Naz in big trouble

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 15 Dec 2005, 09:36

http://www.britishboxing.net/news_1130- ... harge.html

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 15 Dec 2005, 09:38

Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.

If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 15 Dec 2005, 09:42

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.

If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.

I think it's a probability rather than a possibility but one has to be careful when one doesn't have one's law book to hand...

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 15 Dec 2005, 09:50

Indeed....M'lud

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 15 Dec 2005, 09:51

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.

If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.
I think it's a probability rather than a possibility but one has to be careful when one doesn't have one's law book to hand...

Highway code has 2yrs Max custodial and unlimited fine for dangerous driving.

Penalty table on http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/28.htm scroll down a bit to chapter 5.

KO Artist · Post by **KO Artist** » 15 Dec 2005, 10:01

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:http://www.britishboxing.net/news_1130- ... harge.html

There are reports he ran and left the guy for dead.

Could be a 2 -3 stretch coming up for Naz

Oh well, at least he will be back at Featherweight by the time he comes out.

I heard he likes Porridge.

knockout · Post by **knockout** » 15 Dec 2005, 10:12

The irony is that allegdely the guy in the other car used to train with Brendan Ingle too!!!

dandantheweatherman · Post by **dandantheweatherman** » 15 Dec 2005, 12:37

Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.

states · Post by **states** » 15 Dec 2005, 12:41

dandantheweatherman wrote:Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.

Didn't the fella Lee Hughes hit die though?

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 15 Dec 2005, 12:47

Surely it'll just be a fine? No alchohol involved, and his hot shot lawyer will argue it was a one off error of judgement ( or whatever ) etc etc

Gordon · Post by **Gordon** » 15 Dec 2005, 12:52

Young girl in my work has just got herself a 3 month ban. No fine, no penalty points.

She was doing 113mph on a 40 mph limit.

Daddy got her a good lawyer,

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 15 Dec 2005, 13:29

If you remember Hamed did a runner from the scene, so not just a straight up dangerous driving charge perhaps, it will be fleeing the scene of an accident also surely? By rights he should be banged up, if any of us regular Joe's did what he has done we'd be going away for a little holiday why should it be any different for him.

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 15 Dec 2005, 13:31

Doesn't mention doing a runner in the charges I've seen.

Serious enough to add leaving the scene of a crime if he did you'd think..maybe that was his two "buddies", who just had charges dropped.

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 15 Dec 2005, 13:34

MightyWarrior wrote:Doesn't mention doing a runner in the charges I've seen.

Serious enough to add leaving the scene of a crime if he did you'd think..maybe that was his two "buddies", who just had charges dropped.

I remember from the time of the accident, Hamed and one of his brothers I think ran from the scene. At the time there was confusion as to who was driving the car, I'm sure I read somewhere they thought Hamed might have lent the car to someone who was uninsured. Just going on memory here so may not be the case.

tonyevs · Post by **tonyevs** » 15 Dec 2005, 15:08

It takes exceptional charges to send a celebrity to prison...or to even get it taken seriously

Fine looks the most likely scenario...who is that celebrity lawyer who gets all the footballers off? he`d probably get it thrown out

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 15 Dec 2005, 15:12

states wrote:
dandantheweatherman wrote:Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.
Didn't the fella Lee Hughes hit die though?

Yeah the old guy did die and Lee Hughes is now banged up for in Featherstone prison not far from me.

hammer · Post by **hammer** » 16 Dec 2005, 08:22

yeah but the diffrences is one was high on drink and drugs,the other just not paying attenion on the road.think it will be harsh if naz is sent down ,cant see it my self but who knows with all this terroist stuff and the fact naz is a hardcore musilm they may make him pay .

hammer · Post by **hammer** » 16 Dec 2005, 08:27

i have no faith in the british justice system.

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 16 Dec 2005, 08:38

KO Atrist wrote: I heard he likes Porridge.

Dont tell me they get UK Gold on the inside too?

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 16 Dec 2005, 09:30

Don't think he'll go inside: I hear the prison population is balooning, which I think is an outrage - why should these criminals be allowed the trip of a lifetime - something us normal folk can only dream about?

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 16 Dec 2005, 09:36

MightyWarrior wrote:Don't think he'll go inside: I hear the prison population is balooning, which I think is an outrage - why should these criminals be allowed the trip of a lifetime - something us normal folk can only dream about?

Surely Naz is full of enough hot air to go balooning any time he wants

dandantheweatherman · Post by **dandantheweatherman** » 16 Dec 2005, 12:31

Regarding Lee Hughes and Naz, I'd forgotten that Naz didn't actually kill anyone (at least I hope not).

I used to work in Manchester and a mate of mine got off speeding (110 on the M62) by paying the brief Alex Ferguson used to get him off charges when he was speeding because he needed the khazi (or something). Anyway, this brief found some technicality to get my mate off. Cost him thousands, but he reckoned it saved him money on taxi fares to work in the long run!

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 16 Dec 2005, 13:02

Hughes' long sentence rests on a few issues.

Hughes already had a previous conviction for Drink Driving and so the Judge took this into consideration, along with the fact that Hughes also went missing for a few days after the accident.

hitman_hatton1 · Post by **hitman_hatton1** » 16 Dec 2005, 19:05

liamlion wrote:Hughes' long sentence rests on a few issues.

Hughes already had a previous conviction for Drink Driving and so the Judge took this into consideration, along with the fact that Hughes also went missing for a few days after the accident.

hasn't naz got a bit of previous on a motoring offence. unless he fled the scene, he should be ok.

ebeneezer · Post by **ebeneezer** » 16 Dec 2005, 19:12

KO Atrist wrote:I heard he likes Porridge.

I heard that he likes Open All Hours and Last Of The Summer Wine as well.

Naz in big trouble

Naz in big trouble

Re: Naz in big trouble

Re: Naz in big trouble

Re: Naz in big trouble