Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
It is a shame to put Sergio Maravilla #9 pound for pound in front of GGG.... At least have the decency to correct your scoring algorithm. Miguel Cotto needs to be up there.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
mogwaiPR wrote:It is a shame to put Sergio Maravilla #9 pound for pound in front of GGG.... At least have the decency to correct your scoring algorithm. Miguel Cotto needs to be up there.
-
SportsRatings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 679
- Joined: 26 May 2010, 23:15
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I make ratings too (HW only) and they are somewhat similar to BoxRec's. Here is my top ten through February, 1990:keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?
Code: Select all
num Fighter record rating
1. BUSTER DOUGLAS (12- 3- 0) 62.21 KO 10 #1 MIKE TYSON
2. MIKE TYSON (22- 1- 0) 59.78 L KO 10 #11 BUSTER DOUGLAS
3. MICHAEL SPINKS ( 9- 1- 0) 44.41 last win -32 months.
4. EVANDER HOLYFIELD ( 9- 0- 0) 34.87
5. TIM WITHERSPOON (17- 3- 0) 27.42
6. FRANCESCO DAMIANI (14- 0- 0) 25.80
7. PIERRE COETZER (19- 2- 0) 23.16
8. HORACE NOTICE ( 8- 0- 0) 21.79 last win -23 months.
9. GARY MASON (14- 0- 0) 20.82
10. RAZOR RUDDOCK ( 9- 1- 0) 19.75
11. GEORGE FOREMAN (35- 2- 0) 16.75
12. MICHAEL DOKES (25- 2- 2) 16.53 Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
How long did it take you to parse the BoxRec database?SportsRatings wrote:I make ratings too (HW only) and they are somewhat similar to BoxRec's. Here is my top ten through February, 1990:keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?
In BoxRec most of the same fighters would probably be up there. Spinks and Notice would be removed for inactivity so I included the top 12.Code: Select all
num Fighter record rating 1. BUSTER DOUGLAS (12- 3- 0) 62.21 KO 10 #1 MIKE TYSON 2. MIKE TYSON (22- 1- 0) 59.78 L KO 10 #11 BUSTER DOUGLAS 3. MICHAEL SPINKS ( 9- 1- 0) 44.41 last win -32 months. 4. EVANDER HOLYFIELD ( 9- 0- 0) 34.87 5. TIM WITHERSPOON (17- 3- 0) 27.42 6. FRANCESCO DAMIANI (14- 0- 0) 25.80 7. PIERRE COETZER (19- 2- 0) 23.16 8. HORACE NOTICE ( 8- 0- 0) 21.79 last win -23 months. 9. GARY MASON (14- 0- 0) 20.82 10. RAZOR RUDDOCK ( 9- 1- 0) 19.75 11. GEORGE FOREMAN (35- 2- 0) 16.75 12. MICHAEL DOKES (25- 2- 2) 16.53
-
SportsRatings
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 679
- Joined: 26 May 2010, 23:15
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
JCS wrote:How long did it take you to parse the BoxRec database?SportsRatings wrote:I make ratings too (HW only) and they are somewhat similar to BoxRec's. Here is my top ten through February, 1990:keithmoonhangover wrote:Is there a way of finding out what the top ten heavyweights looked like the day after Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson?
In BoxRec most of the same fighters would probably be up there. Spinks and Notice would be removed for inactivity so I included the top 12.Code: Select all
num Fighter record rating 1. BUSTER DOUGLAS (12- 3- 0) 62.21 KO 10 #1 MIKE TYSON 2. MIKE TYSON (22- 1- 0) 59.78 L KO 10 #11 BUSTER DOUGLAS 3. MICHAEL SPINKS ( 9- 1- 0) 44.41 last win -32 months. 4. EVANDER HOLYFIELD ( 9- 0- 0) 34.87 5. TIM WITHERSPOON (17- 3- 0) 27.42 6. FRANCESCO DAMIANI (14- 0- 0) 25.80 7. PIERRE COETZER (19- 2- 0) 23.16 8. HORACE NOTICE ( 8- 0- 0) 21.79 last win -23 months. 9. GARY MASON (14- 0- 0) 20.82 10. RAZOR RUDDOCK ( 9- 1- 0) 19.75 11. GEORGE FOREMAN (35- 2- 0) 16.75 12. MICHAEL DOKES (25- 2- 2) 16.53
lol, my database is not nearly as comprehensive as BoxRec's obviously. Since I track HWs only that eliminates the need for 90+% of the size, and I only list fights that are somewhat significant. Hence the records above, which don't match the fighters' actual records at the time, just their significant fights as defined by my system. I have, however, used BoxRec since around 2005 to keep my fight list up to date. Any "parsing" I do is done the old fashioned way -- look at the fighter's page, see if any fights have happened since the last time i checked :)
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Martin,
Would it possible to run a query... fighters with most wins who have
- No losses
- No draws
- No wins by split or majority decision.
