Canelo-Lara , Who won?
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23034
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Lara lost, so must be you don't give Lara kudos?handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
I don't like to use the term "running" in boxing.. But sometimes you have to let your shield down and take some risks.. Even little ass Floyd stood in front of Canelo, big bad Lara didn't take a step forward all night. It's a damn shame because Lara should have won the fight, he's the better boxer.. But he didn't do enough to deserve a clear decision.. Yes Lara made Alvarez miss, but he didn't make him pay on a consistent basis. When you throw a limited amount of shots like Lara was, that doesn't leave a lasting impression on the judges when Alvarez is the one coming forward and taking all the risks.
I'm all for the sweet science in boxing.. Hitting and not being hit is the name of the game, but there is other criteria to judge a fight on. Alvarez was the one forcing the action, throwing more punches and leaving that lasting impression on the judges. Lara was landing some sharp punches and they were the telling shots but he was no consistent enough.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23034
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slickBrut wrote:handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
![]()
![]()
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
This. If a fighter's style is lateral movement and he's landing more punches, the onus is on the other guy to cut the ring off. THAT IS BOXING. If you are going to penalize a fighter for not slugging it out you are watching the wrong sport.handsofstone wrote:Lara 116-112,could've been wider IMO,Lara gave Alvarez a boxing lesson last night but i knew Canelo would get the nod just like he did against Trout,even on the backfoot all night long he still landed more punches and sharper ones,i cant remember Alvarez landing one clean headshot all night and most of the bodyshots were partially blocked,the only rounds i gave to Canelo were won on workrate alone
Hit and not be hit's the name of the game,it seems some judges still cant quite grasp that,i'd love to see the compubox numbers,no doubt they would have Lara winning at least 10 rounds,that last judge should be given the boot
Alvarez is a great fighter but when put in against slicksters,he looks nothing more than a plodding journeyman yet him and his fans just counter that by accusing his opponents of running,Lara's not daft he knew if he stayed still he'd be playing into Alvarez's hands
Some experts call it running??? Me,i prefer to give kudo's to Lara to be able to win a whole fight on the backfoot and still be on his toe's at the end
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Alvarez won clearly.
The current poll result is embarrassing to this forum.
The current poll result is embarrassing to this forum.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.Horse wrote:Alvarez won clearly.
The current poll result is embarrassing to this forum.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
He was running and his workrate was awful.ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
Floyd does not fight like Lara. He is far superior to Lara.ikorolev wrote:He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.Horse wrote:He was running and his workrate was awful.ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
No, his workrate was better.ikorolev wrote:Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
It was better if you count hitting air.Horse wrote:No, his workrate was better.ikorolev wrote:Then Canelo's workrate was super awful.

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Wow, a picture of a punch!
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Lara Sucks! I paid to see a fight not a track meet! Lara ran and Canelo chased,that's not boxing. If Lara would have fought Canelo he would have got knocked out!
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Well, landed punches is the main thing which is supposed to count, and Lara landed significantly more clean punches.Horse wrote:Wow, a picture of a punch!
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
I like Canelo,but GGG would annihilate Canelo.Badhusker wrote:Hope there is a rematch, but doubt if there will be.
I would love to see Canelo vs Andrade but he will probably fight Cotto or Kirkland. Canelo vs GGG would be a fun one to watch too.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
He should have, but I sensed he was a little afraid of Canelo's power, or he would have. If he would have stepped up his aggressiveness, it would have been better for him in the eyes of the judges.Final round wrote:Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Yeah it would have done, although I think the one judge flat out decided Lara's style 'ain't my kind of boxing' from the start.Badhusker wrote:He should have, but I sensed he was a little afraid of Canelo's power, or he would have. If he would have stepped up his aggressiveness, it would have been better for him in the eyes of the judges.Final round wrote:Lara hurt Alvarez around the 4th or 5th I think with a hard left and backed him off. I thought he would have gone for him after that.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
You're such a flake, if Mayweather does that same type of style vs Maidana or anyone else you'll be the first to call it "running" but when it's someone you like you give it a pass.ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
What does me seeing Canelo win a fight have to do with Floyd? You're just upset because the guy you picked lost the fight, the judges got it right (except the 117-111 card) but you guys fail to take into account that Saul was the effective aggressor, his bodyshots wore Lara down and clearly had more effect, he controlled the ring (generalship), he made the workrate of Erislandy drop.handsofstone wrote:Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slick
You should learn the art of boxing before you open your big trap.
