Katsidis v Earl II
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Yeah if there was a reason to can it I would understand.AntonS wrote:What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
-
The Raw Prawn
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 303
- Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
There are others out there too who should be told enough is enough.The Raw Prawn wrote:Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
I'm not saying that either fighter should have their licence revoked. But their seems to be alot of people on here complaining about it and I was asking if Qld could can the fight as they have in other states. It all comes down to the matchmaking. Lets just hope both fighters come through unscathed.
-
The Raw Prawn
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 303
- Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
just like to make it clear, no disrespect was intended to any of the boxers mentioned.
They have all made their own positive contributions to the sport we enjoy.
They have all made their own positive contributions to the sport we enjoy.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Probably the way this one should be refereed.AntonS wrote:Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
prob lettin fight go ahead cause both fighters have passed medicals.......and both have slipped backwards,not just one of them
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Well doctors have passed them there should be no problem. Good luck to both boys.