Man, this place seems dead.

[Tuan_Jim]

Dnahar32, are you able to delete Il Duce's new creations? - these would be all posts by Sheila, Caractacus and Scorpio83. He is back despite being banned, and more irritating than ever.

[gp.]

Evren, check out the brand new user 'Caractacus'.

He 'writes' with a 'lot' of the old 'Duce' oddities, such as the habitual misuse of 'symbols', 'apostrophes', and various other strange ~idiosyncrasies~.

He also regularly links to the same Google archives that Duce spent his spare minutes on, those rare moments he enjoyed between writing his fan fiction.

You know it could be that Il Duce and I may have been of roughly the same age demographics(Baby Boomers),education, and originally from the same part of the country(East Coast).
(although I always figured that he was at least ten years older then me)
BTW way Tuan_Jim ,do you mind me asking what your age and nationality is(or were it was that you were born rather?)

That would be "always" since the 13 June when you joined then would it? You are very vociferous in your defence of a man who hasn't even posted since you've been on this site.

I know, I know. You lurked for a long while and it's just a coincidence....really, one of the most annoying things about you is that you think people are stupid enough to fall for this ridiculous nonsense.

[palooka]

I'd be more interested in finding out 'why' Il Duce attempted to throw a spanner in the database,

I thought some of his posts were thought provoking and some were just plain insane; the 'Cassius Clay' threads etc were beyond silly.

He seemed intelligent and he wasn't just a troll.

I agree with the earlier poster who said that when Klompton threatened to set his lawyer on Il Duce, BoxBuzz and BoxRec then they had to act.

Has Klomptons lawyer been in touch I wonder?

[SaadOffTheDeck]

The funny thing about that is I was told Klompton has been banned by many boards.

[BoxBuzz]

FYI.....Banning is always connected to a very specific bad behavior that usually gets a conversation and fair warning on at least 3 occasions. With very few exceptions such as a porn dump, or outright scandalous single event.

I (unlike many here) are quite entertained, and tolerant of even the most absurd opinions. Hmm come to think of it some here may think that a few of my opinions land squarely in that category. But I digress.

We have seen that this board is open to clowns, mischief makers, serious students of pugilism and both passive and passionate followers of the sport. As long as they follow a few simple civil rules.

And yes, if the colorful characters can not follow the rules, then the place will be a bit more grey as a result.

That's just how it is.

Now if you don't like it, Just ask any moderator and I'm sure they will change all the rules, just to fit your personal set of preferences and values.

Ok...I was just kidding about that part.

[yancey]

FYI.....Banning is always connected to a very specific bad behavior that usually gets a conversation and fair warning on at least 3 occasions. With very few exceptions such as a porn dump, or outright scandalous single event.

I (unlike many here) are quite entertained, and tolerant of even the most absurd opinions. Hmm come to think of it some here may think that a few of my opinions land squarely in that category. But I digress.

We have seen that this board is open to clowns, mischief makers, serious students of pugilism and both passive and passionate followers of the sport. As long as they follow a few simple civil rules.

And yes, if the colorful characters can not follow the rules, then the place will be a bit more grey as a result.

That's just how it is.

Now if you don't like it, Just ask any moderator and I'm sure they will change all the rules, just to fit your personal set of preferences and values.

Ok...I was just kidding about that part.

Buzz, why not hitch your pants up, take a puff of your cigarette, and whack Sheila.

It will give you a certain feeling of machismo, make Giancarlo and ThatOne happy, and probably give pint-size evenrb his first mini-erection in years.

[BoxBuzz]

My machismo is already at toxic levels....any more would be dangerous to the fairer sex.

Sheila could file a class action suit against boxrec based on my very presence here.

It's a litigious nightmare. This should have occurred to you.

[evrenb]

FYI.....Banning is always connected to a very specific bad behavior that usually gets a conversation and fair warning on at least 3 occasions. With very few exceptions such as a porn dump, or outright scandalous single event.

I (unlike many here) are quite entertained, and tolerant of even the most absurd opinions. Hmm come to think of it some here may think that a few of my opinions land squarely in that category. But I digress.

We have seen that this board is open to clowns, mischief makers, serious students of pugilism and both passive and passionate followers of the sport. As long as they follow a few simple civil rules.

And yes, if the colorful characters can not follow the rules, then the place will be a bit more grey as a result.

That's just how it is.

Now if you don't like it, Just ask any moderator and I'm sure they will change all the rules, just to fit your personal set of preferences and values.

Ok...I was just kidding about that part.

Buzz, why not hitch your pants up, take a puff of your cigarette, and whack Sheila.

It will give you a certain feeling of machismo, make Giancarlo and ThatOne happy, and probably give pint-size evenrb his first mini-erection in years.

At least spell the name right Yacney

[ThatOne]

It will give you a certain feeling of machismo, make Giancarlo and ThatOne happy, and probably give pint-size evenrb his first mini-erection in years.

Let the record show that ThatOne never petitioned for anybody's banishment, including Shelia and any of his/her doppelgangers.

[keithmoonhangover]

I don't really post in here very much because of a certain poster. He's an unhinged wanker and life's too short. I'm not alone.