Right?
Oh well, back to
I'm not "insufferable" (actually, try to be quite pleasant) nor am I "one-note".Tuan_Jim wrote:Exactly. If anything it was the insufferable one-note 'character' posters like Yancey and Duce that drove everyone away.
evrenb wrote:Hey i thought that too...Duce is back....Yancey why dont you contribute rather than complain that it is dead on the forum...? How about a joe frazier appreciation thread?
I know more about the top three divisions from the '60s and '70s than you can hold, boy.Tuan_Jim wrote:You're not 'one-note'? Scan your post history, Yancey. It's hilarious how singular your interest in boxing is. Frazier, or Frazier through the prism of Ali/Foreman/Duce. A real medley of experience.
If you dont mind me asking you Boxbuzz ,How could have Il Duce have been sabotaging the Boxrec records?Tuan_Jim wrote:You're lamenting the loss of a man who was sabotaging the Boxrec records? Only a troll would take such a position.
I'd rather it be quiet round here than have the forum flooded with demented propaganda. Plus those 'stimulating conversations' you refer to were one user having conversations with himself, under multiple names. More 'simulating' that 'stimulating'.
Worry not, your friend Duce is already back posting. See if you can spot who he is.
You know it could be that Il Duce and I may have been of roughly the same age demographics(Baby Boomers),education, and originally from the same part of the country(East Coast).Tuan_Jim wrote:Evren, check out the brand new user 'Caractacus'.
He 'writes' with a 'lot' of the old 'Duce' oddities, such as the habitual misuse of 'symbols', 'apostrophes', and various other strange ~idiosyncrasies~.
He also regularly links to the same Google archives that Duce spent his spare minutes on, those rare moments he enjoyed between writing his fan fiction.
I know who you are!!Caractacus wrote:You know it could be that Il Duce and I may have been of roughly the same age demographics(Baby Boomers),education, and originally from the same part of the country(East Coast).Tuan_Jim wrote:Evren, check out the brand new user 'Caractacus'.
He 'writes' with a 'lot' of the old 'Duce' oddities, such as the habitual misuse of 'symbols', 'apostrophes', and various other strange ~idiosyncrasies~.
He also regularly links to the same Google archives that Duce spent his spare minutes on, those rare moments he enjoyed between writing his fan fiction.
(although I always figured that he was at least ten years older then me)
BTW way Tuan_Jim ,do you mind me asking what your age and nationality is(or were it was that you were born rather?)
I did not delete a thing. So I am the wrong person to thank.Caractacus wrote:No not really.
I had contributed some info to the boxrec records in the past myself.
Namely DOD of a number of Heavyweight fighters that werent listed here.
But I did it over at the Boxing Records and Updates forum
and I always listed a hyper-link to the newspapers I found in it.
BTW Thanks for deleting two months of threads I spent Blood Sweat and Tears
working on after I got out of the hospital in March after having been there for six months .
I wasn't laughing.ThatOne wrote:Why couldn't Duce return but without the ability to alter the record section?
I thought he was funny.
Agree,ThatOne wrote:I missed all the drama...Sure he was an eccentric but why would he deliberately sabotage the records section?
Sheila wrote:Agree,ThatOne wrote:I missed all the drama...Sure he was an eccentric but why would he deliberately sabotage the records section?
His posts had all the ingredients. A mixture of facts, wit and humor.
That's an excuse I keep hearing. I find it odd that he "Sabotaged the records section" right around the time that Klompton was threatening to sue him and Boxrec for libel.ThatOne wrote:I missed all the drama...Sure he was an eccentric but why would he deliberately sabotage the records section?
BoxBuzz wrote:lol well he had a different relationship with that division, and had sold himself pretty well with the guards at the gate I guess.
So yes he had access, but not for long, and once his contributions to the database were reviewed, it was quickly recognized and corrected. So no long term damage done, the data base is after all, a labor of love, by human beings, and sometimes trust is lent out....but once verified to be false, trust can be withdrawn as well.
And yes, there need to be multiple sources before permanent changes can be made. But one can submit "pending" changes as I understand. Subject eventually to verification.
does this answer your questions?
I'll "trust" you are not the ol "Ducer" lol. Until further verification.....
See how it works?