Would it possible to run a query... fighters with most wins who have
- No losses
- No draws
- No wins by split or majority decision.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
JCS wrote:Martin,
Would it possible to run a query... fighters with most wins who have
- No losses
- No draws
- No wins by split or majority decision.
Code: Select all
+--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+
| bid | first_name | last_name | wins | nationality | division |
+--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+
| 8222 | Samson | Dutch Boy Gym | 43 | TH | Super Flyweight |
| 536325 | William Fernando | Souza Bezerra | 38 | BR | Cruiserweight |
| 383177 | Wanheng | Menayothin | 35 | TH | Minimumweight |
| 364679 | Mikey | Garcia | 34 | US | Super Featherweight |
| 273110 | Pawel | Kolodziej | 33 | PL | Cruiserweight |
| 468841 | Deontay | Wilder | 32 | US | Heavyweight |
| 46138 | Alexander | Bakhtin | 31 | RU | Bantamweight |
| 316441 | Peter | Quillin | 31 | US | Middleweight |
| 257554 | Nenad | Borovcanin | 30 | RS | Cruiserweight |
| 356831 | Gennady | Golovkin | 30 | KZ | Middleweight |
+--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Thanks! Further confirms the legend of Samson! Though, I suppose we don't know the details of the "PTS" outcomes..computerrank wrote:JCS wrote:Martin,
Would it possible to run a query... fighters with most wins who have
- No losses
- No draws
- No wins by split or majority decision.Code: Select all
+--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+ | bid | first_name | last_name | wins | nationality | division | +--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+ | 8222 | Samson | Dutch Boy Gym | 43 | TH | Super Flyweight | | 536325 | William Fernando | Souza Bezerra | 38 | BR | Cruiserweight | | 383177 | Wanheng | Menayothin | 35 | TH | Minimumweight | | 364679 | Mikey | Garcia | 34 | US | Super Featherweight | | 273110 | Pawel | Kolodziej | 33 | PL | Cruiserweight | | 468841 | Deontay | Wilder | 32 | US | Heavyweight | | 46138 | Alexander | Bakhtin | 31 | RU | Bantamweight | | 316441 | Peter | Quillin | 31 | US | Middleweight | | 257554 | Nenad | Borovcanin | 30 | RS | Cruiserweight | | 356831 | Gennady | Golovkin | 30 | KZ | Middleweight | +--------+------------------+---------------+------+-------------+---------------------+
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Something seems wrong with Sprott's rating and maybe the ratings of people who've done single-night tournaments in general. Look at his before/after ratings for his last 3 fights, which all happened on 1 night:
Martin Rogan (quarterfinal) 84 -> 102
Anthony Nansen (semifinal) 84 -> 84
Kali Meehan (final) 139 -> 84
It looks like these have been calculated out of order or something. It's doubly mysterious when the ratings list his current point total at 102 as well.
