Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post Reply
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Finn »

Im assuming this fight is being lined up since Sky had Paulie Malignaggi over for insight into the Froch V Groves fight, seemed like profile building to me. Does anyone else think its likely the Porter fight is getting blown off in favour of this match up instead?
Roman7
Middleweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 09 Nov 2013, 11:03

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Roman7 »

What about these world titles ?
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by CheckHook »

I thought the Porter fight was near enough signed now for August, unless the Schaffer thing has thrown a spanner in the works.... Paulie is always a potential opponent for anyone though, bit of a name and no punch makes him an appealing fight, but I don't think he'll be fighting until the end of the year, if at all. I think there's more chance of it happening to rebuild Brook if he gets beat by Porter.
chucktaylor
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 536
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 18:02

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by chucktaylor »

I sure hope not as Paulie is coming off a bad loss where he didn't even make a good account of himself, unfortunately. I don't see why this fight gets made- Paulie is at the lowest point in his career coming off 2 losses in 3 fights, with the last one being uncompetitive. He should have a comeback fight, not get in with another elite opponent after suffering a career worst defeat. Of course, he could just retire now with his senses intact and continue with his commentating which he seems to be really succeeding at.
Brook wouldn't stand to advance his career a lot by beating Paulie at this point- it would have meant a lot more a year ago.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Horse »

I think Dan Ion is who Brook would have to fight for the vacant title.

Maybe have Malignaggi vs Purdy on the undercard in an unofficial world title eliminator.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:I think Dan Ion is who Brook would have to fight for the vacant title.

Maybe have Malignaggi vs Purdy on the undercard in an unofficial world title eliminator.
:( you're just trying to bait the Sheffield contingent.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Finn »

Horse wrote:I think Dan Ion is who Brook would have to fight for the vacant title.

Maybe have Malignaggi vs Purdy on the undercard in an unofficial world title eliminator.
Ah good point he could be there to build up for a potential Purdy fight.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Horse »

palooka wrote: :( you're just trying to bait the Sheffield contingent.
No, Malignaggi would be a respectable first defence if he gets a comeback win.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Horse »

Finn wrote:Ah good point he could be there to build up for a potential Purdy fight.
Hearn likes to give Purdy great opportunities.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Parson Cross »

Anybody would think that was the first time Paulie had commentated in Sky.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by expe »

Parson Cross wrote:Anybody would think that was the first time Paulie had commentated in Sky.
People read too much into things sometimes, he's been over before and he's developing a great reputation as a analyst, bringing him in gave a different viewpoint that we don't usually hear.

If Paulie does fight anyone over here, the most likely candidate right now is Frankie Gavin if he beats Bundu, I believe that Malignaggi's Italian roots qualify him for the European title and it would be a good fight to introduce Frankie to an American audience, as well as hopefully bringing the best out of him and selling well too.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by palooka »

It's off topic but I think Paulie is a really good addition, he has good insights - I've sen him comment a few times - I thought he'd be really annoying but he's really good. I'd not like to see him get mauled by big hitting welters; he's done really well for himself - it must be terribly difficult operating near top level without a decent punch to deter someone from just attacking full on. He must have nerves of steel.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Finn »

expe wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Anybody would think that was the first time Paulie had commentated in Sky.
People read too much into things sometimes, he's been over before and he's developing a great reputation as a analyst, bringing him in gave a different viewpoint that we don't usually hear.

If Paulie does fight anyone over here, the most likely candidate right now is Frankie Gavin if he beats Bundu, I believe that Malignaggi's Italian roots qualify him for the European title and it would be a good fight to introduce Frankie to an American audience, as well as hopefully bringing the best out of him and selling well too.
Maybe although last time he came over they were actively talking him up as a brook opponent.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by expe »

Finn wrote:
expe wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Anybody would think that was the first time Paulie had commentated in Sky.
People read too much into things sometimes, he's been over before and he's developing a great reputation as a analyst, bringing him in gave a different viewpoint that we don't usually hear.

If Paulie does fight anyone over here, the most likely candidate right now is Frankie Gavin if he beats Bundu, I believe that Malignaggi's Italian roots qualify him for the European title and it would be a good fight to introduce Frankie to an American audience, as well as hopefully bringing the best out of him and selling well too.
Maybe although last time he came over they were actively talking him up as a brook opponent.
I think that was before the Porter fight though, at that point if he won he would have been fighting Brook next, after the defeat, I don't think there would be much interest in fighting him anymore.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 33003
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

expe wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Anybody would think that was the first time Paulie had commentated in Sky.
People read too much into things sometimes, he's been over before and he's developing a great reputation as a analyst, bringing him in gave a different viewpoint that we don't usually hear.

If Paulie does fight anyone over here, the most likely candidate right now is Frankie Gavin if he beats Bundu, I believe that Malignaggi's Italian roots qualify him for the European title and it would be a good fight to introduce Frankie to an American audience, as well as hopefully bringing the best out of him and selling well too.
Yeah Paulie has definitely said recently that he'd like to fight for the European belt.
Trojans44
Cruiserweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 14:05

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by Trojans44 »

I think Malignaggi is an extremely underrated fighter and I wouldn't see it as a given that Brook beats him easily. Brook got a lot of credit for the Senchenko win but Paulie also completely decimated him. He's really only ever been beaten by elite operators.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by TJ77 »

What a great thread :shame:
Kell has 2 L's.
Honestly the unwarranted BS directed at Brook by certain posters drags this board down.
By all means have your knives sharpened in case it all falls through I wouldn't blame you but wait till the fights announced or ruled out before carving him up again.
The guy has been through the mill enough it really is time to step back and wait and see.
Unless of course your agenda wont allow that.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Kel Brook v Paulie Malignaggi?

Post by TJ77 »

palooka wrote:It's off topic but I think Paulie is a really good addition, he has good insights - I've sen him comment a few times - I thought he'd be really annoying but he's really good. I'd not like to see him get mauled by big hitting welters; he's done really well for himself - it must be terribly difficult operating near top level without a decent punch to deter someone from just attacking full on. He must have nerves of steel.
Agreed he is funny knowledgeable and has over achieved with the tools he has.
Post Reply