Katsidis v Earl II

AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by AntonS »

What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 774
Joined: 01 Oct 2007, 23:58

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by fox »

AntonS wrote:What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
Yeah if there was a reason to can it I would understand.
The Raw Prawn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 303
Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by The Raw Prawn »

Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by bogan whisperer »

The Raw Prawn wrote:Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
There are others out there too who should be told enough is enough.
fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 774
Joined: 01 Oct 2007, 23:58

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by fox »

I'm not saying that either fighter should have their licence revoked. But their seems to be alot of people on here complaining about it and I was asking if Qld could can the fight as they have in other states. It all comes down to the matchmaking. Lets just hope both fighters come through unscathed.
The Raw Prawn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 303
Joined: 17 Feb 2009, 19:25

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by The Raw Prawn »

just like to make it clear, no disrespect was intended to any of the boxers mentioned.
They have all made their own positive contributions to the sport we enjoy. :TU:
AntonS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6406
Joined: 16 Sep 2003, 04:38

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by AntonS »

Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by bogan whisperer »

AntonS wrote:Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
Probably the way this one should be refereed.
caveman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 519
Joined: 28 Dec 2009, 00:16

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by caveman »

prob lettin fight go ahead cause both fighters have passed medicals.......and both have slipped backwards,not just one of them
fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 774
Joined: 01 Oct 2007, 23:58

Re: Katsidis v Earl II

Post by fox »

Well doctors have passed them there should be no problem. Good luck to both boys.
Post Reply