Martin Rogan (quarterfinal) 84 -> 102
Anthony Nansen (semifinal) 84 -> 84
Kali Meehan (final) 139 -> 84
It looks like these have been calculated out of order or something. It's doubly mysterious when the ratings list his current point total at 102 as well.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I've brought this up several times before... It's almost like there's no "Show order" column in the database being used as a secondary sort.jujigatame wrote:Something seems wrong with Sprott's rating and maybe the ratings of people who've done single-night tournaments in general. Look at his before/after ratings for his last 3 fights, which all happened on 1 night:
Martin Rogan (quarterfinal) 84 -> 102
Anthony Nansen (semifinal) 84 -> 84
Kali Meehan (final) 139 -> 84
It looks like these have been calculated out of order or something. It's doubly mysterious when the ratings list his current point total at 102 as well.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
how did marco huck lose points despite a clear UD
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re:
It', is certainly true statement calling BoxRec "VAST". But...... the FORMULA I have read it to a degree. I think I would need a TUTOR to take it past the PLAIN ENGLISH on William (Young) Stribling ["King of the Canebreaks"/one of the books I've read. Whole career "stopped" once only & in final minute of Title fight vs Max Schmelling. "Young" vs Tyson, *comeon, every-one know Young would WIN ("kidding"!)].Barrera wrote:Damn, reading from that link has given me a much better understanding of how the database thing works, and just how massive and complex the whole thing is. Maybe there wasn't any crazy people sitting behind a computer on the other side of the world from me purposely placing Carlos Maussa 6th in the world afterall, just the huge upset against a top 5 guy rocketed him up the rankings.
Also, I look forward to a time when the older boxers records are a lot better documented, as I must admit there has been times when I've been looking at peoples records from over 50-75 years ago and on noticing that most of their fights are against guys with less than 20 pro fights I've been like "What the hell!?!", but after reading the part of that link about Mike Tyson and Young Stribling, that makes it alot clearer why it is currently like that.
Keep up the good work, it's very much appreciated.
Quite a historical figure there/ you can tell the TRUE/deep fan/ they will KNOW HIS NAME! But, getting into the Formula, I can't do it seems, >HOPELESS<.
Still, when one examines the ratings it's "nonsense" rating Patterson as high as he is. Then, Billy Backus/ HOW IS IT IN "ALL" he outranks Marlon Starling? DOESN'T MAKE SENSE!
Another thing, how is it a modern day boxer can see his "points" + 1 when the records never "alter revealed"? John Wilkinson 1-12 pro welterweight 1988 - 92 has been +/ then, after a time they -/ that/again [boxer is 0-0 /147lb 1-0 154 lb 0-8 160 lb 0-3 168 lb (ea. boxer climb to Top 4 WBC WBA IBF WBO) & 0-1 175/ Matt Mullaney Referee that "match"/by-the-way vs SUERO & it IS NOT in his RECORD]
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Good question. You will see that often when one combs down on RECORDS.cold187 wrote:how did marco huck lose points despite a clear UD
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
>SPOT ON SELECTION<jujigatame wrote:Something seems wrong with Sprott's rating and maybe the ratings of people who've done single-night tournaments in general. Look at his before/after ratings for his last 3 fights, which all happened on 1 night:
Martin Rogan (quarterfinal) 84 -> 102
Anthony Nansen (semifinal) 84 -> 84
Kali Meehan (final) 139 -> 84
It looks like these have been calculated out of order or something. It's doubly mysterious when the ratings list his current point total at 102 as well.
-
ImranSarwar
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53
Re:
Charles '3' HA! Patterson '6' HAAAAA! "WHAT A JOKE!" [WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO NOW? HAVE ME "BANNED FOR LIFE"? **Communist Nation......]Ric wrote:Dempsey and Johnson fell down the rankings Big Time!
http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?natio ... &index=100
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Also, when you look at some undefeated prospects' records, I think it becomes apparent that the correction for level of competition needs to be slightly modified.
For instance, why did Jordan Shimmell go from 93->111 points for KOing Damon McCreary, who only had 2 points? Surely a guy with 2 points should be considered an abject scrub and a win over such a fighter should be worth nothing to an established fighter coming into the fight with 93 points.
For instance, why did Jordan Shimmell go from 93->111 points for KOing Damon McCreary, who only had 2 points? Surely a guy with 2 points should be considered an abject scrub and a win over such a fighter should be worth nothing to an established fighter coming into the fight with 93 points.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
I believe there is a tier system of sorts behind the scenes that limits a boxer until he beats someone in a "higher tier"...jujigatame wrote:Also, when you look at some undefeated prospects' records, I think it becomes apparent that the correction for level of competition needs to be slightly modified.