-
PsychoGamer
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 29 Jun 2012, 11:24
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
What about a draw? Canelo can talk as much he wants. Lara may been running, but he also connected more, tagging him, throwing combinations. Canelo had some bodyshots & one good uppercut, thats it. If he wants a slugfest & not a boxing 'match' he should leave this division & fight Golovkin as middleweight.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23034
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
I infact had Canelo close points in the PTBF so "the guy i picked" never lost the fight but i did feel that Lara would deserve the W but probably come up short on the cards and i was right and Saul may have been the aggressor but he still didnt land a punch of note,he was having success to the body but Lara was using a lot of lateral movement or running as some call it so it was inevitable that he would slow in the later rounds but he still done a good job of making Canelo missBrut wrote:You're such a flake, if Mayweather does that same type of style vs Maidana or anyone else you'll be the first to call it "running" but when it's someone you like you give it a pass.ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running. He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.![]()
What does me seeing Canelo win a fight have to do with Floyd? You're just upset because the guy you picked lost the fight, the judges got it right (except the 117-111 card) but you guys fail to take into account that Saul was the effective aggressor, his bodyshots wore Lara down and clearly had more effect, he controlled the ring (generalship), he made the workrate of Erislandy drop.handsofstone wrote:Ah brut i might have guessed you thought Canelo won,your too busy trying to be "a Floyd nuthugger" or a "pactard" or whatever it is you guys on CS claim one another to be,instead of worrying about the politiks maybe you should try and learn the art of boxing,sure Lara maybe could've punched more in say 2 rounds max but Alvarez was that bad that was the only rounds he could take,due to Lara's drop in work,nothing more,Lara was far too slick
You should learn the art of boxing before you open your big trap.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
Lara 116-112
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23034
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
DittoWoldemar wrote:Lara 116-112
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
His work rate wasn't high, but how does that justify him losing? Does it override his arguably higher accuracy, more frequent connects, and cleaner punching? Would he get more credit if he threw 50 more punches and none of them landed?Horse wrote:He was running and his workrate was awful.ikorolev wrote:What is embarrassing for this forum is people who only accept Mexican style fighting and don't understand boxing. Lara wasn't running.
Floyd does not fight like Lara. He is far superior to Lara.ikorolev wrote:He showed effective movement to avoid wild swings from Canelo, but he was also stinging with crisp clean head shots. He would be an idiot to stand in front of the heavier, more powerful fighter and exchange punches with him. He did exactly what Floyd did, and his only problem is that he is a Cuban unknown to wide fan base.
I understand that by moving so much and not being very active he arguably allowed Canelo to keep the punches landed comparable despite being less accurate, but it sounds like people are penalizing Lara just because they found his style unpleasant. It's easy to see his style could be considered unappealing, but when his movement resulted in Canelo missing wildly with almost everything he threw during those periods of movement, and when he landed clean shots throughout the bout and arguably out landed Alvarez in most rounds, I don't see strong grounds for appealing to Lara's 'running' and low work rate as reasons why any card not in Canelo's favor is poor.
Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?
I used to respect you. I thought you were one of the best posters on here, but all Cuban worshippers are worthy of contempt.crusader wrote:His work rate wasn't high, but how does that justify him losing? Does it override his arguably higher accuracy, more frequent connects, and cleaner punching? Would he get more credit if he threw 50 more punches and none of them landed?
Cubans = boxing cancer.crusader wrote:I understand that by moving so much and not being very active he arguably allowed Canelo to keep the punches landed comparable despite being less accurate, but it sounds like people are penalizing Lara just because they found his style unpleasant. It's easy to see his style could be considered unappealing, but when his movement resulted in Canelo missing wildly with almost everything he threw during those periods of movement, and when he landed clean shots throughout the bout and arguably out landed Alvarez in most rounds, I don't see strong grounds for appealing to Lara's 'running' and low work rate as reasons why any card not in Canelo's favor is poor.
I despise their style with every fibre of my being. They are the antithesis of everything worthwhile.
Their support on this site makes me question the purpose of living.
I don't understand humanity. What's the point?