets up during the count and then immediately drops down to one knee, and the referee just waves it off without continuing to count.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 33008
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by Boxerbeetle »

daviddee wrote:
billy nelson wrote:Amir Khan's knockdown against Willie Limmond
That's the longest count in history. Sure the ref went backwards at one stage ha 6,7... 7 and a half... 7 and 3 quarters..
That fight left me with no doubt that Khan was a brutal KO waiting to happen.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by billy nelson »

daviddee wrote:
billy nelson wrote:Amir Khan's knockdown against Willie Limmond
That's the longest count in history. Sure the ref went backwards at one stage ha 6,7... 7 and a half... 7 and 3 quarters..
At 7 amir went down and Marcus signalled for him to get up rather than count 8,9 & out
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3190
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by deadpan »

Khan-Limond! How could I forget. They stopped just short of providing a crane to get him back up.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Dubious counts from history that were never queried

Post by palooka »

deadpan wrote:Khan-Limond! How could I forget. They stopped just short of providing a crane to get him back up.
Cleverley v Kovalev - the ref picked him up, gave him a cuddle and kiss didn't he :OhYes:
Post Reply