For instance, why did Jordan Shimmell go from 93->111 points for KOing Damon McCreary, who only had 2 points? Surely a guy with 2 points should be considered an abject scrub and a win over such a fighter should be worth nothing to an established fighter coming into the fight with 93 points.
The problem is, McCreary probably got in that higher tier way back in 2001... and hasn't done anything relevant since.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7437
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
That's kind of odd. I feel like the BoxRec system could do with some simplification. If you're an established 13-0 prospect there's no reason a fight against a guy with 2 rating points should do anything for you whatsoever. What McCreary did in 2001 should have little to no impact on what a win over him is worth in 2014.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the ratings
Yeah.. McCreary is certainly an edge case....jujigatame wrote:That's kind of odd. I feel like the BoxRec system could do with some simplification. If you're an established 13-0 prospect there's no reason a fight against a guy with 2 rating points should do anything for you whatsoever. What McCreary did in 2001 should have little to no impact on what a win over him is worth in 2014.
-
marcianofan
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 288
- Joined: 12 May 2004, 01:12
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
Would it be possible to figure out exactly where Joey Vegas was ranked at light heavyweight on June 4, 2014, right before his fight with Dmitry Sukhotsky? Thanks, if so!
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
#74marcianofan wrote:Would it be possible to figure out exactly where Joey Vegas was ranked at light heavyweight on June 4, 2014, right before his fight with Dmitry Sukhotsky? Thanks, if so!
Code: Select all
rk|division |firstname |lastname | r
---|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----
1|light heavyweight |Adonis |Stevenson | 911
2|light heavyweight |Bernard |Hopkins | 790
3|light heavyweight |Sergey |Kovalev | 585
4|light heavyweight |Jean |Pascal | 561
5|light heavyweight |Julio Cesar |Chavez Jr | 523
6|light heavyweight |Juergen |Braehmer | 434
7|light heavyweight |Edwin |Rodriguez | 392
8|light heavyweight |Chad |Dawson | 385
9|light heavyweight |Isaac |Chilemba | 340
10|light heavyweight |Lucian |Bute | 327
11|light heavyweight |Jose |Uzcategui | 319
12|light heavyweight |Blake |Caparello | 315
13|light heavyweight |Thomas |Williams Jr | 298
14|light heavyweight |Eleider |Alvarez | 292
15|light heavyweight |Andrzej |Fonfara | 291
16|light heavyweight |Tavoris |Cloud | 285
17|light heavyweight |Tony |Bellew | 283
18|light heavyweight |Jarrod |Fletcher | 277
19|light heavyweight |Nadjib |Mohammedi | 272
20|light heavyweight |Dmitry |Sukhotsky | 267
21|light heavyweight |Robert |Berridge | 247
22|light heavyweight |Ovill |McKenzie | 244
23|light heavyweight |Beibut |Shumenov | 241
24|light heavyweight |Anthony |Dirrell | 227
25|light heavyweight |Ryno |Liebenberg | 216
26|light heavyweight |Cedric |Agnew | 211
27|light heavyweight |Zsolt |Erdei | 205
28|light heavyweight |Nathan |Cleverly | 204
29|light heavyweight |Brian |Vera | 202
30|light heavyweight |Enzo |Maccarinelli | 196
31|light heavyweight |Roberto Feliciano |Bolonti | 193
32|light heavyweight |Ryota |Murata | 192
33|light heavyweight |Callum |Smith | 191
34|light heavyweight |Youri |Kayembre Kalenga | 191
35|light heavyweight |Maxim |Vlasov | 182
36|light heavyweight |Hadillah |Mohoumadi | 181
37|light heavyweight |Anatoliy |Dudchenko | 162
38|light heavyweight |Bob |Ajisafe | 162
39|light heavyweight |Jackson |Junior | 150
40|light heavyweight |Allan |Green | 145
41|light heavyweight |Travis |Dickinson | 140
42|light heavyweight |Karo |Murat | 137
43|light heavyweight |Ismayl |Sillah | 135
44|light heavyweight |Cornelius |White | 131
