columbo wrote:No effing way would Woodhall of beaten Froch!
Woodhall at his peak beats Froch. But Froch was about 16 then
columbo wrote:No effing way would Woodhall of beaten Froch!
G0mez wrote:the voting is now 3-1
I expected a much higher turn out. The truth of the matter is that fans of Calzaghe "the boxer" don't need polls. They know.G0mez wrote:the voting is now 3-1
Ian1973 wrote:G0mez wrote:the voting is now 3-1
And? I saw an online poll three - four weeks before the Premiership ended that had 82% of people saying that Liverpool would win the title. It means / proves nothing.

x2Boxerbeetle123 wrote:No doubt in my mind that Froch has by far the better resume, but Calzaghe would have absolutely dominated Froch if they ever fought.
I believe it was Hatton's genuine world title win against Tyszu and his subsequent big fights stateside that spurred Calzaghe out of his comfortzone, i'm certain he envied Hattonat that time. One way or another - Hatton showed him the way, had Hatton not been around doing what he was at that time i'm not convinced Calzaghe would have closed out his career as he did.G0mez wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4226934.stmexpe wrote: Don't think I've attacked anyone on this thread, I've definitely disputed a few things and provided the evidence to back it up, but I haven't had a go at anyone without backing up what I'm saying with something credible.
Everyone should be like you, that does make you sound arrogant I have to say, a forum where everyone mainly just posted memes(although some of them are pretty funny), wouldn't be much good. The same can be said if everyone was like me, there would be a lot of arguing and threads would go on forever, it would be a complete mess and a waste of time. Far, far better to have varied viewpoints and posting styles, not just on here, but in life generally, makes things more interesting, be shite if everyone agreed with each other and all posts were met with unanimous approval.
Bitter every time someone upstages him.