Audley v Harrison punch stats

Post Reply
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45230
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Audley v Harrison punch stats

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Does anyone have them to hand, read them in the paper, but cannot seem to find them online.
jomothepure
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2660
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43

Post by jomothepure »

I meant to watch the fight again and count them up, unfortunately though I have two hands so I might be in danger of over-adding.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9017
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Post by Syntax Error »

'Parcel Force' landed 57 punches in the whole fight & 4 of them were body shots. :o

Williams Landed 121 in the whole fight & 11 were body punches!
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Post by knockout »

ahhh must have looked like 12 round version of hagler and hearns
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Audley V Harrison?? Must have been a dull fight :D
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Syntax Error wrote:'Parcel Force' landed 57 punches in the whole fight & 4 of them were body shots. :o
Are you serious? Sweet Mary of Nazareth..that's four punches per round - hilarious! Reckon he has a future in stand up comedy.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4483
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Post by dookus »

MightyWarrior wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:'Parcel Force' landed 57 punches in the whole fight & 4 of them were body shots. :o
Are you serious? Sweet Mary of Nazareth..that's four punches per round - hilarious! Reckon he has a future in stand up comedy.
Jesus. I wondered if it really was that long between shots, and apparently it was. Given that nearly everything got thrown in the last three rounds, what the fornicate happened in the first nine?
Lefthookhappy19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 968
Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 19:15

Post by Lefthookhappy19 »

Remember many of Audleys "punches" where not actually punches but him flicking a weak jab out. Could hardly be called a jab. I can't think of a more embarrasing performance from supposed pro fighter. Gainer vs Marquez is the only that comes close but this is much more pathetic...
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Post by ILikeBeer »

The fight stats were this; none thrown by either boxer. :(
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1933
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: Audley v Harrison punch stats

Post by My T Sharp »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Does anyone have them to hand, read them in the paper, but cannot seem to find them online.
http://www.allegedly.tv/cgi-bin/boxstatg.cgi

round by round stats :TU:
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Harrison landed only 15 punches that were not jabs. Just over 1 a round!
dandantheweatherman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 337
Joined: 23 Apr 2004, 20:10

Post by dandantheweatherman »

Harrison kept on pawing with his jab, or leaving his fist out and either hoping Williams would walk into it, or perhaps this was to keep Williams at arm's length.

I'd like to think it was to get his range to launch some massive left hands, but obviously this is stretching the bounds of credibilty beyond their bounds.

If Audley had actually jabbed instead of pawed he might have won the fight!
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

But if he'd actually fully extended his jab he'd have left his glass jaw open to a counter.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

nickd wrote:Harrison landed only 15 punches that were not jabs. Just over 1 a round!
Yet some had him winning :o
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

steve689 wrote:
nickd wrote:Harrison landed only 15 punches that were not jabs. Just over 1 a round!
Yet some had him winning :o
No way he won that fight, not possible.
Post Reply