45|light heavyweight |Denis |Grachev | 129
46|light heavyweight |Jonathan |Gonzalez | 127
47|light heavyweight |Sean |Monaghan | 127
48|light heavyweight |Rocky |Fielding | 126
49|light heavyweight |Alejandro |Berrio | 120
50|light heavyweight |Erik |Skoglund | 119
51|light heavyweight |Dyah |Davis | 113
52|light heavyweight |Edison |Miranda | 113
53|light heavyweight |Gabriel |Campillo | 113
54|light heavyweight |Robin |Krasniqi | 111
55|light heavyweight |Radivoje |Kalajdzic | 110
56|light heavyweight |Harry |Simon | 108
57|light heavyweight |Lionell |Thompson | 105
58|light heavyweight |Geard |Ajetovic | 105
59|light heavyweight |Paul |Smith | 103
60|light heavyweight |Marcus |Oliveira | 102
61|light heavyweight |Michael |Seals | 102
62|light heavyweight |Vyacheslav |Uzelkov | 101
63|light heavyweight |Igor |Mikhalkin | 100
64|light heavyweight |Kevin |Thomas Cojean | 97
65|light heavyweight |Don |George | 95
66|light heavyweight |Yusaf |Mack | 95
67|light heavyweight |Jake |Carr | 93
68|light heavyweight |Pablo Oscar Natalio |Farias | 92
69|light heavyweight |Robert |Woge | 92
70|light heavyweight |Yunieski |Gonzalez | 91
71|light heavyweight |Tony |Averlant | 91
72|light heavyweight |Jesse |Hart | 89
73|light heavyweight |Vincent |Feigenbutz | 89
74|light heavyweight |Joey |Vegas | 88
75|light heavyweight |Eduard |Gutknecht | 88
76|light heavyweight |Pawel |Glazewski | 85
77|light heavyweight |Timy |Shala | 85
78|light heavyweight |Oleksandr |Cherviak | 84
79|light heavyweight |Vyacheslav |Shabranskyy | 84
80|light heavyweight |Dean |Francis | 84
81|light heavyweight |Stefano |Abatangelo | 82
82|light heavyweight |Sullivan |Barrera | 82
83|light heavyweight |Doudou |Ngumbu | 81
84|light heavyweight |Rohan |Murdock | 78
85|light heavyweight |Johnny |Muller | 77
86|light heavyweight |Patrick |Bois | 76
87|light heavyweight |Aaron |Pryor Jr | 74
88|light heavyweight |Willbeforce |Shihepo | 74
89|light heavyweight |Farah |Ennis | 73
90|light heavyweight |Azea |Augustama | 72
91|light heavyweight |Fulgencio |Zuniga | 72
92|light heavyweight |Francis |Cheka | 72
93|light heavyweight |Ruben Eduardo |Acosta | 72
94|light heavyweight |Daniel |MacKinnon | 71
95|light heavyweight |Yuzo |Kiyota | 71
96|light heavyweight |Bernard |Donfack | 71
97|light heavyweight |Hakim |Zoulikha | 70
98|light heavyweight |Isidro |Ranoni Prieto | 70
99|light heavyweight |Lennox |Allen | 70
100|light heavyweight |Hugo |Kasperski | 69Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
Martin... do you know where Wladimir would rank in All-Time HW were he to retire today?
Does he have a shot at getting much higher given the current landscape of the division... assuming he has 2-3 more years like his last 5?
Does he have a shot at getting much higher given the current landscape of the division... assuming he has 2-3 more years like his last 5?
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
He would be #13 with 1098 points.JCS wrote:Martin... do you know where Wladimir would rank in All-Time HW were he to retire today?
Does he have a shot at getting much higher given the current landscape of the division... assuming he has 2-3 more years like his last 5?
During 2 to 3 additional years he could achieve 270 to 400 additional points - ending at 1370 to 1500 points - at #7 to #5.
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
Martin: any chance you could tell me the last time that 4 british titles were contested in one show?
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec Ratings - Read first before commenting on the rat
Never before ...@matt___s wrote:Martin: any chance you could tell me the last time that 4 british titles were contested in one show?
Code: Select all
| title | date | show | t_bouts |
| UK | 1975-09-30 | 55098 | 3 |
| UK | 2003-11-22 | 348616 | 3 |
| UK | 2012-10-13 | 649069 | 3 |
| UK | 1929-05-16 | 20476 | 3 |
| UK | 2014-11-29 | 699689 | 4 |